A women’s right to personally decide what she wants done to her body in any medical situation has been something they have fought for many years. On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court set a precedent that gave women that right. Along with this right to decide came the legalization of medical abortions. This is a subject that affects all American citizens nowadays, both men and women, because of the recent protests such as the Women’s March on Washington. As citizens of the United States, men and women alike, we know the historical past of what women have fought for and what rights they have been given due to that fight. If Roe v. Wade, the case that gave women the right to make their own personal medical decisions, were overturned, what …show more content…
Wade has been beneficial to our nation in more ways than one. According to plannedparenthood.org, “The ability to make this personal healthcare decision has also enabled women to pursue educational and employment opportunities that were often unthinkable prior to Roe.” This statement is exactly why this famous case should not be overturned. Sarah Weddington, the youngest woman that was on the Roe v. Wade case, said in an interview with The Guardian that although states do not have the capability to make abortions illegal, they do have the ability to make access to them near to impossible. eddington also mentioned that there is a vacancy in the Supreme Court and with all of the older male judges, if a few pro-life judges were to be elected in, our right to abortion could be at stake. (qtd. in …show more content…
Wade were to be overturned because pro-life judges were elected in, there is proof to believe that women would begin self-inducing abortions and the mortality rates would rise. Proof of this comes from an article from November 2015 in The Atlantic. Olga Khazan writes that since the 2013 law in Texas was passed stating that “the states abortion clinics [must] meet the standards of ambulatory surgical centers and [that] their doctors [must] have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital,” 100,000 and 240,000 women in Texas (ages 18-49) have attempted to self-induce an abortion. You do not need to be a medical doctor or medically trained to know that a self-induced abortion is extremely harmful to both the woman and the fetus. There are several ways a woman could self-induce an abortion: herbals, street corner drugs, and self-induced. Herbal abortions could cause problems because chemicals in a plant can vary from year to year which would in turn bring about the problem of ineffective amounts of overdosing. (abortionclinics.org) Street corner drugs, despite just sounding dangerous, can actually cause more problems than one might think. Although people have gotten lucky and received the correct drug and directions, this is extremely rare. Abortionsclinic.org says that, “[t]he most frequent problem is that the drugs you find are phony, look-a-like tablets, imported from a foreign country and do not contain any medication that would cause an abortion. Sometimes these
A Women’s Right To Make Her Own Healthcare Decisions I am a strong pro-choice Democrat who believes that women must have the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions. The landmark decision of Roe v. Wade ensured that women have the right to decide what happens to their bodies free from governmental legislation. The right for a woman to an abortion is a personal decision that should only be made by the woman through consultation with her friends, family, and medical professionals. Sadly, numerous legislators disagree with this view and continually attempt to limit a woman’s right to choose.
CASE BRIEF Student's name : Elise Piallo and Sarah Rahmani • Case name : Roe v. Wade (Full name : Jane Roe, et al. v. Henry Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County) • Citation : 410.US.113 (1973) • Fact of the case : Appellant Jane Roe (Norma McCorvey) was a pregnant woman who wanted to obtain an abortion.
Before Roe filed a law suit challenging the Texas laws, all states had very authoritative laws that only allowed women (mostly) to have an abortion if the doctor believed they were endangered. During the trials the constitution, of course, was brought to the courts attention, to be specific the 9th and 14th amendments. The 9th amendment guarantees that the government would not infringe our natural rights, like freedom of speech, of religion, and self defense, etc. This also includes the right to bear children, the right to privacy, the right to pursue any occupation one desires, and the right to seek any medical treatment of ones choosing. The 14th amendment addresses many aspects such as citizenship, due process, privileges & immunities,
The Supreme Court case struck down the Massachusetts law that claimed that only married couples could obtain contraceptives that registered doctors or pharmacists provided. The Court stated that the law did not satisfy the rational basis test offered by the 14th Amendment. Perhaps one of the most widely known and controversial Supreme Court cases regarding contraceptives, Roe v. Wade still gains attention in legal debates today. The Supreme Court stated that by banning a woman’s right to an abortion, Texas violated her constitutional rights. Women hold the right to an abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy under their 14th Amendment rights.
