Situation Analysis The audience for this essay will be Professor Carrie Sample, instructor of my English 111 course, and my classmates in my Ivy Tech online course. The objective of my essay is to summarize, describe, and respond to one of multiple articles or videos that each student in my course read through. The articles/video my classmates and I read through pertained to food, but each article/video had their own differences and similarities. The topic of my essay revolves around Farmers’ markets and the fact that people shop at them thinking they are healthy for the environment, when in reality they are not. The author of the article I chose talks about how people who shop at farmers’ markets think they are saints, because they are “helping” the environment. I hope my summary and response will allow the …show more content…
There is no need for them to be locked up as birds in each flock are protected from predators 24 hours a day by their guard dogs. (http://www.freeranger.com.au) The author then goes on to talk about “Locavores”, which a people who basically think they are saints or “doing the lord’s work” by shopping at their local farmers’ markets. The author learned the term “Locavores through American blogger Stephen Budiansky. Overall, the author concludes that these people at farmers’ markets to feel better about themselves. I don’t agree with this at all, I think most people that shop at their local farmers’ markets do it, because it’s a healthier life choice for them and their families then the grocery store. As I have previously stated, the author went back and forth describing the way some people feel that they are saint because they shop at their local farmers’ markets. However, he tells us that just because you are supporting and leaving a “carbon footprint” that doesn’t quite mean you are doing good. The author
I think you are right about the price aspect. I also will try and pick up the organic option if the price is reasonable. It sounds like you definitely have a good approach to both authors writing and were able to analyse both of them in a way that saw through the rhetoric. I also agree with your comments on the “shopping green makes you mean” question. To attack people who choose to buy a specific kind of food seems a bit
On 02/28/2017 at approximately 0330 hours, deputies were dispatched to 624 N. Market in Caldwell, KS. Dispatch advised a physical disturbance had just occurred between a mother and her son, the son left the house on foot. All of the doors were locked at the house so he could not get back inside. When I arrived in the area I parked to the south of the house and waited for backup to arrive. Deputy Marks #134
On December 5, 2012, Daisy Luther, a journalist from Northern California wrote a blog entry on the conspiracy surrounding “certified organic” labels that is claimed by some companies and retailers. She brings up the question of whether these labels being stamped on food can really be verified or are they just a way to empty out the wallets of consumers. In the website The Organic Pepper, the blogger generally gives advice for different problems people encounter on a daily basis. Through her blog entries varying from ways to stay healthy to frugal living, Luther states her opinion of governmental interference on our food supply by citing sources from articles from Natural News and Time Magazine. She first starts out by arguing about how the
The author's use of a compare/contrast structure and the appeal to ethos to support her claim was effective. However, her use of the hasty generalization and “Red Herring” fallacies caused the audience to doubt her claim, that meat from traditional farms was better for the environment, had sufficient evidence to
For instance he considers Joel Alatin's opinion about "vegetarian utopia" that it is supported by animal rights activists,although it is a fact that in some places people cannot grow crops because the environment is not able to do it and the author has witness this in his own country where rain does not occur enough to grow crops. "Vegetarian utopia" illustrates a place where people stopped eating meat, but then they would need enormous portions of vegetables which would be unnatural and bad for the health of the environment as farmers would use chemicals to adapt in the new increased demand which would harm the earth and all the living organisms that live upon it. With logos the author wins his audience trust and inclines them to his ideas by leading them with reasons and using
The article was written in response to the statement farming and food production is leading to climate change. Niman, being a rancher who raises cattle, goats, and turkeys, effectively frames the situation logically by providing credible statistics and examples to help the reader better understand the impacts of different methods of food production. She does this by providing specific information regarding the greenhouse gases involved, being carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxides. Niman, the rhetor, has written this article to try and inform the readers about the differences between traditional style and industrial style methods of food production. She has directed the article towards those concerned about the carbon footprint, we as individuals, are leaving
Jonathan Bloom authored a book about food waste in America called, American Wasteland. Bloom describes societal norms and values that contribute to food waste. Bloom is successful in getting his message across by effectively using phrases such as “food insecurity”, “cultural waste”, and “cultural shift” to highlight the severity of the issue, challenge societal norms, and encourage readers to act. Bloom uses the phrase “food insecurity” to describe the lack of access to enough food for an active and healthy life for some Americans.
Rhetorical Analysis of “Attention Whole Foods Shoppers” In “Attention Whole Foods Shoppers” by Robert Paarlberg, the main emphasis in the article is that there is a struggle to feed people, particularly in South Africa and Asia due to economic and population issues. His focus is on the lack of involvement of countries around the world that do have food. Throughout the article, Paarlberg talks about how organic agriculture is not going to feed the world and exposes myths about organic food and industrial scale food.
Due to McWilliams’ strong claim, evidence, warrant, backing, and rebuttal to counter arguments, his argument is therefore an effective one, according to the Toulmin method. The most important and key components, that are vital to an argument, are the argument’s claim, qualifiers, as well as the evidence the author uses to support their argument. If there were no claim, then the author has no firm stance or basis for their argument, because they would have nothing to defend or persuade their readers of. The claim James E. McWilliams makes in the article “The Locavore movement: Why Buying from Nearby Farmers Won’t Save the Planet” is that since there are so many factors that are attributed to the destruction of the earth and the waste of tons of energy ,that the locavore movement is not quite saving the planet simply by focusing
Gardening is an activity many Americans already partake in. However, Pollan digs deeper and illustrates the positive outcomes of this simple task. To support his argument he proposes if we grow a small portion of our own food we will rely on the shopping centers less. We won’t be driving to the stores as often, so that is less fuel emission in the air. If we are out in the yard gardening we won’t be using the electricity inside the house, which saves energy.
Seifert calls upon individuals to seek and inquire about the food they consume. Seifert hadn’t simply “Googled” information offered on the internet and leave it at that, he took steps to seek answers to the question no one want to acknowledge. His journey is one students taking argumentation or critical thinking courses can take important lessons in patience, persistence and perseverance from. If students do not make efforts to be informed about the world they live in, they relinquish their rights as consumers to the major companies that are powerful adversaries, even at the state and federal
After discussing the triumphs as a result of the recently newfound sustainability movement, a tone switch occurs, in which Budnik transitions into a more stern perspective to set up the first part of his argument. The tone switch occurs when Budnik wrote, “The truth is sustainability is a privilege not many can afford, and shunning the average consumer for not making sustainable decisions is not the answer to our environmental crises.” This tone switch makes Budnik’s application of pathos more powerful. Budnik applies examples of pathos to appeal to his audience’s emotions as a way to convince his audience that sustainable substitutes are too costly for the lower class. As an example of repetition, Budnik conveys, “How can you expect someone to worry about the greenhouse gas emissions that have been produced by the food that they’re
We were asked to read two articles one was “On Buying Local” by Katherine Spriggs and the other was “What’s Eating America” by Michael Pollan. In the article “On Buying Local,” Spriggs showed a great use of logos when she stated that it was better for us to buy locally because it was better for the environment. Spriggs gives us several reasons why we should give up “a little bit of convenience” in favor of helping the environment. Farmers wouldn’t have to lose their farms to larger farms, smaller farms could be more sustainable by using natural and local resources, and there would be fewer emissions. This idea has been meeting with some opposition people worry of economic damage, but Spriggs has shown the argument and counterarguments with the proof of how the argument is flawed.
They provided us with testimonies that proved their finding more relevant insight into the real cause of climate change and the ability to cut back on meat. Proving that factory farming is the leading issue for the environment. As Oppenlander stated, even if we were to remove every single carbon-producing industry, we would still exceed our 565 gigatons of carbon-equivalent greenhouse gases with agricultural farming (Cowspiracy). This places the impact of animal agriculture rate at producing emissions. These experts give legitimacy to the film’s claims and aid in the foundation of Andersen and Kuhn as reliable sources of
He lets consumers know that just because he's a homeless person it doesn't mean that his opinion shouldn't matter but he knows about the circumstances because he was once a consumer and he gives insight of both sides. This essay makes wonder whether consumers will see what Eighner is trying to show them. Will society see how much produce is wasted? Are people going to think about what they throw out in the trash? Will the amount of wasted product decline, stay neutral, or will it