To What Extent Were The Federalists Opposed The Louisiana Purchase Dbq Essay

Napoleon Bonaparte intended to continue war in Europe and needed money; therefore, the American representatives and the French government decided on a price of $15 million for the whole Louisiana territory. This acquisition, known as the Louisiana Purchase, basically doubled the land of the United States at a price of thirteen and one-half cents per acre before interest costs. Jefferson was trapped between his morals and reality, as the Constitution never directly granted the government authority to obtain new territory, but the land would assure the agricultural business’s growth. The Federalist Party opposed the Louisiana Purchase because it would diminish the significance of their strongholds on the east coast, and Republican Jefferson decided against giving them an issue by lingering over the treaty’s

This is an important part of the book because it is in this debate and subsequent decisions that had a lot to do with the shaping the nation. The Louisiana Purchase being such an enormous amount of land that the United States government had virtually no control over. It opened the door to opportunity for people, like Aaron Burr. Then the story puts the reader on the shores of the north river in New Jersey, following Burr as he awaits Hamilton in the infamous duel between the two. The two best lawyers in New York were there because of a dispute about negative words being printed in the paper.

The war of 1812 contributed to the Federalist Party to disappear due to the administrations of Jefferson and Madison. The party transformed from a party of national power to a party of the privilidged. A huge contribution was the Louisiana Purchase and how I grew the size of the US and the three-fifths rule which was an issue, and it was more of a Western problem that it was of a southern issue. There was two main influences that impacted the Federalist Party to end. One was the Embargo Act of 1807 it was damaging to the people which left their lives and havoc and having harsh effects that left many Americans either in bankruptcy, jail , debt ,and even some were unemployed.

-The Louisiana Purchase caused formation of new states, access to the Mississippi river system,increase in geographic and scientific knowledge, increased conflict with american indians, and it added more territory to the U.S. . Louisiana Purchase and Exploration The Constitution affected the Louisiana purchase because of the Purchase's constitutionality "Nowhere does the Constitution authorize the executive branch of the government to spend public funds to expand the boundaries of the nation. " This was a problem for Thomas Jefferson since he was after all elected by a "political philosophy that emphasized small government, low taxes, and "strict construction" of the Constitution"In conclusion by Jefferson's many ways technically the Louisiana purchase could

Jefferson had to go against principles in order to do what was best for the United States at the time. In a letter to John Dickinson, Jefferson wrote: “It has not given it power of holding foreign territory, and still less of incorporating it into the Union. An amendment of the Constitution seems necessary for this… In the meantime we must ratify and pay our money, as we have treated, for a thing beyond the Constitution, and rely on the nation to sanction an act done for its greater good” (NCC Staff). The Louisiana Purchase was necessary for the United States because the benefits of the Purchase largely outweighed the detriments.

I agree with the view that the Louisiana Purchase of 1803 contradicts Jefferson’s stance on not granting the federal government too much power because in fact, the purchase of this vast territory by the government did give federal authorities more power than was acceptable to the people. Additionally, purchasing new land was not stated in the Constitution; therefore, government did not have the right to take this course of action. As stated in “Jeffersonian Ideology” from Jefferson’s point of view: “Limiting the federal government flowed from his strict interpretation of the Constitution.” Jefferson had always been known to make strict interpretations of the federal government’s powers, but because of his desire to acquire new land in the

Yet the federal us movement saw this is supporting flexibility not stability within the nation. McCoy describes these ideas of the Republicans with their own bias view giving a more enlightened look at Republicans compared to Kerber Article that gives a persistent view of their opportunity as federalist and their success with political however after reading McCoys article sheds light on how Jefferson did not want to industrialize the country a feeling that there was little need and that the ideal diss taste meant for proletariat on industry labor and also discussions and arguments over Louisiana purchase. Federal us at this time so this purchase to be random and unneeded where Jefferson sought is the importance of expansion of the country and contributing to a realistic power being added to the

Also, The purchase was nearly canceled by Congress and only passed by a vote of 59-57. And, Thomas Jefferson wanted to buy the settlement of New Orleans from the French. It was a major seaport

Introduction After independence from the British in the American Revolution, America continued using the Articles of Confederation in their government. With time, these proved to be inadequate, and the peoples representatives came together in an effort to create a newer, better form of government leading to the creation of a New Nation. In 1783, the American Revolution was concluded by the British and American negotiators in Paris, ‘granting independence to the United States while the Canadian provinces were reserved to the British Empire’. This was marked by the signing of the Paris Treaty, which ended a seven- year war between the French and Indians in North America.

Although Thomas Jefferson, leader of the Confederate States of America, also disagreed with the application of slavery because he stated lists of British crimes, within which one list stated that slavery, which was supposed to be prohibited, was forced to America, he still disagreed with the thorough abrogation of slavery because he knew that land owners who based their business and life on slavery would be completely bankrupted and would bring too much uncertainty to the economy within the whole country. [4]These all led to the strong opposition of the south, whose development was based on slavery and free trade with foreign countries. States such as Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina dissented the tariff-raising law to be unconstitutional and thus a political combat emerged. The contradiction sharpened after the Jefferson’s Louisiana Purchase in 1803 and the following expansion of territories. The north insisted categorizing the new states to be free states whereas the south wanted to make them slave states.

The Federalists opposed the Louisiana Purchase because of practical reasons. It increased conflict with American Indians. The Louisiana Purchase was also opposed because of the constitutionality. It was opposed because of the political balance in the new territory. Hamilton states “the territory is not yet populated”.

Also, with the control of the Mississippi river we could now have stronger trade and be able to use the Mississippi river for different things. This evidence supports that it was a very smart move that the United States decided to make the Louisiana Purchase with France. To conclude, the Louisiana Purchase was a very smart move by the United States because this allowed many positive thing to happen. First, it allowed the western country to have peace and prosperity mainly with the Indians and opened a free and valuable market. Second, it doubled the size of the United States making it a bigger and stronger nation.

When Napoleon of France realized his plan to use the Louisiana territory was unsuccessful, he made a deal with Thomas Jefferson to buy the land with only fifteen million dollars (class lecture). A deal that cannot be ignored with a land that’s only about three cents an acre, Jefferson again had to bend his belief of strict interpretation of the constitution and admitted to the Senators (class lecture, 214). Thomas Jefferson’s decision was accepted, and the senators registered their prompt approval of the transaction (214). Jefferson again deserved the B+ because he changed and adjust his belief to benefit the common good of the United States, which was doubling its size by purchasing the Louisiana Territory

The quarter began with an overview of the Louisiana Purchase and a glimpse at the influence Thomas Jefferson had on American nationalism. Students applied their understanding of the time period writing press releases explaining Jefferson's refusal to pursue a third term as president. The War of 1812, the Early American Industrial Revolution, the Monroe Doctrine, and the Missouri Compromise rounded out the major topics of study. Throughout the quarter students examined and discussed historical artifacts including journal entries, paintings, and editorial cartoons.

Jefferson’s dilemma in the Louisiana Purchase In April of 1803 Thomas Jefferson was faced with many moral dilemmas in the process of buying the Louisiana territory. Though the price for the territory was beyond generous, Jefferson felt that by purchasing the territory he would be going against his beliefs that the constitution should be followed word for word. The constitution said nothing of the president having the power to purchase land from another government, or to use money of the states for the same purpose (“the moral dilemma”). Another problem was once the land was purchased, there was a fear that it could have been a waste since they had no way to know the layout of the land, and what it would be useful for.