The Pros And Cons Of Assisted Suicide

By allowing the option of physician assisted suicide, the state may be softening the idea that there is no hope for someone that ill, and that sends the wrong message to the public. Just as well, the Death With Dignity legislation may compromise the view that people have on doctors as healers (Plaisted 205). Patients may lose trust in them if they condoned, or even participated in physician assisted suicide. Those who are against PAS feel that there should not be a loss of hope for someone suffering from an incurable disease, and are against my argument

Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia has been one of the most debated subjects in the past years. There are resilient advocates on both sides of the debate for and against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Advocates of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide believe it is a person ’s right to die when faced with terminal illness rather than suffer through to an unpleasant demise. Whereas, opponents contend that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is not only equivalent of murder, but it is ethically and morally incorrect.

Should Physician-Assisted Suicide be Encouraged? For several years, physicians and patients have argued that a legal form of suicide should be legalized. Many of the patients who support this idea are in critical condition and for many of the physicians, this is their last resort. While some support this idea, others argue that this is not a logical stance to take. The concept that has swept and divided the nation is perceived as “Assisted Suicide”.

Life is never guaranteed and whether it is through an illness or an accident, we as humans are eventually going to die. Physicians Assisted suicide is one of the most controversial issues. The issue of doctor-assisted suicide has been the subject of the heated dispute in recent years. While some oppose the idea that a physician should aid in ending a life, others believe that physicians should be permitted in helping a patient to end his or her unbearable suffering when faced with a terminal illness. Furthermore, Physician-assisted suicide should be legal; it should be the patient’s right to decide when and how he or she should die.

Death is an option for those who are suffering and do not see life as it is anymore. They are slowly fading, and want to willingly be gone. Several see it as inhumane and religiously wrong, but need to consider the patients feeling and what they want. . Due to these reasons, assisted suicide should be considered legal. We are promised rights in the US, and the right to die should be one that is given without any question.

Since Oregon legalized physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill in 1997, euthanasia has been receiving close attention. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, euthanasia is the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering. Many states in the U.S have been debating the pros and cons of euthanasia with hopes of legalizing it or having it remain illegal. Advocates for assisted suicide believe those who are mentally competent and suffering from a terminal illness, with no chance of long-term survival, should have the right the end their suffering. They argue if people here legally able to refuse medical treatment they should also have the freedom the end their lives in a quick,

 Assisted dying is viewed to directly contribute to good quality of death as “by respecting the person’s wishes, alleviating potential suffering and preserving dignity” individuals can ensure that they experience the best possible

Proponents of assisted suicide agree that patients faced with an inevitable death deserve the right to end their lives on their own term, free of pain and suffering. The two arguments for and

As a result, to keep a terminally ill patient for several months is exceptionally expensive. Therefore, this economic burden will effect the loved ones of patients, leaving patients not only depressed about the condition of their life, but ashamed and guilty about the economic hardship that they are putting their loves ones through. Thus, physician assisted suicide can save people’s money by not forcing someone who doesn't want to be alive, live. Moreover, assisted suicide helps to lower the health care costs for the future generations. If health care cuts the medical treatments for terminally ill patients, younger people will be able to have health insurance and take care of themselves before it’s too late.

Would you want to live the rest of your life in extreme physical pain? The discussion of Assisted Suicide has sparked controversy around the world for decades. Assisted Suicide is when nurses end a patient’s life when they are suffering greatly from a mental or physical illness. Assisted Suicide has a dark history regarding who they killed and for what reason, and that needs to change with regulations. I believe that Assisted Suicide should remain in practice for those who are in constant physical pain due to chronic illnesses and diseases.

Most of these statements come from religious persons or the physicians themselves. They claim that not only is it morally unjust but it is considered murder, “Today, nearly all states prohibit assisted suicide and euthanasia. In Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio, assisting suicide is considered murder.” (Raed Gonzalez, J.D., LL.M candidate) For religious people assisted suicide goes against the laws of God.

After researching both sides of the argument, it is clear that the benefits of physician-assisted suicide outweigh the disadvantages. The benefits of ending a patient’s pain and suffering, minimizing the emotional and financial effects on families, and preserving the right for patients to decide their own fate, supports the legalization of physician-assisted suicide.

Another valid argument in favor of assisted suicide is the fact that while assisting a person in committing suicide is illegal, providing them with information on how to commit suicide is not (Flanders 41). Many books have been written (one by Jack Kevorkian) on the subject of suicide methodology. And know with the increasing popularity of the internet, methods on how to commit suicide is readily available to anyone with a modem. The argument is that if a person can be told how to commit suicide, then why can 't that same be person be aided in committing suicide. A wise man once said "Knowledge is power."

As humans we feel obligated to support their individual choices. Every person has the right to choose freely what they will do with their lives as long as they inflict no harm on others. Many argue that assisted suicide is inflicting harm on themselves which is seen as being a harm to society. The people who ask for this

Patients have the right to the kind of treatment they want. 3) Conclusion a) Physician assisted suicide can help treat the terminally ill how they would like to be treated. b) The long history of assisted suicide speaks for itself in the matter of if it should be legal or