The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

The primary argument against ratifying the constitution by the Anti-Federalists was that they imagined that the administration would be made would be too effective and they would simply be making ready for another government like the one that they had quite recently contended so energetically to free themselves from England. They likewise needed to include a Bill of Rights before endorsing the constitution and not afterward. The Pros are that the report had expressed to give trust against the unfeeling and unlawful demonstration of decision the american colonies. Freedom of development which is under Article IV. This area said the security and interminable associations and organization among the natives of the rose country.

One last thing the constitution has that stopped tyranny rule was making sure the smaller states got a fair vote in congress compared to the bigger states. They had a meeting called the constitutional convention where they proposed two distinct plans. The first was the Virginia plan where they favored large states, and wanted it to be based off of population. The second one was the New jersey plan which favored small states, and gave each state an equal amount of votes. They eventually came up with the great compromise, where they proposed that congress would be composed of the senate, and the house of representatives.

The Constitution came to fruition as an answer for the issues and numerous shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation. Not every person concurred with the Constitution or even the said issues emerging from the Articles of Confederation. These people were called Anti-Federalists and their thoughts would not be as effective as the thoughts of the Federalists, since Anti-Federalist thought's reflected numerous qualities of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution should have been endorsed with a specific end goal to conjure change and solvethe issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists had the plans to make the country the best is could be, and also sufficiently giving rights to citizens.

Before ratifying the Constitution, a constitutional convention was called in 1787 to change the Articles of Confederation. This meant that each state had only one vote in Congress, and the size didn’t matter. The debate was between the federalists and Anti-Federalist, one side wanted to ratify the constitution and the other side didn’t. It was not easy because there were documents and articles both supporting and going against it. Who are the federalists?

he Constitutional Convention was composed of men of strong principal; men with firm opinions and the education to support those views. Their patriotism and analytical prowess fueled the Convention and its countless debates, resulting in months of writing and perfecting the document that serves as our nation’s foundation. The delegates’ intensity caused them to continue haggling over details up until just days before the Constitution was completed. Such was the case on September 14th, 1787, a mere three days before the Constitution was sent off for ratification. Several issues were raised for discussion that day, including that of impeachment, the publication of all the proceedings of the lower house of Congress, and the appointment of a national

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

The Outcry The Constitutional Convention proved to solve the paradox of democracy because it created a strong government that balanced its powers equally. The “Great Compromise” is an example of how to address the minority rights and majority rule without resulting in anarchy or tyranny. The Government should use more compromises that will benefit both the minority and the majority equally. The Constitutional Convention took place because “the Articles of Confederation proved to be too weak to govern its citizens” (History).

The result of this victory enabled the following event to transpire: the Constitutional Convention. In 1787, four years after the American Revolution ended, George Washington and fellow influential people met in Philadelphia. The before them was imperative to the newly independent nation’s success. The newly formed Government needed to replace the Articles of Confederation, which had been hastily put together after the American Revolution. There needed to be a permanent and binding document that would unify the states as opposed to individual state power.

All the states except one, Rhode Island, signed the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution was ratified in 1781. It was needed because it had made America’s Government, set basic laws, and had some important rights that it granted for its citizens . The Articles of Confederation was America’s first governing document, it was very weak and gave the states to much power and allowed them to act independently. In the Articles of Confederation gave Congress way to much power but since the states were so free it could not enforce anything.

Federalists were known to support “loose construction” of the constitution which is defined by Oxford Dictionary as “A broad interpretation of a statute or document by a court.” Federalists believe that when making decisions in a court or when writing laws, they should be only based on the constitution rather than following the words of the constitution strictly. Due to the fact that the Constitution was signed in 1787, it would not be realistic years later to continue to completely and solely follow the constitution word by word because of our ever changing society and the Federalists realized this. I personally find that the Federalists were more realistic when choosing what to and not to

They argued that the Constitution would offer checks and balances, so the other branches of government can check and limit each other. The Federalists believed that the Federal Courts like the government

A concerning number of citizens of the United States today consider the United States Constitution to be a relic. A memorial to aspirational thought we are to remember with fondness and adapt to our own changing societal needs. This is an unfortunate frame of mind, for this document was not merely a pleasant thought in the minds of U.S. Founders, but a brilliantly conceived legal document at significant personal cost to the men and women who developed it. It is a document that has the ability to withstand the test of time. The principles of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness were not something one would likely find as the foundation of any political doctrine until the United States Constitution was conceived in response to the lack

The United States was founded when it declared its independence on July 2, 1776. The citizens of the US celebrate its birthday two days later because the language of the independence wasn’t finalized by Congress until July 4, 1776. When the US constitution was established it had made rules and regulations for the people to abide by as well as to grant rights for the people to have. The constitution was officially signed on September 17, 1787 by the people in the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. Before the constitution was ever created the states acted as if they were independent countries because the only document that they were being lead by was the Articles of Confederation.

It was known as a large state and what this plan proposed was having a strong central government that could collect tax and make stricter laws. Which was made up of three separate branches. The legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislative was the most powerful and would be bicameral which was based on population. This large state thought they

Federalism is one of the main topics in both the Constitution and the articles of Confederation. In the Articles of Confederation they decided that the states would have more power than the federal government. In the articles it mentions that, “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right…” Which means that the states will be more superior and have more impact on the people than the federal government. While for the Constitution it is not only the states and the federal government that has power but it’s the people that have some too.