There are two versions of The Legend of Sleepy Hallow that we viewed in class. We read the short story and we watched the 1949 Disney animated movie. I think that both of these would be a good way to inform new readers about The Legend of Sleepy Hallow but I think that the short story is a better choice to inform new readers about this topic. I think that the short story shows and gives more details, it gives you a better visual about what is happening because it uses more describing words, and lastly the short story is more suspenseful, making the reader to want to continue the story. The short story is better than the movie in my opinion because it gives the reader more details about what is happening in the story than it did in the movie. For example, the short story explains to the reader that Tarrytown is a quiet place that can lull the residents to sleep. Also, it describes the residents as believing in and seeing visions and voices in the air throughout Tarrytown. Contrary to the short story, the movie edition does none of these things. …show more content…
I think that visuals help people understand things better because when they read descriptive words they immeditaly conjure mental images. For example the part when it is talking about the teacher it says ,“The teachers mouth watered as, in his mind’s eye, he saw future meals.” This example can easily be visuald because when it says that, the reader can picture in their mind someone’s mouth being filled with saliva because they’re so hungry. Also, as a reader, this makes the character relatable. Most people have been so hungry that their mouth
I think that the movie was better than the story. The movie explained it a lot more and there were also difference between the book and the movie. In the movie Mrs. Riviera leaves on the train with the sheriff's wife and in the book Ms. Rivera was not a character. Mrs Rivera dated Frank Miller who was the bad guy and also dated the sherif.
Jon Krakauer's book, Into the Wild, is a continuation of his article which appeared in the magazine, "Outside. " It follows the life of Chris McCandless, a charismatic twenty-something-year-old, who decides to leave his comfortable suburban lifestyle to travel across the country straight out of college and eventually live a life off of the Alaskan backcountry. Driven by his idealist views, he breaks ties with his family and embraces the natural world surrounding him. However, his acts lead to his demise and consequently cause varied opinions about the adventurer. While some sympathized with McCandless, others castigated him for his selfishness and foolishness.
I believe that the movie version of Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird follows the book very well. Compared to the amount of similarities, the differences are almost negligible. When reading To Kill a Mockingbird, one can be fascinated by the differences and similarities between the movie and the book in the portrayal of characters, the layout of Maycomb, and the character outcomes. For me, the characters were just as I imagined them.
Additionally, the differences and similarities are also about in the characters. Obviously, Walter Mitty is the main character in both the movie and short story. The short story has him seeming to be much older than he is in the movie. Walter was taken throughout different daydreams in the motion picture and story. He was going through a normal day , in the short story and movie , and experienced things like being in front of a firing squad , pretending to be Sean O'Connell and talking to Cheryl , being an expert surge working on VIPs , and etc.
Tyler Mcilwain Reading response 2/15 "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" In this piece, Irving's sarcasm is quite present throughout the story. He uses Ichabod's character to signify greed. Even though he seems to be lacking aesthetically, he wants it all and is willing to do anything to get it. Katrina is also quite greedy when it comes to winning over her male counterparts.
The way people change and create new characters can effect entire storylines and plots. Sometimes people change important characters for more views, audience members, or readers. For example, in Washington Irving’s book “Sleepy Hollow” and Tim Burton’s movie “Sleepy Hollow” the main character was a completely different person. While the movie and book version of Sleepy Hollow have the same story line, the two main characters couldn’t be anymore different.
We’ve all read a really good book and then watched the movie and thought, what the heck this wasn’t like the book at all. That’s exactly how it was for the movie Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children. Although they were both very good the book Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children was better than the movie. When Jacob is at work he gets a phone call from his grandpa, Abe, he’s looking for the key to his gun cabinet that Jacob has hidden so his grandpa doesn’t hurt himself or anyone else. Once Jacob arrives at his grandpa’s house he discovers his grandpa isn’t home and all the doors and windows are open.
The story was more powerful than the movie because of its dialogue, setting, and plot. Following that, The story was better than the movie because of its dialogue. For example, “But Mrs Whatsit came to her and
“Sleepy Hollow” is a 1999 Tim Burton film that’s based off of the Washington Irving novel “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”. Tim Burton decided on loosely basing his film on the story instead of doing a direct adaptation. Some of these changes significantly worsen the story, and devoids it of its original meaning. Changes like making Ichabod Crane a constable instead of a schoolmaster makes the story worse. The differences from the original source material, makes the film more unenjoyable, however besides the source material changes it delivers an action packed intriguing mystery.
Imagery allows a reader to imagine the events of a story within their mind through mental images. Imagery can describe how something looks, a sound, a feeling, a taste, or a smell. Imagery is especially important when the author is describing a character or a setting. The short story The Man In The Black Suit by Stephen King has several excellent examples of imagery.
I would recommend this movie to someone who read the poem but only to show them how the movie ruined a good story. After watching the movie my final reactions are the movie is way off from the poem, but if it wasn't based off of the poem "Beowulf" then I think it would be a great
Metro Goldwyn Mayer's (MGM) The Wizard of Oz is a 1939 musical film. It's an adaptation of L. Frank Baum's classic children's book, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. It was MGM's most costly production at the time, with a budget of 2.8 million. It was nominated for six Academy Awards, including Best Picture.
This was kept the same in both versions to keep the audience wondering about what happened to Ichabod Crane. Those were only some of the similarities between the film and drama versions of “Sleepy Hollow” there are many
No matter how hard directors and screenwriters try, it is impossible for any movie to be a perfect reflection of the detailed plot and intricate characters presented in a novel. I had watched the film adaption of Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend prior to reading the book, I was very aware of major differences from the get go. The to main categories that I could see differences being placed in were emotion and action. Many aspects of the book were changed to emphasize both either emotion or action for the film. Considering pieces of literature cannot be easily transferred to the screen, few of these changes were very necessary.
The 21st century version of Sleepy Hollow is different from the short story version in numerous ways. One major and obvious difference is that it is placed in the 21st century. Besides the obvious difference of things that the story now has like cars, Starbucks, phones, automatic weapons, and other devices we have now, it takes away most of the characters and their storylines from the short story. Katrina has a role, but she in this version is a witch and no longer alive. Brom’s character wasn’t even mentioned in the first episode, and his character was a very large part of the short story.