Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

875 Words4 Pages

In Nicholas Carr, Is google making us stupid, He emphasizes on many points,the main point being , how before the creation of the internet people had to spend hours and hours in the libraries looking for the right articles, but now with the creation of the internet things can get done faster and more efficiently. He also he argues that before the creation of the Internet people that loved to read and that had degrees related to reading found themselves less into reading when computers started to make an uprising. He also argues that the internet is being a primary source and now and it’s affecting our reading habits and demolishing our brains. In Clive Thompson, Smarter than you think, He’s trying to convince his readers that the internet …show more content…

He mostly relates his article to the game of chess and makes the point that no matter how good you are with your critical thinking once the internet is added into the “mix” the internet gives the players the upper hand because no one is able to think of as many possible moves as the internet. The internet will continue to shape our critical thinking as it brings more tools to our brains.
While, I mostly agree with Thompson there are some valid points that Carr makes as well. I agree mostly with Thompson because he is saying the internet is shaping our critical thinking and we, as human, don’t realize how we are being affected. One clear point I agree with from Carr is "I'm not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I'm reading….I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I'm …show more content…

He states “Our tools are everywhere, linked with our minds,working in tandem.Search engines give us an ESP-like awareness those around us; ONline collaboration let far-flung collaborators tackle problems too tangle for any individuals. We’re becoming less like rodin’s thinkers and more like kasparov’s centaurs.(P.347)” This to me means that we are moving away from our critical thinking and are relying more on the internet. Another point that's made by Thompson is “Every new tool shapes the way we think, as well as what we think about. What this means is the things that are being continuously made are changing our critical thinking skills. Thompson central claim is that computers are not as smart as humans, but once you have been using them over a certain amount of time you seem to get better at working them and that’s what really makes you more efficient in using them. The point that I don’t agree with Carr on is “Their thoughts and actions fell scripped, as if they're following the steps of an algorithm (p.328.)” I don’t agree with Carr’s argument here because he’s emphasizing that human thoughts are being scripted and we don’t think about things critically, but not all of our thinking

Open Document