The Pros And Cons Of Title IX

Case Name, Citation, Year Cook v. Florida High School Athletic Association (FHSAA), 09-cv-00547 M.D. Fla. (2009) Facts of the Case: On June 16, 2009 parents of female athletes at FHSAA member schools filed suit against the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida alleging that the newPolicy 6 discriminates against female students according to Title IX by reducing school participation in completions by 40 percent at the varsity level and 20 percent at the sub-varsity level. The plaintiffs also stated a complaint that male driven sports where exempt from this action because cheerleading was not recognized as a sport thus breaking the Title IX law. Issues: Why did Policy 6 reduced the number of competitions

Although Wells and Marbella suggest that men’s sports are being hurt because of Title IX, Goodale establishes that Title IX is not negatively impacting men’s athletics and is necessary for colleges to follow. Title IX, a 40-year law establishing equal opportunity for women has not negatively impacted men’s sports, as clarified in “40 Years Later, Title IX is Still Fighting Perception it Hurt Men’s Sports” by Gloria Goodale. First and foremost, sports like Football and Basketball take up a majority of a college budget for men’s sports, and when colleges cut minor teams such as baseball or tennis Title IX is unfairly blamed. A large amount of colleges decide to limit men’s athletic to large money-making sports such as football or basketball

Some argue that furthering options for female athletics would starve already successful men’s programs. This is, unfortunately, true to some extent. George F. Will writes in his article “A Train Wreck Called Title Ix” on the Newsweek website that colleges terminated over 400 men 's athletic teams to produce precise proportionality between the genders enrollments and participation in athletics. Although growing women’s athletics did cause some shortage in funding for men it is illogical to deny rights to one people group for the sake of having excess in another group. Female athletic programs were easy to blame for terminating some men’s programs, but if the funding were split more evenly between minor and major sports those programs might have

Prior to Title IX, women’s sports were largely ignored and underfunded, with limited opportunities for participation and scholarships. The law mandated equal opportunities for women in sports, leading to the growth of women’s athletics and also a significant increase in female participation in sports. In college, the implementation of Title IX was monitored by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), which ensured that schools followed the law by examining the number of scholarships, participation, opportunities, and resources allocated to women (Boschert 90). This led to an increase in the number of women’s teams, athletic scholarships, and facilities that provide equal opportunities for both

In the article titled Face-off on the playing field By, Judith B. Stamper explains girls have their own story of support or discrimination, success also the debate of girls be allowed to compete on boys’ sports team. First, the writer Title IX explains female athletes are been treated second-class for long enough and should pass of inequalities and biases of girls. The writer also clarifies that girls doing sports make them healthier, physically, and emotionally. Other girls that don’t play sports are less likely to use of drugs. In addition, she notes a former Stanford University basketball player Mariah says, strength and independence of things girls learn from sports, the opportunities that are changing women.

Title IX In the article, “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” Marbella and Wells talk about how Title IX is hurting men’s sports, while in the article “40 Years Later, Title IX Is Still Fighting Perception It Hurt Men’s Sports” Goodale talks about the benefits of Title IX. In the article “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” the authors describe how the guidelines of Title IX have been the reason for many men’s sports teams being cut in colleges. In the article it also talks about how the law has lost its way and has diminished opportunities for men as a result. It states, hundreds of men’s sports have been cut across the country because of schools citing Title IX.

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” What is Title IX On June 23, 1972, Richard M. Nixon (the President at the time) signed Title IX of the Education Amendment, into decree. Title IX is a wide-ranging federal law that forbids discrimination based on sex in all federally sponsored education programs or activity’s. Title IX is a law that was put into effect in 1972, that entails gender equity for girls and boys in the United States educational programs that receives federal funding.

We need to figure out the origins, legislative and judicial landmarks and also the conflict behind it. Also we need to see how it’s impacted athletics. The ones who’ve been impacted most would be the women’s US soccer team. They have figured out that they are getting paid less and don 't get the benefits the men’s US soccer team gets. They have been paid less than the men soccer team has been paid.

Title nine requires athletic programs to be equivalent to enrollment. The number of sports programs for each sex should reflect the ratio of students enrolled in the school. With more women attending college the need for more sports programs has grown dramatically. I don’t want to get in a political discussion about schools who have cut men’s programs so I will only speak on schools who have added women’s programs. This opportunity has not only improved

Some aspects of Title IX will tell you which side you will decide on. Even though I think Title IX is fair to men and women some may disagree with me. They might say that since Title IX seems to be paying more attention to girls they tend to cut out equal rights for men such as playing sports.

Title IX was signed into law in 1972 and it required equality for male and female students in each educational program and activity that received federal funding. This means that universities had to offer sports that women could participate in. The reasons Title IX came into being was a demand from Women’s Rights organizations for equal opportunities. Prior to 1972, sports, competition, and many other university programs were generally considered to be masculine and “ not ladylike.”

• Title IX made it so that no person should be excluded from, denied benefits of, or subjected to discrimination from any educational institution or federally funded program or activity due to their sex. o Educational institutions are defined as any public or private preschool, primary, or secondary school, institution of vocational, professional, or higher education school. Exclusions include any educational institution of more than one school, college, or department which contain their own admissions in separate departments. • Subject to prohibition applies only to vocational, professional, graduate, higher education, and public undergraduate higher education institutions.

Title IX is a landmark piece of legislation that is now 42 years old and still going strong in representing mainly women’s athletics and establishing a foundation to stand and improve upon. Before this piece of legislation, men’s sports dominated women’s sports in all aspects, both in money, participation, physicality etc. With this law being established women now have a stronger presence in the sporting world because of this law. Women’s sports still have a long way to come in gaining media attention especially in big tournaments like NCAA March madness. Title IX is now turning into controversial debates with the increase of women’s sports and programs for athletics but to make room for these sports, some men’s sports have to be cut.

Women in sports can compete the same, and sometimes even stronger, as men so their pay should just be as much as them, and the gender pay gap shouldn’t be present. If both sexes play the exact same sport, why do they have different fiscal values? Many female athletes are equally talented compared to men so they should at least get paid the same. “The U.S. women’s team will get a $2 million bonus for winning the FIFA Women 's World Cup. A lot of money to you and me, yes.

If society stops to understand the struggles these women have been facing for decades will have a clearer picture of what steps to take in order to make a change in the sports industry. Men need to put their masculinity aside and advocate giving women a voice. The purpose of this paper is to explore the issues women in the sport world have faced through history, wage gaps, current issues today, and to discuss findings and recommendations for future research. Title IX is a law that came into effect in 1972, this comprehensive federal law prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity.