Social Analysis Proposal
Copyright
Should the government allow digital publishers to place locks on their content (mp3s, etc).
Huai Chen
Qinghuan Deng
Young Keun Lee
Yuk Lun Tang
Global Citizenship and Equity GNED 500
Professor: Milan Jelenic, PhD
October 22, 2015
1 - What is the social problem/issue that you will be researching (your topic)?
Should government allow digital publishers to place locks on their content mp3, etc.
2 - What do you currently know about this topic?
It is about digital copyright. The government of Canada just submitted the copyright reform. It is called Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-11), the bill is called to update copyright system which last revise in 1997. It means that it’s illegal to break digital
…show more content…
(2012, February 28). Unlocking Bill C-11: What are digital locks, and why should you care? – The Fulcrum. Retrieved October 21, 2015, from http://thefulcrum.ca/news/unlocking-bill-c-11-what-are-digital-locks-and-why-should-you-care/
The author explains what digital locks are. He also points out current situation of Canada copyright environment which it’s time to update. But government is not sure whether make any major changes to the Bill C-11.Bedsides; he compares Bill C-11 with SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act). Through Detailed Analysis, this is a good source to support the point digital locks are necessary for Canada. It not only provides additional protection for rights holders but also balances the business market. SAGANASH, R. (2011, December 12). Stop Making Our Copyright and Digital Laws Worse. Retrieved October 22, 2015, from
…show more content…
He also states that while publishers have the right to place digital locks on their products to prevent piracy, but should not be used to prevent legitimate consumers from accessing their paid content. This article provides very good points for further analysis, a good base for us to expand on for our research paper.
Washington University in St. Louis. (2013, August 1). Case study: A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. Retrieved October 22, 2015 from https://onlinelaw.wustl.edu/blog/case-study-am-records-inc-v-napster-inc/
This case study describes from WU’s School of Law examines the case between Napster and A&M records where A&M brought a law suit against Napster for infringement on intellectual property rights. The case introduces us to Napster, a peer-to-peer file sharing platform that was designed for the purpose of sharing music files, and presents us to the arguments of both sides. This source is an excellent starting point for understanding the beginning of the effect the internet had on companies such as A&M. It introduces the reader the both sides of the argument, written by a reliable source (Washington
Copyright infringement case Name: Institution: Introduction Since time immemorial, there have been many copyright cases all over the world, with the likes of Millet versus Snowden case dominating the courts in the 1800s. Many describe it as a “global scourge”. Copyright cases have never been easy to handle, and they usually happen from time to time. As such, there has been a lot of wrangles over copyright between artists, of which most have ended up in court. According to Tehranian (2011), copyright infringement refers to the act of breaking some or all of a copyright creator’s select rights approved by the federal Copyright Act.
Judges will need to grapple with virtual break-ins and digital theft. They may even need to decide if activities like virtual reality heists can be considered burglary. The future holds uncertainty, but one thing is clear: burglary laws will adapt to safeguard
Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA ) have the involved of the intervene to the Piracy in the entertainment industry, because after the failure of SOPA and PIPA. They claimed the piracy of many websites had not responsible for the domain name, the contents storage in hosting services and the search engines involved Google, those are impacts to their "lagging progress". And they were ask for help of the U.S Government, and that is encourage by "Obama administration". In this article, MPAA of Hollywood got the rights to invite and 3 biggest industries of the world which is ICANN domain name, Hosting services, and Search Engines to work together in order to get the unification of stakeholders.
DMCA 's “anti-circumvention” provisions have been used to repress a wide array of legitimate activites. Numerous reports show that DMCA has been used to stifle free speech and scientific research. Banning all of the circumvention acts gives corporations the power to eliminate the public 's fair use rights. The movie industry’s use of encryption on DVDs has crippled consumers’ ability to make personal-use copies of movies they have purchased. Youtube 's 3 strike policy allows the owner of the content to ban channels that critisize their product.
As mentioned in the article “Many observers believed that these measures were quite effective in protecting the small remaining share of Canada's domestically produced magazines.” Fewer
Censorship of The First Amendment This paper will discuss how censorship denies citizens of the United States our full rights as delineated in the First Amendment. It will outline how and why the first amendment was created and included in the Constitution of the United States of America. This paper will also define censorship, discuss a select few legal cases surrounding freedom of speech and censorship as well as provide national and local examples of censorship.
