The Benefits Of Uber And Drunk Driving

Associations like MADD speak about how the higher MLDA has made the roads safer, but they refuse to admit that it is not the only reason. Before the raising of the MLDA there was a statistic recorded, “Rate of accident and fatalities in the 1980’s decreased less than that of European countries whose legal drinking ages are lower than 21,”( “Drinking Age”). Previously, before the MLDA was raised, traffic incidents relating to alcohol were very scarce; America was a safe place to drive. One factor often forgotten is that, some people are irresponsible and develop bad habits. Therefore someone will always fail to abide by the rules.

“Drunk Driving” is an article written by Bonnie Steinbeck. Within her article, she analyses a wide variety of court rulings and legal precedent to defend the idea that if a person kills another person while drunk driving, that they ought to be charged with murder. Throughout her article, Dr. Steinbock analyses three major concepts in her argument. The first concept, that drunk driving constitutes malice, is one of the core facts needed to be considered murder. Second, she explores how intoxication can affect both liability and culpability within the legal system.

“There’s No Benefit to Lowering the Drinking Age” explains, on average about eleven teens die daily as a result of drunk driving (Voas 464). When teens throw a party, alcohol is usually involved. Then once the party is over the kids have to get home somehow and they often drive themselves. When an alcoholic drink is placed in an eighteen-year-old hand decisions are made that harm them and others

Brad continues on with the study about why someone will get into a car with a drunk driver, what the person’s motives for doing so, and the impact on the drunk driver. The person wants to make a positive impact; in addition, that person wants to give that person advice to the drunk driver to protect people and themselves in the car by controlling their alcohol intake or limiting their alcohol intake altogether. If that person supports that person drinking then that will make the person who is drinking want to limit their alcohol consumption so that they can save lives and protect people. I personally feel that if that person gives people advice on how to control their alcohol intake while driving that will be beneficial not only to the person driving but to the rest of the community; in addition, giving teenagers and adults advice would spread awareness that will persuade the person drinking to

To many people who have not had a personal encounter with drunk drivers, the issue may not hit as hard as people who have had an encounter. Drinking and driving occurs way too frequently and without proper legislations regulating the issue, the general public suffers from the consequences of one’s negligent and selfish act: to drink and drive. The .08 Per Se Law raises a number of questions and arguments, particularly focusing on its effectiveness and purposes. Questions and arguments include whether the policy criminalizes the act of social drinking, whether the policy targets the real problem, the effects the policy has on the criminal justice system and the economy, and lastly, whether the policy saves lives. In conclusion, the policy

Road rage, ignoring traffic laws, drinking and driving, or texting and driving are becoming a convention. As more people convert to these unacceptable actions, the roads become even more perilous. Reevaluating the way individuals drive could end up saving someone’s

The people of this program want to change for the best and do not want to go to lose their licenses, possibly go to jail and face fines from the state. “Colleagues found that States using 24/7 sobriety experienced not only a 12% drop in repeat drunk driving offenders but also a 9% drop in domestic-violence arrests.” (Humphreys, 2015, para. 6). The program makes for a better community and for better citizens in the

In this century, people don't care to wonder how the penalties for drunk driving came about. Before 1980, the public believed drunk driving fatalities could be excused; that it wasn't considered murder. More than twenty-one thousand people died each year during drunk driving crashes due to the public's view and United States law. That changed once awareness raised about this issue, and the public’s attitude towards drinking changed. Now, in the United States, that number cut in half thanks to Candy Lightner.

This documentation is beneficial to our source because it shows the severity of the consequences of drinking irresponsibly. It provides numerous police data that gives information on aspects affiliated with police indication of involvement with alcohol of injured drivers. With this information, we can depict the seriousness of drinking. The source also provides numerous statistics that will definitely get people’s attention, such as, “Police recognize and document alcohol involvement in 72 percent of injured drivers

However, “90% of drunk driving deaths in the United States were found in the over 21 age group” (Gruenewald). For this reason, drunk driving is not directly correlated with the drinking age. In addition, the percent of drunk driving deaths in the United States has reduced at a slower rate than European countries where they have their legal drinking age at eighteen. This suggest that if lowering the drinking age was a success in Europe, it may also be effective here in the United States to diminish the amount of drunk driving deaths. This is because people that become injured due to alcohol or alcohol poisoning are afraid to report their injuries to the hospital or authorities out of fear of illegal consequences for underage drinking.

Americans know the dangers of getting behind the wheel while intoxicated. When alcohol enters the human body it impairs your judgement. Your speech begins to slur, the overall control you have on your body vanish because your balance and flow are altered by the alcohol entering your bloodstream. But yet the court systems lets them off with a simple slap on the wrist , like a mother to a child. What happens when that “first time offender” , loses their sense of knowledge of how to drive a car.

Drunk driving is a serious problem that continues to take thousands of deaths each year. Too many innocent lives been lost to drunk driving. A death from drunk driving does not only affect the victim but it affects everyone around them such as family and friends. One night, one drink, one mistake is all it takes for drunk driving to take its toll. There are many solutions to prevent drunk driving, but they will only work if we put them into play.

Rockwell thinks that drunk driving should be legalized. The author thinks this because he believes that drunk drivers are being charged for the wrong things. Rockwell thinks that they are focusing too much on drunk drivers drinking alcohol, when they should be focusing on what crime was committed. What Rockwell means by that is he would rather drunk drivers get charged for man slaughter or reckless driving. Instead police enforcement is more focused on the substance they had in their body.

An end to drunk driving When driving a vehicle, thinking about the effects it will have on others might be the last thing on a person 's mind. Getting into an accident can be horrific, especially if the cause is drunk driving. Drunk drivers put lives at risk, as they can swerve uncontrollably and crash into innocent bystanders or other drivers. Automobile accidents occur daily, whether it is from a distracted driver, drunk driver or a sudden crash. However, drunk driving accidents and deaths related to them are totally preventable.

The situation of the Uber drivers is under confusion. It is easy for the company to tell the drivers that this will be the future, but the occupation and the life of the Uber drivers’ matters a lot. Peak demand