Rhetorical Analysis Of The War For Independence

1096 Words5 Pages

The War for Independence, which lasted from 1776 to 1783, was a defining moment in American history. It was a period marked by intense revolutionary rhetoric, which aimed to break free from the British monarchy and establish a new democratic republic in America. The question of whether the young American Republic upheld this revolutionary rhetoric is a complex one, with no easy answer. To begin to answer this question, it is important to examine the nature of the rhetoric that emerged during the War for Independence and to understand the ways in which it was translated into policy and practice in the years that followed.

One of the key themes that emerged during the War for Independence was the idea of popular sovereignty. The colonists argued …show more content…

For example, the Constitution, which was written in 1787, established a government that was designed to be accountable to the people. The Constitution provided for regular elections, and it created a system of checks and balances that was intended to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. Additionally, the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution in 1791, protected individual liberties, such as the freedom of speech, religion, and the …show more content…

Instead, the delegates drafted an entirely new constitution that established a stronger federal government with three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial. This new constitution was ratified in 1788 and became the supreme law of the land.

While the new Constitution did establish a stronger federal government, it also upheld the revolutionary rhetoric of republicanism. The Constitution provided for regular elections, and it created a system of checks and balances that was intended to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. Additionally, the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution in 1791, protected individual liberties and ensured that the government was accountable to the people.

However, it is important to note that the United States did not always uphold the idea of republicanism. For example, the practice of gerrymandering, or manipulating electoral districts to benefit one political party, has been used to undermine the principle of fair representation. Additionally, the influence of money in politics has raised questions about whether the government is truly accountable to the

Open Document