To add, when Roe V Wade was overturned I saw a lot of people (women) posting about self abortions. Just seeing this, it has rendered many women now having self-abortions as an option. According to Rainn “Every 68 seconds another American is sexually assaulted.” and “1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime (14.8% completed, 2.8% attempted)” These statistics can convey that statistically one or more of
The purpose of the case is a value to my investigation as its verdict resulted in paramount reproductive independencies, demonstrating the Court’s authority over human freedoms, paired with progressiveness towards individual liberties. The content of the case is a value to my investigation as it includes several provisions expanding women’s rights, including the need for privacy, removal of limitations on the frequency of abortions and the attempts to save fetuses, demonstrating the severe lack of rights in 1985, necessitating revisions. The contents of this case is a limitation as it discusses the involvement of states and physicians to halt abortions, subsequently not focusing on actual limitations of reproductive rights, including cases in which abortion was illegal. This fails to demonstrate the full scope of restrictions on women’s rights
The Supreme court came to a decision that they would keep the law active. Like many, I do not support the legalization of abortions. I believe that ALL lives are precious, and no life should be terminated, simply because they are an inconvenience to the mother. Dealing with going through an abortion because of medical purposes and victims of rape, is a different story. But when a woman thinks her life is more precious, and is too selfish to give the HUMAN growing inside of her, depending on her to nourish it, then that is a feminist issue, I cannot stand behind.
From 1848 to 1920, an outrageous span of 70 years, women fought for equal rights, to have their voices and opinions heard. Little by little women have gained rights they have so passionately fought for. In 1973, about 50 years after women became eligible to vote, and began to be taken more seriously, the case of Roe v Wade granted women to have one of the most impactful rights to date, to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Now, it is safe to say that all women and perhaps most men would not want women to lose the rights they have today, especially because there have been many influential women around the world who have been given the chance to be impactful because of the rights they possess. So, if we do not want to take away women’s rights and
Roe v. Wade not only set the ball rolling, but in reality reformed tough laws on a woman’s rights to have a safe abortion. As stated by CNN, abortion has been morphed into something more attainable to women who need it across the board, “The court held that a woman’s right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy (recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut) protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision gave a woman a right to abortion during the entirety of the
The District Court decided that Jane Roe had standing to undertake this argument and that she presented a justifiable controversy. On January 22, 1973 the US Supreme Court announced its decision in Roe v. Wade, in a 7-2 vote, challenging the Texas statute that made it a crime to perform an abortion unless the woman 's life is at stake. Texas law recognized for the first time that the constitutional right to privacy is broad enough to encompass a woman 's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy. Roe v. Wade made all state laws outlawing abortion unconstitutional, except to save a woman 's life or in cases of rape, incest or fetal abnormality. This made abortion services much safer and much more accessible throughout the country.
The Right to Abortion On January 22, 1973, in a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down it’s landmark decision in the case of Roe v. Wade, which recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians (Planned Parenthood). There are many moments in history when Roe v. Wade has been so close to being overturned, yet it is still in place. Abortion should stay legal, or not overturned, for the health of women everywhere. First, this important case took place at the time of abortion being illegal in most states, including Texas, where Roe v. Wade began.
As a woman, I believe that my rights should not be determined by some man in Washington DC. Instead, everyone should be entitled to their own opinion. Abortions and contraceptives are not procedures or medications that women usually advertise and frankly, it is none of government’s business what women choose to do with their own bodies. They are not the property of men or the
Wade is a case concerning the woman’s right to have an abortion. Roe was a fake name given to a woman named Norma McCorvey in order to protect her identity. Norma McCorvey was a Texas resident who sought to terminate her pregnancy by having an abortion. At the time Texas law prohibited any abortion unless the abortion was going to save the mother’s life. The proposed question for this case was whether or not the constitution embraced a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion.
Before Roe v. wade the number of deaths from illegal abortions was around 5000 and in the 50s and 60s the number of illegal abortions ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year. These illegal abortions pose major health risks to the life of the woman including damage to the bladder, intestines as well as rupturing of the uterus. The choice to become a mother must be given to the woman most importantly because it’s her body, her health, and she will be taking on a great responsibility. A woman’s choice to choose abortion should not be restricted by anyone; there are multiple reasons why abortion will be the more sensible decision for the female.
People have the right of choice. The ability to make a choice is something that is a right of every American. To be able to have the choice of whether or not to have an abortion should not be dictated by higher authority. American women have the right to choose and should be able to control their bodies and the decision that affects their lives. When the leaders of America begin to agree on the ideals of it’s citizens, society becomes much more stable and that the the American culture benefitted from the Roe v Wade Decision.