Summary Of Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals

In the article titled "A Change of Heart About Animals," (2003), author Jeremy Rifkin addresses that contrary to previous research and discovery, new breakthroughs in science are finding that animals are more comparable to humans than we once thought, and as a result, human empathy should be extended towards them. Rifkin supports his claim by providing numerous examples of studies that show capabilities of animals to make tools (crows), develop complex language skills (Gorilla), and present signs of self-awareness (Orangutan); things once believed only to be human characteristics (Rifkin 7, 8, 10). The author's purpose is to inform and convince the readers that empathy should be inclusive to all animals by providing a multitude of studies,

Jeremy Rifkin, the president of the Foundation on Economic Trends in Washington D.C and author of “A Change of Heart About Animals” (2003), argues in this article that animals are much more like humans than we thought and that we should expand our empathy to our fellow creatures. Rifkin develops his thesis by comparing the similarities between humans and animals. An example of this is in paragraph 11 when he claims that animals show a sense of their own mortality and the mortality of their kin just like humans do. He supports this claim by giving an example of elephants standing next to their dead children for days after they have passed. The author gives that example of the elephants in order to make the reader understands just how aware these

Your newspaper recently published an editorial by Jeremy Rifkin author of the Biotech Century “A Change of heart about animals” in which he suggests that animals deserve empathy from humans because they are also capable of intelligence. Rifkin explains many studies on animals that have proven that animals are intelligent and for that reason they deserve empathy(33-34).I'm of two minds about Jeremy Rifkin's claim that empathy should be extended to animals. On the one hand, I agree that animals are more like us than we think, so empathy shall be given to them. On the other hand, I'm not sure if extending empathy to animals is a good idea because it would affect the economy, slow down medical advancements, and hurt humans by having to convert to a meat free diet (vegetarians).

Teresa Platt is an executive director for the Fur Commission U.S.A. division which works on behalf of mink farmers and furriers. The Fur Commission U.S.A represents over 600 mink and fox farming families in nearly 31 states. Throughout the article “Radical Animal Rights Groups Harm Society,” Platt describes to the reader how several animal rights and environmental groups such as the Animal Liberation Front, or the ALF, and the Earth Liberation Front, or the ELF, discriminate against honest farmers. She also claims that radical environmentalists vandalize mink and dairy farmers with the assumption that people can live without misusing animals. Lastly, she maintains that people have always depended on animal products such as food and clothing for survival.

The Hindu religious traditions and practices with regards to the perspective on animals is that nature is sacred, with God and nature being one and the same (Kemmerer p 56). Animals and World Religions by Lisa Kemmerer is a book written about how religions of the world view non human animals. Chapter 2, Hindu Traditions, focuses on the role of non human animals in the Hindu religion. Kemmerer starts out by giving some details about the background of the Hindu religion. Hindu verses or scriptures and traditions date back nearly four thousand years in India (Kemmerer p 56).

Gabriel, Gonzalez Period.4 Mrs.Moreh ERWCA Animals. Rifkin has a point and has good solid evidence on his argument. He has one belief but other people believe in something else. Many people see animals a different way, some people just see them as pets others see them as part of their family which is nothing wrong believe me everybody has different perspectives of how they see things.

In the article, it gives light to the issue that animals are under full control of humans and are held captive against their will in places like zoos and circuses. Captivity is a major issue and strips animals of their freedom. In captivity,

They are more like us than we imagined…” these words written by Jeremy Rifkin in his article “A Change of Heart about Animals,” emphasize that like us humans, animals feel pain as well. Equivalently, Rifkin insists on the point that we need to change our ways in which we treat animals or in other words limit ourselves to a certain level of fair treatment with them. Alike us, they feel pain and suffer in many ways in cause of our actions towards them and it is not fair for an animal to be attacked this way by us humans when they as well are living their own lives and are already trying to survive themselves. In support of this, I am with Jeremy Rifkin and agree that our actions towards animals need either a change or limit. Researchers have found that animals feel pain, suffer, experience stress, affection, excitement and even love.

When talking about justice, it becomes problematic to define the concepts and understand who should be the receiver and in what way they should receive justice. Nevertheless, for humans, there is always someone being an advocate for their rights, at least the person interested in a government or a society respecting their own human rights. For animals it is another story since animals do not have the option of communicating and fighting for their rights alone, people need to be the advocates of this group. In recent times, the justice that needs to be given towards animals has become an ardent issue with different opinions in the matter. These opinions, however, need a basic theory of justice to base their arguments and legitimize them.

Gender roles and expectations “This is your heritage, he said, as if from this dance we could know about his own childhood, about the flavor and grit of tenement buildings in Spanish Harlem, and projects in Red Hook, and dance halls, and city parks, and about his own Paps, how he beat him, how he taught him to dance, as if we could hear Spanish in his movements, as if Puerto Rico was a man in a bathrobe, grabbing another beer from the fridge and raising it to drink, his head back, still dancing, still steeping and snapping perfectly in time.” (Torres, 10). Within We the Animals by Justin Torres, we find a sad narrative of anger depression and woe. The main focus of said story is how family dynamics and real life experiences led a child to

“According to the ASPCA, an animal is abused every 10 seconds in this country”(Rosenthal). Every single day many animals are being beaten, starved, and neglected by their owners. Animal cruelty is growing rapidly in today's society, and the popularity is vast among the nation. Animal abuse can be simply leaving a dog in the car while one quickly runs into the grocery store for a couple of minutes. Due to this, many commit the crime without knowing it.

He incorporates ethos pathos and logos into his essay. People have been raised thinking its okay to kill animals just to eat them. Why do we raise animals just to kill them? Yes, eating meat

The article written by John Rossi and Samual Garner extensively discuss the issues of animal welfare and the changes that have been made of the production of animal byproducts for human consumption. This article critiques the morality and principles of animal agriculture, but first Rossi and Garner introduce the reader to the issue followed by a description of what a factory farm is? The authors go into great detail this issue discussing the various costs that society has to burden due to animal agriculture. Following this Rossi and Garner talk about the numerous claims for and against animal agriculture. They conclude their 44 page article with a final ethical critique of factory farming.

All these are certainly enough to intrigue even the most minimally curious among us. But do they provide support for the view that these beings have moral rights?” (1986/87, p.192-193) This article highlights irreconcilable conflict between the two sides. Jan Narveson addresses Tom Regan, the author of The Case for Animal Rights, “he in the preceding argument, refers to just anybody who doesn 't already accept whatever moral principle we are trying to establish.

Animals are loved one way or another by most human beings. Whether it is loving them because they are a source of food or adoring them because they consider them family. As a result of this, many people start to contradict one another saying animals should not have rights while others say they should. Animal Activists are exacting that animals should have rights that protect them from discrimination, abuse, and neglect that are mostly targeted towards home animals. In the end there is a difference between how you treat a domestic animal and a farm animal.