The Pros And Cons Of Obamacare

In America, universal healthcare would undermine principles important to the functioning of society; specifically, it would undermine individual liberty, free enterprise and free

Although, PPACA provides healthcare to everyone, in order to get money to insure all of these people, new taxes were created. The people who suffer the most are the ones that barley miss the Federal Poverty Level and can hardly afford the cost of living, much less having to pay for healthcare. With PPACA, the insurance companies must cover sick people and this causes everyone 's insurance cost to rise. Health insurance offered by businesses can be expensive, this means that lower wage workers might not be able to afford coverage and cannot get cost assistance. With this being said PPACA should be

The affordable care act is a United States statue signed into law by President Obama in March of 2010. It represents the most significant improvement to the U.S. healthcare system since 1965 with the addition of Medicare and Medicaid. Also known and commonly referred to as Obamacare, it was enacted to increase the affordability and quality of health insurance, diminish the rate of the uninsured by expanding public and private insurance coverage while reducing the cost of healthcare for individuals and the government. This law will require Hospitals and doctors to reconstruct financial practices along side with technologically and clinically to advance better outcomes, reduce cost and improve methods of accessibility.

President Obama spoke to the American people that government run health care with higher taxation, larger prices, and letting the insurance agencies operate with little to no rules were “wrong”. It was to improve and provide all Americans with affordable health care and easier access to doctors and medical care and offer subsidies

Because of reviewing the “Political Irony” and comparing the lesson it made me review and question several factors in the PPACA legislation what and how does this legislation offer Americans? As I view health care where it stands today, where it has mitigated from in the past decade it baffles my mind. It was in the 1960’s, when Lyndon B. Johnson brought about the first change for Americans health care to a system that required help. Medicare was implemented under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide health insurance to people age 65 and older, regardless of income or medical history due to its price and its unaffordability by people over the age of 65. In that same year under the Social Security Amendments of 1965 Medicaid

The Affordable Care Act, (ACA) often referred to as Obamacare, was signed into law March 23rd, 2010 and has quickly become a nightmare to millions of citizens nationwide. While there were fortunate people who benefited from the heavily subsidized and affordable healthcare that was not readily available before ACA was passed, many more people found that their once affordable healthcare was no longer an option due to new ACA requirements (how so?). ACA was designed to extend insurance benefits to roughly 30 million uninsured Americans. The Obama administration aimed to extend Medicaid and provide federal subsidies so lower and middle-class Americans could afford to buy private insurance. This act alone forced millions of Americans out of their

The Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare as it is more commonly known, introduced several changes to the U.S. healthcare system. The most significant was the introduction of healthcare insurance for all Americans through an individual mandate. This meant that people who did not have any form of health insurance were required by law to purchase coverage from one of the new exchanges (Blumberg & Holahan, 2019). This gave people more choices and a wider range of healthcare options. The Affordable Care Act also introduced significant changes to how health care is funded in the United States.

The United States is the only Western nation that does not authorize free health services to its people. The cost of healthcare to the uninsured is beyond prohibitive, and insurance plans are far more captivated with profit costs, rather

As the nation readies itself to make the transition from an Obama to Trump administration, Healthcare reform is at the top of the political agenda. Historically, healthcare reform proposals have been passionately debated with partisan politics, sometimes complicating or obfuscating attempts to reform. For example, in 1965, despite continued vocal opposition from the American Medical Association (AMA) and conservative Republicans, legislation establishing Medicare and Medicaid programs were signed into law under President Lyndon B. Johnson (Taylor, 2014). Most recently, of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) was adopted and subsequently implemented only after partisan divisiveness and bitter congressional fights. Despite its’ rocky history, health

Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act was signed into law in 2010 by President Obama. There are many changes that will and are happening because of this law. Citizens cannot be turned down for coverage because of preexisting conditions, and everyone is required by law to have health insurance coverage. Those citizens who cannot afford coverage will be able to get assistance paying for it unless they are under the poverty level. Those citizens will be able to get Medicaid if their state expands coverage.

Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.

The United States government is already very involved with insurance with Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare is already the second largest provider for insurance, covering 43.5 million in 2013. If Medicare and Medicaid was not available it would leave millions insured. If these millions had no insurance it would likely lead countless health problems in United States. These programs are specifically targeted to individuals who have no access to insurance or can not afford insurances.

But we already pay for healthcare in our taxes collectively and to insurance companies individually, and it's costing us dearly. We hear stories every day now about how someone died because they couldn't afford their medication or treatment. Of people suffering for years because they couldn't afford to see a doctor. We see the wasteland of suffering that our current system has given us, and we can't let the fear of change keep us from doing better, for all of our sakes.

In the year 2012 3 million more uninsured kids or young adults were added to insurance plans country wide which brings more money to the insurance companies (Amadeo,2018). These are just a few benefits of president obama and his healthcare regime which you have heard more disadvantages of this regime. And since Obama is out of office no one wants to stand up for his beliefs or this plan because it was actually helping the people with some disadvantages to the beneficiary and also a few to the insurer . But it was only looked at from the tax aspect not the coverage for everyone view point.

In most countries with universal health care, the provided coverage is not free as it may seem- it is paid for through higher taxes. An article from Forbes magazine by Canadian analyst Barua & Clemens in 2014 reported that in European countries such as the United Kingdom, the payroll taxes average 37%; this is more than double the average 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the US citizens. (Barua & Clemens) In many cases individuals pay into a system which they may never need to take advantage of, while others may contribute less but may reap more benefits. The article Jarret B. Wollstein reported in the article “National Health Insurance: A Medical Disaster”, that if the United States were to adopt a Canadian-style national health system the initial cost would be over $339 billion, and would likely require almost doubled payroll taxes or new taxes to be implemented.