Title IX And Its Effects On Women And Sports

1. Summarize the main point of this episode on The Story of American Public Education. American citizens that were segregated had finally had enough of their unequal education. With the help of the many educational reforms, all American children were finally able to get an equal education. People were no longer separated based on their color or gender, and had been given the rights guaranteed to them by the constitution.

Although Wells and Marbella suggest that men’s sports are being hurt because of Title IX, Goodale establishes that Title IX is not negatively impacting men’s athletics and is necessary for colleges to follow. Title IX, a 40-year law establishing equal opportunity for women has not negatively impacted men’s sports, as clarified in “40 Years Later, Title IX is Still Fighting Perception it Hurt Men’s Sports” by Gloria Goodale. First and foremost, sports like Football and Basketball take up a majority of a college budget for men’s sports, and when colleges cut minor teams such as baseball or tennis Title IX is unfairly blamed. A large amount of colleges decide to limit men’s athletic to large money-making sports such as football or basketball

In the article titled Face-off on the playing field By, Judith B. Stamper explains girls have their own story of support or discrimination, success also the debate of girls be allowed to compete on boys’ sports team. First, the writer Title IX explains female athletes are been treated second-class for long enough and should pass of inequalities and biases of girls. The writer also clarifies that girls doing sports make them healthier, physically, and emotionally. Other girls that don’t play sports are less likely to use of drugs. In addition, she notes a former Stanford University basketball player Mariah says, strength and independence of things girls learn from sports, the opportunities that are changing women.

First of all, some argues that the tittle IX grants equal sporting opportunities for both male and female students; however, the inequality or unfair treatment for female athletic student still exists. At every high school or college, young female athletics are still facing with the discrimination on the playing field. Women and girls just receive only 42 percent of the opportunities to play sports in high school and college even though female were half of total students.

Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education 2005 Kirsten Dooley Liberty High School AP Government 2A Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education was a U.S. Supreme Court case surrounding sex discrimination and people who face retaliation for trying to uphold Title IX of the Education Amendments. Roderick Jackson was a high school girls’ basketball coach at Ensley High school that was fired after complaining that his team was denied equal treatment as far as funding and access to equipment. Jackson sued for retaliation, and the case would be heard in the Supreme Court in 2005. This case was important in deciding that those who are retaliated against for arguing sex discrimination, even though they may not have faced it themselves,

Title IX has had significant effects on women's sports and education. Originally, women were allowed to be on intermural teams and play on play days or sport days with various females on their team because no team roster was dictated. Through this opportunity, women were given a taste of competition and what they could be doing. DGWS was formed to promote female sports, train referees for women's sports, hold clinics for coaches, and dictate rules of the game for female sports. At this time, the focus of women's sports was about having fun and enjoying the sport, not about competing.

I believe that Title IX policy has many pros and cons. I feel that some of the pros include equal opportunities in education and sports. I believe that this policy was placed in effect with the intent to stop discrimination and provide equality for men and women. Another pro includes the attempt to help women become equal and grow in order to become highly reputable in the community. On the other hand, I believe the cons involve the possibility of decreased funding if the school fails to provide rationale if the number of men and women participants in sports is not equal.

In addition, the opponents of Title IX might also agree that football should be withdrawn from the Title IX’s list as women do not play football. Nevertheless, before making the statements that a sport should be eliminated in the Title IX equation due the lack of one gender’s participation, one should consider other sports where there are only a small number of men compared to the women participants. Particularly in volleyballs and field hockey, they are males and females player. However in this case, men participants are outnumbered by the females athletes (Zimmerman). So, should volleyball and hockey be removed from Title IX privileges too?

Title nine requires athletic programs to be equivalent to enrollment. The number of sports programs for each sex should reflect the ratio of students enrolled in the school. With more women attending college the need for more sports programs has grown dramatically. I don’t want to get in a political discussion about schools who have cut men’s programs so I will only speak on schools who have added women’s programs. This opportunity has not only improved

Some aspects of Title IX will tell you which side you will decide on. Even though I think Title IX is fair to men and women some may disagree with me. They might say that since Title IX seems to be paying more attention to girls they tend to cut out equal rights for men such as playing sports.

There are many little boys and girls who want to grow up and be professional athletes. They have hopes and dreams and put in the hard work and effort to achieve them. What they do not know is how different their lives are if they make it in this profession. While the men are able to live pretty comfortably, the women usually struggle to make a living, and they most often live with other teammates or family to help split the bills. They are often “forced” to play all year round, even overseas.

Women's hockey is played up to to a college level, but there is no professional level. Why? There are 35 D1 women's hockey teams in the NCAA. The only chance for them after college is playing in the Olympics. Girls can play hockey in their childhood and fall in love with it, and become very good at it.

People are finally realizing women can earn the same amount of money that men athletes do, and the people are responding. Women’s sports have a great support team behind them. People are willing to take the time and watch them play. Women’s sports teams and athletes are becoming more and more sponsored. Women, athletes individually are also more looked upon, which is also a great sign.

They’ve accomplished all of these things, and it proves that they are strong females that are capable of doing what was once an men’s job, such as being in the war. Besides, women have gotten past the inequality, and proved that they’re capable of doing just as well. So why is this any different with sports and equal pay? For example, say females got paid less than males for being in the army; doing the same things, trying just as hard, risking their life, and not getting paid the same amount. That is how female athletes are feeling currently about this

If society stops to understand the struggles these women have been facing for decades will have a clearer picture of what steps to take in order to make a change in the sports industry. Men need to put their masculinity aside and advocate giving women a voice. The purpose of this paper is to explore the issues women in the sport world have faced through history, wage gaps, current issues today, and to discuss findings and recommendations for future research. Title IX is a law that came into effect in 1972, this comprehensive federal law prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity.