Rhetorical Analysis Of Susan B Anthony

Mary Ann Shadd Cary uses rhetorical techniques as well as various claims to establish the necessity of her newspaper. These techniques contribute to the importance of the newspaper by emphasizing freedom for slaves and raising on the argument on slavery. One technique Mary Ann Shadd Cary uses is figurative language. Her usage of a metaphor raises the argument on freedom of speech for African Americans. “We need an organ too, for making our voice heard at home.”

At Susan B. Anthony's funeral in 1906, Anna Howard Shaw delivered a eulogy that paid tribute to Anthony's life and legacy as a champion for women's rights. In her speech, Shaw employs a variety of rhetorical devices to convey the message that Anthony's cause of women's rights is a universal cause. One of the rhetorical devices Shaw uses is metaphor. She begins the eulogy by describing the grief and gratitude felt by those in attendance. Shaw says, "Your flags at half-mast tell of a nation's loss, but there are no symbols and no words which can tell the love and sorrow which fill our hearts.

In Truth’s speech, she reflects upon the inequalities among women and blacks. She uses three main forms of rhetorical appeals to deliver her message. These three forms of rhetorical appeals include; ethos, pathos, and logos. Sojourner Truth uses the appeals to showcase her personal experiences to gain an emotional response from audience through the usage of

She asks, “Would Cicero have shone so distinguished an orator if he had not been roused, kindled, and inflamed by the tyranny of Catiline, Verres, and Mark Anthony?” Although the answer to this rhetorical question is obvious, it solidifies an important point in the mind of the reader: experience comes from challenges and difficult times. Making an allusion to an important historical figure and using him as an example will draw a connection in John Quincy Adams’ mind and add emphasis to her message. She follows up her rhetorical question with sentences that – albeit not answering the question directly – add more emphasis to her point, such as, “The habits of a vigorous mind are formed in contending with difficulties. All history will convince you of this, and that wisdom and penetration are the fruit of experience, not the lessons of retirement and leisure.”

During the 1800s, women did not have the right to vote and were denied many other rights that all men had. In 1872, Anthony voted in the presidential election. Two weeks later, she was arrested. After her charge, Anthony gave her famous “Women's Right to Suffrage” speech. She stated in her speech,”It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen’s rights.”

Mark Antony, as noble as a bald eagle in the eyes of Rome, was one of the most intelligent, trustworthy, and popular people of his time. After Caesar’s murder, Antony gains the trust of the conspirators to speak to the citizens at Caesar’s funeral. He uses his speech to indirectly turn the people of Rome against the conspirators. Antony was one of many to give a long speech within the story, but what stands out in his speeches is the ability to move a whole population’s tendencies and beliefs to side with himself using the power of rhetoric. Although Antony’s speech may be seen as him just feeding the people’s ears with words they want to hear, the well structured devices used enable the listeners to fill their own ears with their second guessing thoughts.

This humanities passage is from a speech by Susan B. Anthony, a 19th-century women’s rights leader. Susan B. Anthony, the leader in the women’s rights movement, has voted at the last Presidential election, and was branded as a criminal who refuses to follow the U.S. Law. However, in this speech, she asserts that she has not committed crime, but only is simply aware of her and all United States citizens’ rights. Anthony, as one of the suffragettes, justifies her decision of voting and clarifies her firm favor of women’s suffrage. In this passage, she uses various types of argument in order to convince the audience via three strategies: appeals to authorities, stylistic choices, rhetorical question, and appeal to emotions.

Susan B. Anthony has been an equal rights activist (specifically women’s rights) for most of her life. She began fighting for women’s rights when she became a teacher, and during this time she realized that male teachers earned four times the amount women did. During the election of 1872, she was arrested for illegally voting. Anthony was not allowed to testify and was charged with a one hundred dollar fine, and to that, she famously denied, “I shall never pay a dollar of your unjust penalty.” Instead of paying, she delivered a speech about women’s suffrage all over the country.

L i t e r a r y E s s a y The passages “Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote” and “Don’t Give Up the Fight” share a common theme of hard work. In both of these passages, the characters work hard to achieve a goal. In “Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote,” Susan B Anthony’s goal is to earn United States women the right to vote.

Whether it be social discrimination or women’s rights, people in the history of the United States have been fighting for equal rights. The poem “Sympathy” by Paul Laurence Dunbar and the speech titled “After Being Convicted of Voting in the 1872 Presidential Election” by Susan B. Anthony both have similarities and differences. They are similar with their central idea and author’s purpose; they are different in how their supporting details are executed. The two pieces share the central idea of “an aspiration for equal rights” and a similar author’s purpose. Both the speech and the poem share the plea of the author, whether it is an emotional plea or a political plea.

In America’s history, child labor was fiercely criticized. Many activists of child labor laws and women’s suffrage strived to introduce their own viewpoints to the country. Florence Kelley was a reformer who successfully changed the mindset of many Americans through her powerful and persuading arguments. Florence Kelley’s carefully crafted rhetoric strategies such as pathos, repetition, and sarcasm generates an effective and thought provoking tone that was in favor of women’s suffrage and child labor laws. Florence Kelley uses pathos continuously throughout her speech.

This shows that she has experience with this problem, she is not just coming out with her opinion without actually having any problems and expecting people to listen to her. For this main idea she is using ethos. It shows that she knows what she is talking about because she has been through it. She is not just some random person telling their opinion with no experience on the topic. First she says, “I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote.”

She “[appeals] to logic” (Austin 652). The evidence you provide also helps to reinforce your position of logos in the video. Secondly, your second body paragraph explains ethos well, and you provide good examples from the video “Drunk History: John Adams vs.

Winfrey then utilizes figurative language to emphasize how indebted she feels towards Parks. To demonstrate how grateful she is that Rosa Parks did not move out of her seat she writes, “I know that. I know that. I know that. I know that, and I honor that” (Winfrey Par. 2).

The two speeches were from people who experienced being a victim of prejudice. Anthony informs her audience early on of how she was arrested for voting. During that time it was illegal for women casting their votes in presidential elections. Wiesel as well uses the first few lines of his speech to reflect