This trial is on Walt Disney Studios vs. Faden on the work Professor faden made to inform people on copyright, fair use and infringement. They are battling over copyright and fair use on this video. Walt Disney Studios claims that Faden’s work is copyrighted and is suing for infringement. But Professor Faden claims that he followed all the rules on copyright and he thinks it is fair use. “ Defendence you make take your stands,”The judge says in an assertive voice.
INTRODUCTION Now with the copyright law, Copyright Act, Chapter 63 established on 1987 with the new revised version on 2006, any author who creates their own original works automatically has the privilege to have copyright protection. Original works means works that are created with own effort and through processes of developed ideas and their whole new way to express their ideas in their final product. Not only are the works protected in their own country but also countries that signed the international agreements. Meaning works are protected in countries that signed the international agreements with the same effect as though the works was made there. Therefore, works cannot be produced without permission in another country.
People have discovered ways to gain free access to intellectual properties via the internet. Piracy has seemingly become a threat to the economy of companies that own an intellectual product because it causes them to lose their profit. Internet Piracy gives people access to media without having them pay and allows them the comfort of just downloading a file or even streaming from the internet. Piracy is considered by most as morally wrong and degrading the quality and reputation of certain intellectual properties. Internet piracy is an immoral act which has been thought of as equal to stealing.
It followed domestic debates about the intellectual property of literary works. It is only in 1777, promoted by Beaumarchais, and in 1790, with the Article 1, Section 8 in the U.S. Constitution, also known as the Copyright Act, that the French and American intellectual property laws were created. Since the 1886 Berne Convention, and then with the creation of the UN World Intellectual Property Organization agency in 1967, IP laws have acquired an international dimension, which one can argue is consistent with the constant globalisation of the creative and cultural industries. All IP laws share a common definition of ‘copyright’, characterised by WIPO as “a legal term used to describe the rights that creators have over their literary and artistic works”. The varied copyrighted works include ‘literary works, computer programs, films, music, choreographies, artistic works, architecture, advertisements, maps, and technical drawings’ (Wipo.int, n.d.).
Multiple parents have sued public libraries for allowing their children to access pornography on the internet due to inadequate filters. In fact, many parents are quick to believe that libraries “have an ethical duty to protect their children” (Wyatt). However, it is not part of a librarian’s job to monitor children in libraries, and filters in place cause parents to believe that their children are safe under false pretenses. Officially, a public court maintained that “unsupervised use of computers is not a creation of danger” (Wyatt). Many students have access to unsupervised computers and can reach improperly filtered information, even though the parents believe that their children are protected from this.
Even though, the Act provides for their grant to any applicant fulfilling the pre-conditions. CONCLUSION There is much to be discussed by Courts in determining various aspects of granting compulsory licenses since there is a dearth of solid precedent on the same. Even though the compliance with international conventions have enabled Copyright Act to deal with it, there are a lot of procedural loopholes because of which the industry faces an infraction of their rights to use copyrighted material. After the merging of the Copyright Board with the IPAB, it is only expected such inadequacies would be dealt
(Brassell and King, 2013) Economic growth The WIPO treaty and numerous associated international agreements emphasize that the protection of intellectual property rights is vital to maintaining economic growth. The WIPO IP Handbook gives two reasons for intellectual property
Copyright piracy is a phenomenon prevalent worldwide. Piracy means unauthorised reproduction, importing or distribution either of the whole or of a substantial part of works protected by copyright. The author of a copyrighted work, being the owner, enjoys certain exclusive rights with respect to his or her works. These include right to reproduce, to publish, to adopt, to translate and to perform in public. The owner can also sell, assign, license or bequeath the copyright to another party if he wishes so.
Tougher laws won’t solve the problems that copyright is fighting in today’s world, like piracy. Increasing the penalties will only make the problem bigger. Like Oscar Wilde said: “the best way to get rid of temptation is drooped into it.” This means that people will infringe copyright no matter what.