Supreme Court Case Study: To Sikhs The Kirpan

One must have evidence that a disturbance has been make. Fear cannot take away freedom. In one of the court cases mentioned, it says, “the vigilant protection of constitutional freedoms is nowhere more vital than in the community of American schools,” (13). This is saying that our constitutional freedoms are most valuable in American school communities. The freedom of expression is one of the reasons that makes America a superior country.

Justice Fortas explained the majority opinion of the Supreme Court in the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. One of the main points Justice Fortas maintained was that the right of freedom of speech extends onto the school grounds. Fortas explained that wearing a black armband to school did not cause disruptions to the learning in the school and is a pure form of free speech that is protected in the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. Fortas continued to explain that the wearing of the black armbands to school is protected under the Fourteen Amendment. This amendment prevents interference in the liberties of teachers, students and parents.

When you think about the first Amendment of the United States Constitution it ensures the peoples privilege opportunity of religion, and flexibility of expression from the government. Because this opportunity of expression comprises the rights to be able to speak freely, get together, and to appeal to the legislature for a change of grievances, and the inferred privileges of affiliation and conviction. The First Amendment has two procurements concerning religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment statement forbids the administration from "building up" a religion. The exact meaning of "foundation" is hazy.

According to the First Amendment, Congress cannot forbid freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits United States citizens from being denied rights (US Const.). In the Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Trial, seven students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. The incident occurred in December to encourage a ceasefire between North Vietnam and South Vietnam over the holidays. The students were immediately suspended after wearing the controversial armbands (LII).

The negative sides of the charter are another idea that was taken away from the reading of the article, it is stated that there is an inequality with peoples access to courts and that

4. A sword protects yourself and others, additionally; the sword reminds them that they must fight for injustice. 5. Long underwear to properly cover their private parts. (Sikhism101 A Brief History)

Although the Good News Club claims that they are being discriminated for their opinions, this case raises the issue of a government run public school explicitly supporting religion. Both the District Court of New York as well as the Court of Appeals hold that the public school’s religious discrimination was constitutional because there is no separation between religion and the activities of the Good News Club. Despite the lower court's rulings the Supreme Court holds that the school created unconstitutional religious discrimination since religious groups may not be excluded from participating in a limited public forum, as long as the group is only performing permitted activities from a religious viewpoint. This case follows the both the narrow and literal interpretation of the Establishment Clause, which follow the belief that the government is simply not able to declare a national religion or provide government preferential support to a religion. On the other hand, supporters of Jefferson and Madison’s ideal on the wall of separation between church and state would favor that exclusion.

How does the Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms protect Canadians as individuals? Many Canadians know that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is part of Canada’s Constitution. The Charter protects every Canadian’s right to be treated equally under the law. The Charter guarantees, for all Canadians, Fundamental Freedoms, Mobility Rights and Legal Rights. Under the Charter in the section entitled Fundamental Freedoms”, Canadians have the right and freedom to express their own opinions, choose their own religion, to organize peaceful meetings and demonstrations and also the freedom to associate with any person or group.

People should have the right to defend themselves judicially and should obviously have the right to religious

While religion is in no way defined in these two clauses, the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, we do know that laws respecting religion 's establishment are prohibited, as are laws precluding its free exercise. The interpretation and application of the First Amendment 's religion clauses has been the peculiar province of the judiciary, especially the U.S. Supreme Court, and particularly since roughly the midpoint of the 20th century. Although several cases concerning these clauses transpired in the 19th century, the effective "making sense" of the two clauses began in the 1940s, beginning with the case of Cantwell v. Connecticut in 1940. In Cantwell, the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that the Free Exercise Clause applied to the states as well as to the national government. However, for most of the rest of the 20th century, the primary work of the Court with the religion clauses centered on the Establishment Clause, beginning with the case of Everson v. Board of Education of Ewing Township, New

The cases that are most controversial often deal with when people think that something is wrong. For example, a very heavily debated issue currently is LGBTQIA+ topics and rights and whether they should be allowed in books in schools and in schools in general, whether or not gay marriage should be legal and many other things(see more related cases in the article "Notable First Amendment Court Cases"). The first amendment isn’t going too far when it allows those who are part of the LGBTQIA+ to express themselves through their freedoms just as other people get to and not having to worry about whether their books or thoughts or who they marry will be allowed because, after all, they are people just like all every other

In my eyes the solution to this problem is to make the ruling based upon protection of a person’s wellbeing first. I don’t believe it fair for one person to endanger another person or a group of people just so that they can express what they believe. A person’s safety is something sacred that a society should work to protect. This works around something called the reasonable limits clause6, which works to protect all rights up until they promote hate speech, violence or inequality. To solve conflicts I believe it best serves the interest of the people to violate the right that could endanger another person.

The text states, “The superintendent did have enormous power of initiative in virtually all matters concerning the schools: the appointment of staff, the selection of textbooks, plans and contracts for buildings, the determination of the curriculum, and normal decisions about everyday running of the schools” (159). When examining the formal education of our current educational institutions, it is evident that the power structure lies with superintendents, school boards and principals who share expectations on how classrooms should be run as well as decision making for the betterment of the institution and students. Overall, formal education has evolved and will continue to evolve as educators search for their perception of the “one best system” for their students. Throughout the history of education, power structure and social class matters have influenced how educators implement regulations, interact with community members and fellow educators, but most importantly, the education of students so that they may be instilled with the skills and confidence to further themselves as

Today I will be comparing and contrasting two religions: Hinduism and Sikhism. The three subtopics I will be comparing and contrasting between these two religions are their, practices, rituals, and symbolisms, also their sacred writings, and major tenets and codes of behaviors. My first subtopic will be about Hinduism’s and Sikhism’s practices, rituals, and symbolisms. One similarity between the two religions is that Hindus and Sikhs carry out rituals within the presence of an holy item such as a holy scripture or idol of a god or goddess. However in contrast Sikhs don't care about rituals as much as Hindus do, because they believe in equality and purity as the path to god and they never use anything such as idols or paintings of gods because

The last principle of illegality is infringement of convention rights that the Human Rights Act 1998 stated ‘it is unlawful for a public authority