Summary Of Susan B Anthony On Women's Right To Vote

This is a letter that was sent by Abigail Adams to her husband, John Adams, one of the most influential leaders of the American Revolution, at Braintree in Massachusetts on 31 March 1776, to take women’s rights into consideration when drafting new laws. This letter is part of the collection of missives more than 1,100 that John and Abigail exchanged during his nearly fifty years of married life and have a great historic important role. In them, the dreams of youth's ambitious lawyer, complaints of abandonment of his wife Abigail during the years when her husband was sent to Europe to strengthen the independence of the thirteen American colonies and political issues are recounted.

Semester 1 Final Question #51 Some stories/events we discuss in class is the 19th amendment,The 19th amendment was about the women suffrage and the right to vote,it was known as the woman suffrage. It was all ratified August 18,1920,” The U.S was founded its a female citizen and it diddnt share all of the rights as men”,And giving the rights to vote,It all diddnt happen until 1848, then the movement for women the women rights launched on a national level with a convention with the Seneca Falls, And it was all organized by oblitionist Elizebth Cady Stanton and Lucreita Mott. Also after 70 years of all the fighting they finally got it to come togther and fall in place with the passage of the 19th amendment. The

To start off, in the first paragraph, Susan B Anthony introduces her topic. She speaks on the woman right to vote and explains she has been charged for the crime of voting. To support that voting as a woman should not be a crime, she uses the national constitution as evidence. “It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only

The rights that all citizens have were ensured by the constitution and therefore they cannot be denied by a law pass by the state. Anthony assured that a law that takes away women’s rights to vote because of their gender is a “violation to the supreme law of the land” (19). If their rights were to be revoke half of the country would become superior to the other causing the rights of liberty and equality to disappear. Denying the rights of a woman based on her gender makes the country less of a democracy and more of an aristocracy (Anthony 19). The country was built upon equality for all but if women were not included than equality would never be

By using the countries’ own governmental document, Anthony masterfully poses, “In this very first paragraph of the declaration, is the assertion of the natural right of all to the ballot; for, how can “the consent of the governed” be given, if the right to vote be denied. Again: ‘That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles’” (Anthony par. 4-5). Women are citizens of the United States who are governed, yet they have no say in their government.

The author, a 19th century women’ rights leader, intends to justify her voting act was not a crime but rather an act based on her constitutional rights and further claims that since all women are also people, all women should not be discriminated because of their gender: just like how negroes should not be segregated because of their skin color. In order to effectively and strongly build her argument, the writer, Susan Anthony uses various writing techniques: use of emotional and deep-seated terminologies to describe the unfair intolerance; analogies with the ‘negroes’ engage the readers; repetition of phrases to emphasize her statement. First of all, the use of the narrator’s sentimental words and phrases enhances her argument’s verity and

Women used many different methods to earn the right to vote in the Women’s Suffrage Movement. One method women used to earn support is that they organized a parade in Washington, D.C., the same day the president was coming into town so that there was large crowds. Many of the people in the crowd were men who, along with drinking also disagreed with the right for women to vote. They began to yell then even throw objects at the women walking in the parade. Eventually, the police walked away giving the men the opportunity to attack.

Susan B Anthony was a woman advocating women's suffrage. She recognized that without the right to vote women would keep fighting the same battle for equality over and over again. She traveled many miles, giving hundreds of speeches, gathering thousands of signatures on a petition to press for womens suffrage. One way the documents are the same is they both have the same wording. One example of this is they both say, “We hold these truths to be self-evident.”

In Anthony’s speech, she states the democratic-republican government ideology which was that, “the natural rights of every individual member thereof to a voice and a vote in making and executing the law." Therefore conveying that women have the right to exercise their

The women’s suffrage movement was a very difficult time for these women at the time. On June 20, 1908 is when the suffrage day happened and everyone was there including the women who wanted their right to vote. The women went through some difficulties to get their right to vote. Speeches were being given that day. Four years later a march happened.

Numerous women expressed their disapproval towards how they were denied their rights based on their gender, thus causing women to take a stand for their suffrage and rights. In a letter to her husband, Abigail Adams told him to “be more generous and favourable to [women] than [his]

Comparison Between On the Right of Women to Vote and the Perils of Indifference Speeches “On the Right of Women to Vote by Suzan B. Anthony and “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel are among the most popular and significant speeches in the United States of America. Suzan B. Anthony made this speech in 1872 when she was accused to vote illegally. Elie Wiesel made his speech in 1999 where he was invited as intellectual to participate in Millennium Lecture Series. Although these speeches have some apparent similarities, the differences between them are also remarkable.

For a very long time, the voting rights of the citizens have been a problem in the US. It started out with only men with land being able to vote, and then expanded to white men, and then to all men. However, women were never in the situation, they were disregarded and believed to not be worthy enough to have the same rights as men. They were essentially being treated as property, therefore having no rights. But, in Susan B. Anthony’s speech, she hits upon the point that women are just as righteous as men.

Thesis Proposal Title The impact women’s right to vote had on economic growth in the U.S, as women in integrated into the labour force from the 1920’s to the 1990’s. Background Prior to the 1920s, before women got their right to vote in America. They took up in the more subservient role in society, they were not seen as equal to the men.

Susan B. Anthony, a woman who was arrested for illegally voting in the president election of 1872, in her “On Women's Right to Vote” speech, argues that women deserve to be treated as citizens of America and be able to vote and have all the rights that white males in America have. She begins by introducing her purpose, then provides evidence of how women are citizens of America, not just males by using the preamble of the Constitution, then goes on about the how this problem has became a big problem and occurs in every home in the nation, and finally states that women deserve rights because the discrimination against them is not valid because the laws and constitutions give rights to every CITIZEN in America. Anthony purpose is to make the woman of America realize that the treatment and limitations that hold them back are not correct because they are citizens and they deserve to be treated like one. She adopts a expressive and confident tone to encourage and light the hearts of American woman. To make her speech effective, she incorporates ethos in her speech to support her claims and reasons.