The Case of Leighton Hay
Leighton Hay was a 19-year-old Jamaican-born Canadian citizen who was wrongfully convicted of first-degree murder in 2002. This started with an altercation that broke out at midnight when four men and a woman tried to enter a nightclub without paying a cover charge. Later, those intruders left but three men with handguns came into the club and two of them made it into the kitchen where they shot Colin Moore eight times who was the brother of the person who was organizing the event that was taking place that evening (Roger Moore). In the kitchen, there were two more people aside from the brothers, Colin’s wife (Jennifer Moore) and a friend (Leisa Maillard). Jennifer ended up identifying one of the shooters as Gary Eunick.
…show more content…
The license plates of the cars that the gunman used to escape belonged to Lydia Hay, Leighton’s mother. When police arrested Hay he did not have the dreadlocks so upon searching the home police found short hairs wrapped in a newspaper in the garbage. Hay stated that he had shaved his face two days prior but the police were convinced that he had come home and shaved his head in order to disguise his appearance. He was then arrested. In 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada approved the order seeking further scientific testing of the hair found in his home. Microscopic examination showed that the hairs were facial hairs, not head hairs thus making the prosecution theory that Leighton had shaved his head to disguise his appearance unsustainable. Hay spent around 12 and a half years in prison before his release in 2013. The case against him relied on unreliable witness testimony and flawed forensic evidence. Hay's wrongful conviction had a significant impact on his life, and he later received a settlement from the government of Ontario for …show more content…
She was shown photographs which included Hay’s photograph (taken 18 months earlier) and she selected him as an 80% likeness. Three weeks later, she was shown a sequence of photographs which included one of Hay (taken hours after the murder) and she did not select any photograph. At a second identification process, Maillard didn’t select any photographs and, when shown the photograph of Hay she stated that he looked very different and that in his arrest photo, he did not have a gaunt face like that of the second gunman at the club. An article by Pezdek, Abed & Cormia (2021) explores the relationship between stress and eyewitness memory accuracy, as well as the relationship between stress and eyewitness confidence. They found that stress impairs the accuracy of eyewitness memory but not the confidence-accuracy relationship. This means that individuals under stress may recall events less accurately, but still have high confidence in their recollections. This is evident with eyewitness Maillard as she was present during the shooting, which means it is plausible that she may have experienced trauma and even stress during the investigations as she had to live through the traumatic experience again, especially when telling officers her experience. This might have played a role in her judgement and accuracy of recalling what happened that night, but she was also quite confident that it
Herbert Landry was then sentenced to five years to life in prison based on evidence that a dog retrieved. Eventually, Landry was exonerated after several appeals. Thanks to Landry’s attorney, a petition was created that emphasized how poor the evidence was. Unfortunately, the petition was dismissed.
(Frederick, 2009). During the trial, Mr. Wilkins never called a witness to testify on Virginia’s behalf, and he countered allegations with only one day of defense. He neglected to challenge any of Heidle’s or Palmieri’s claims which reportedly provided key points of the state’s case. Heidle, who was a good friend of Jason’s, worked for him performing household tasks. Palmieri had worked in the dental office of Dr. Larzelere.
In February 2014, Steven Farmer was convicted of sexual assault, and various other charges. The charges stemmed from his actions while working at Centennial Hills Hospital in 2008. He was accused of sexually assaulting two patients. He was found guilty of the sexual assault of those two women, as well as indecent exposure and open and gross lewdness for his behavior with three other patients. He was sentenced to 30 years to life, and is currently serving his sentence at Ely State Prison.
Let's explore another case, where we have Ryan Ferguson, from Jefferson City, Missouri. Ferguson is accused of killing a popular sports editor, Kent Heitholt, from Columbia Daily Tribune, on Halloween night in 2001. Ferguson has been in prison now for eight years. The accuser is Charles Erickson, who claims that he and Ferguson agreed to rob someone for money to help them buy more alcohol. Erickson went in to the police station two years after the murder and gave the police suspicion that he knew some of what happened the night Heitholt was killed.
For over 70 years the homes off of Woodlawn Avenue have been known as Hathorn Court. However, the community came together on Saturday to change the name to Woodlawn Court. "Hathorn Court has always had a stigma about it because of the crime rate that was here. We had a problem bringing it back to where it needs to be," said Property Manager, Don Paul. On Saturday, the community held a block party and clean up day.
When defense attorneys sought relief because this withheld evidence supported earlier claims about the unreliability of eyewitness testimony, the prosecution claimed that a mistake had been made and that no photo lineup existed. Defense attorneys had also pursued DNA and fingerprint testing of items at the crime scene, citing a recent Arizona law expanding access to testing in old cases. All requests for testing were denied. At Hooper’s clemency hearing, defense attorneys continued to focus on his innocence claim: presenting testimony about unreliable eyewitness testimony, the misconduct throughout his case, and the absence of any physical evidence linking him to the crime. Hooper’s advanced age (76) and his lack of disciplinary issues while in prison were also
Gerard Baden-Clay appeared in the Brisbane Magistrates Court charged with murder about two months after reporting his wife, Allison Baden-Clay missing on April 20, 2012. His conviction was downgraded in December 2015 to manslaughter on the point that the jury’s decision could not be supported by the evidence presented at trial. Although manslaughter itself is a serious charge and the sentence of imprisonment is an extremely serious penalty, there are many public backlash and disturbance as a result of this. *Adding more
All throughout that time, he had consistently maintained innocence. He never once admitted to being guilty. In the Serial podcast Sarah Koenig mentions “Despite being in prison for so long, he still sticks with his story and has remained consistently innocent.” (ep 10) . When arrested, commonly people admit to crimes they haven’t committed
Mr. Hale said he was going to contact the coroner, and Minnie did not respond. He stated under oath that, “she looked queer” (pp. L-39) Mr. Hale found this odd and so did Mr. Henderson. For this reason, they suspect my client of murder. However, according to expert Caroll Douglas, “Recent research shows that blunted cardiovascular and cortisol reactions to acute psychological stress are associated with adverse behavioral outcomes.”
There are many early legal systems although one that should have played a role in this verdict was mosaic law. Mosaic law is one of the greatest influences on Canadian law and it is fixated in the bible and can also be known as the ten commandments. One of the mosaic laws that relates to this case is, “Thou shalt not kill”. Under the mosaic law, it was forbidden to commit murder and those who did would receive a punishment. The Sammy Yatim case should be the same and the charges should follow the mosaic law.
Effects of post identification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 334–346. Lindsay, R., & Wells, G. (1985). Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556–564.
14. Tomlin, Charles • Date of Conviction: 1979 • Date of Exoneration: 1994 • Summary of the Case: On the night of 12/7/1978, Daniel Stewart, a 25-year-old drug dealer was fatally shot and robbed of nine pounds of marijuana worth $5,000 in an alley in Bakersfield, California. Stewart’s girlfriend, Leticia Mendez, 24, was sitting next to Stewart when he was shot in the face. Mendez told Bakersfield police that the gunman was a stocky black man, about 5 feet, 6 inches to 5 feet, 8 inches tall with a mustache and a medium Afro hairdo. At first she said the gunman was a hitchhiker.
A. THERE WAS INTENTIONAL INJURY, WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THE HARM WOULD OCCUR IN THE FORUM STATE: In Calder v. Jones 465 U.S. 783 (1984)Shirley Jones, the defendant, is a professional entertainer based in California, who brought suit in California Superior Court, claiming that she had been defamed in an article written and edited by Iain Calder and John South, the petitioners who lived in Florida. The article was published in a national magazine having its largest circulation in California. Petitioners, both residents of Florida, were served with process by mail in Florida, and, on special appearances, moved to dismiss the case for the lack of personal jurisdiction.
This week’s topic was very interesting to learn about how important eyewitnesses can be when a crime and accidents do occur. In the case that was presented in the 60-minute segment of Ronald Cotton and Jennifer Thompson is exactly how legal system can fail us when it comes to the eyewitnesses’ identification testimony and how a person’s perception and memory can be altered. The aspect of psychology and law research from this week’s course material is most relevant to the topic of perception and memory. The memory has different stages the first is encoding the process of entering perception into memory.
During the fall of 1993, Shirley Crook’s, a loving mother and wife, life was horribly cut short in one of the most horrific ways possible, drowning. Seventeen year old, Christopher Simmons, wrapped his victim in duct tape and electrical cords and drowned her in a river with help from his accomplices John Tessmer and Christopher Benjamin. He attempted to burglarize the Crooks residence along with his accomplices, and he only murdered Mrs. Crooks because ‘the bitch seen my face’ (State v. Simmons). He “assured his friends that their status as juveniles would allow them to ‘get away with it.’... Brian Moomey, a 29-year-old convicted felon who allowed neighborhood teens to "hang out" at his home.