The Perils Of Indifference Speech Analysis

Elie Wiesel’s “The Perils of Indifference” uses pathos, loaded words, and rhetorical questions to persuade his audience that one must act when they see injustice, suffering, or unfair treatment. The use of pathos in “The Perils of Indifference” persuades the audience that one must act when they see injustice. “He was finally free, but there

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

“In a way, to be indifferent to that suffering is what makes the human being inhuman. Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred.” In a way, indifference is the greatest danger one may come across. The thoughts of helplessness and feeling exiled is enough to drive a normal person completely off the rails. So Wiesel's statement is first hand proof yet again that indifference is more than just someone not providing the care you need: it's enough to make someone completely give up on life and lose all hope they may have

Holocaust survivor and Nobel Laureate, Elie Wiesel delivered an impassioned speech in which he spoke of the perils of indifference in front of United States and World leaders. During his speech, which as known as the “Perils of Indifference.” Wiesel uses a three pronged approach of pathos, logos, and ethos to demonstrate the dangers standing by and doing nothing. Speaking as a witness, survivor, and teacher, Wiesel successfully argues for the case of action in Kosovo by first making witnesses of the audience, then by questioning the audience’s ethics, and finally showing that the world has learned from the atrocities of the past. First Wiesel uses pathos by telling his story of liberation in a third person narrative, drawing his audience in.

Through such acts of altruism, Wiesel affirms that humanity is the consideration of others' welfare, as he was resistant and opposed violence especially targeted towards his father to the detriment of his only luxury within the concentration camp. Thus, Wiesel affirms that the preservation of one’s sense of hope and the consideration of other individuals can be a form of defiance against

Wiesel emphasizes the problem of apathy using pathos and ethos to make his case. Elie Wiesel achieves this in a number of ways by putting the audience and himself on an equal footing, and because of his earlier success, he has credibility even before he starts talking about the idea of indifference. Elie Wiesel urges his audience to take action to fight the indifference in society and between nations. This speech attempts to educate listeners on the speaker's viewpoint on indifference and how societies respond to disasters.audience in his shoes and the shoes of others who have suffered as a result of indifference. Elie Wiesel's life has been marred by tragedy.

James Boyce Ms.Whitt Stem Sophomore Honors English 24 May 2023 Choosing Not to be Indifferent With great injustice comes greater indifference. The speech given by Elie Wiesel called “The Perils of Indifference” touches on the Indifference of certain governments during the holocaust. He himself suffered greatly from this indifference of international powers as he was one of the people found in a concentration camp at the end of the war. Indifference suffered him to this injustice, so it must be bad.

Wiesel informed people of what happened in the holocaust, yet his true purpose was to persuade and inspire change in the mindsets of powerful people. The speech was given in front of the president, his staff, and members of Congress. His purpose was to stop indifference when it comes to injustice, whether or not it is in America. “Indifference elicits no response. Indifference is not a response.

Indifference need to be gain awareness and be stopped. He develops his claim by narrating the dangers of indifference, and how it affected his life then, describes how wrongful it is to be treated in such a way. Finally Wiesel illustrates examples of how indifference affected the world. Wiesel’s purpose is to inform us about the dangers of indifference in order to bring change about it. He establishes a straightforward tone for the president, ambassadors, politicians, and congressmen.

In the speech, titled “The Perils of Indifference,” Elie Wiesel showed gratitude to the American people, President Clinton, and Mrs. Hillary Clinton for the help they brought and apprised the audience about the violent consequences and human suffering due to indifference against humanity (Wiesel). This speech was persuasive. It was also effective because it conveyed to the audience the understanding of

Wiesel’s speech shows how he worked to keep the memory of those people alive because he knows that people will continue to be guilty, to be accomplices if they forget. Furthermore, Wiesel knows that keeping the memory of those poor, innocent will avoid the repetition of the atrocity done in the future. The stories and experiences of Wiesel allowed for people to see the true horrors of what occurs when people who keep silence become “accomplices” of those who inflict pain towards humans. To conclude, Wiesel chose to use parallelism in his speech to emphasize the fault people had for keeping silence and allowing the torture of innocent

In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.

In seeing human beings as less than human beings, individuals were able to treat one another with a lack of dignity and voice. Wiesel 's work reminds us that anytime voice is silenced, dehumanization is the result. This becomes its own end that must be stopped at all

In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, Elie Wiesel asserts the following: "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.". What Wiesel is saying, is that if we do not help the ones who are being killed, hurt, or mistreated. They will continue to cause pain too those people and will not stop. Unless us as people come to stand up against the evil.

Staying silent about global injustice issues does not benefit anyone. One cannot expect to make a difference in the world by simply stating their opinion and continuing their day-to-day schedule. Although it is crucial to exhibit one’s feelings, one cannot change the world by making statements or posing threats against the tormentors. Humanity needs to feel the agonizing pain of every person’s death, no matter which ethnicity, social, or religious group they belong to. A Christian must stand up for a Muslim.