The Rocking Horse Winner And The Prodigal Son Analysis

Also, the story ends with some casting of the first stone and Jackson (1948) prefers to leave the gruesome details to the reader’s imagination. Nevertheless, in The Rocking-Horse Winner story, after Paul’s mother learns where her money comes from, the boy claims to be lucky, but sadly he died soon afterward. Oscar tells his sister “My God, Hester, you’re eighty-odd thousand to the good and a poor devil of a son to the bad. But, poor devil, poor devil, he’s best gone out of a life where he rides his rocking-horse to find a winner.”

This made me question my beliefs because I would never look down on my mother just because she is poor. Jeannette’s mom was always their for her and never just left like her father

Although she was successful in not obsessing over money and herself, she was, like any young girl, left with an emptiness. Abigail was stuck with an uncle who had “no interest in children” (Miller 134). In the Puritan religion, family is very important, yet the reverend of Salem had no interest in his own. He could not show his niece love and affection, but he was a “man of God”. Although Abigail, luckily, was not influenced by his narcissistic ways, he was still her only parental example.

There are similarities and differences to be found in the stories through God’s provisions, the father/son relationships, and their tones.

and it was all about the money and the fact that she did not want to be “alone” in this world. This is a red flag because it shows how Addie put herself before her own child. Having a parent that is not selfless especially when it comes to their own children reflects on how they treat others in life, and how it ruins a child’s perception of life, people, and feelings. This becomes a problem because they have trouble working with each other since they all distant themselves during this time. It is ironic because especially if a loved one has a short amount of time left, one would think that they would be closer than

One of the most important similarity is that both stories are well enjoyed over generations and teach great life lessons that serve the sole purpose of the

mother. Paul wanted that his mother could celebrate her birthday diligently and dignity by having all facilities leaving aside past deprivation. He managed handsome money indirectly through lawyer in the name of some unknown relative who deposited this money on the condition to pay Paul mother at the time of her birthday in instalments. His mother received a letter from lawyer and when she approached lawyer, she insisted to receive whole money at a time that was one thousand pounds. This showed that Hester thought of only herself and she wanted to get all the money at once on the proclamation that she had to pay back her debts but instead of paying her debts, she spent all money in extravagant.

She once stated that at a funeral she would not let her mother console her, only her grandmother. Yet, the other children are more attached to their mother. The eldest is also closer to the grandfather as she is his caregiver and is to carry on certain traditions that he will pass down to her. All of these patterns are a result of years of family addictions, abuse, divorce, and many other conflicts. Yet, they continue to work to change the cycle and have hope for a better life for their

Likewise, they share a common theme that man should not disobey the gods. The outcome when man disobeys the gods is always bad. Man should not try to be like the gods by disobeying them. Both stories have their own gods and protagonist who disobeyed the gods.

After her reply, he then told her that he was lucky too. Unknown to his mother, the boy gave this statement because he was secretly gambling on horse races with the aid of the family’s gardener. The gardener and the boy became very successful and became very wealthy. The boy had begun participating in this activity because he had noticed that they family was in need of money. He had noticed that the house was “haunted by the unspoken phrase: There must be more money!

All of these traits can be seen in Paul while he is riding his rocking horse. When Paul’s mother walked into his room, she saw him “madly surging on his rocking horse... ‘It’s Malabar!’ he screamed, in a powerful, strange voice... [Then] his eyes blazed at her for one strange and senseless second” (1259).

Not only she is someone who tries to manipulate her family, she is the main reason of her family’s death. There were parts of the story that showed her character. For instance, “ in my time…, children were more respectful of their native states and their parents”, as she said this she sounds reasonable to believe, but it does not end there. There were more parts to the story where manipulation is seen as she tries it on her grandchildren as well. “There was a secret panel in this house,” she had said which looks like she is not telling the truth.

One big similarity is foreshadowing. This took place in both articles, for, “Charles,” an example of foreshadowing is when he had to think who misbehaved and said than finally said, “Charles.” An example of foreshadowing in, “The Lottery,” is when Old Man Warner says, “ Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.” This can indicate that the people of the village are sacrificing a human, which they are.

“There are three gates to self-destructive hell: lust, anger, and greed” was a quote of an Indian text called the Bhagavad Gita. Chaucer’s stories “the wife of bath” and “pardoner 's tale” in Canterbury Tales are good examples of the Indian text written in two different stories. In both of the tales Chaucer describes greed into very distinct ways, one involves a greed for lust the other involves a greed for money. In Chaucer 's the pardoner 's tale you can easily tell the type of greed that is in the story ,which is the greed for money. This is also one of the most ironic tale since the pardoner is the most greediest person amongst the group.

His idiosyncrasy remains loving and understanding, even when his younger son returned home after many of been away with not a penny to his name. The young son showed disobedience to all the goodness his father had offered to him. The young son showed traits such as selfishness as well as being ungrateful. He had no worth for his father’s property nor did he want to work alongside his father on the family farm.