Universal Healthcare Behavior

The need for improved and less expensive healthcare in the United States has attracted people to form a group advocating for a universal healthcare system. Some of the major objectives of the organization are to enhance healthcare accessibility, make healthcare more affordable through the creation of new products and services, integrate technology in healthcare delivery for easier navigation, and also improve healthcare standards for the entire American population. Despite the expected positive implications of having a universal healthcare system in the country, some people are not aware of its existence. In this regard, it is important to discuss the need for universal healthcare system in the United States and its negative aspects; this

Megan McCardle and Claudia Chaufan have brought many different opinions about healthcare reform. In “Liberals Are Wrong: Free Market Health Care is Possible" by Megan McCardle, she has argued that is not available for people to purchase the right and needed healthcare. Besides that, Claudia Chaufan has stated that people can purchase their own healthcare plans and also mentioned about the single-payer plan. Although having some shared ideas about health insurances, each of the authors had their significant concepts. Based on “Ken Arrow’s critique of healthcare markets”, Megan McCardle has indicated her opposition against him.

Healthcare and access to medical aid vary from country to country, and because of this inconsistency, there has been an ongoing debate on which country has it right. While America is Canada’s closest neighbour, our countries have prominent differences when comparing our Healthcare Systems. Although the United States health care has vastly improved since 2010, the system still acts with major flaws leaving over 30 million residents without health coverage today. Throughout this essay, I will be comparing at the drastic differences of Healthcare Systems in Canada and the United States. The most prevalent differences between the two healthcare systems would be that Canada has a universal healthcare plan for citizens and the U.S has private and public plan.

In Chapter 14, I have learned that the U.S. health care system has the most expensive healthcare system in the world and the price tag is expected to increase. Health care is only available to people who have health insurance or have health care through a public program or those that can afford to pay out of pocket. The U.S health care system, unlike other systems in the world, does not provide healthcare services to all citizens. Healthcare is very expensive, citizen without would be unable to afford it if they had to pay themselves. Individuals rely on health insurance to pay a large portion of their healthcare costs.

However, when compared with other health care systems in the developed world, the U.S. is one of the few countries that doesn’t provide its citizens with universal coverage while also being the most costly (Dalen et al., 2015; Hirsch & Lyman, 2014). The individual mandate combined with provisions within the ACA guide the U.S. health care system towards universal coverage. Universal health care provides security to all people and it is in the best interest of public health. Despite the popular arguments made against the mandate, it is evident that it is not just economical but also, is in line with American values. The mandate ensures equitable health insurance for all which protects the rights of the American people to have access to quality health

Unlike many other countries, the United States has both private and public healthcare options. Private insurance companies are often offered through employers or are available on the healthcare market at a higher cost. Public insurance is meant to help people who cannot afford these private insurance agencies. The involvement of our government within these two groups, often leads people into the debate of other healthcare options, such as universal healthcare, and if our government should be taking such an active role in our healthcare industry.

There has to be some type of insurance that is affordable for every person that provides them with at least the minimum benefits. Some health benefits are better than none at all. This will give people a higher expectancy of living a longer life, as oppose to somebody who has no medical coverage. Our lack of universal coverage has consequences. According to government and private studies, about 22,000 of our fellow Americans die each year of treatable diseases because they lack insurance and can’t afford a doctor.

The idea of Universal Health Care (UHC), has been a hot topic since ObamaCare passed in 2010, but recently the debate has become fundamental when talking about US politics. Universal Health Care in the United States would essentially be the highest possible health care for everyone, without citizens being put in a financial burden (Cheng). Even with Universal Health Care, citizens would be able to purchase higher healthcare options if wanted. So what’s the catch? Well, in summary the catch is the cost.

So because you get to stop paying for insurance you don’t get to stop paying taxes used for the medicines needed. The second problem is, “In the United Kingdom, which has a right to health care, a 2002 study by the British National Health Service found that it was ‘critically short of doctors and nurses’”states procon.org. They say possible doctors will not want to be doctors, because many doctors’ pay will drop a lot with the universal healthcare system. Procon.org states that, “A right to health care could lower the quality and availability of disease screening and treatment.” This would be because with free healthcare hospitals and other medical facilities income would be cut short and they may not be able to afford the most helpful or the newest technology or research.

We the people, of the United States, want to be independent. We want to be different and provide for ourselves. We don’t want to be like the rest of the developed world. So we don’t have something that nearly every developed country in the world has: universal healthcare. Though it is seen internationally as a human right(1) and we are more than wealthy enough to provide this service to our citizens, we still refuse to provide healthcare for everyone in our country.

Health care in many parts of the world is considered a basic right that should be given to people. Access is crucial in order to ensure the efficient delivery of basic health care services. In general, health care systems are organized in order to provide treatment of diagnosed health care problems and these systems are usually government-run, meaning they utilize the people's taxes. Though most of the health care systems differ, they share common goals and outcomes as well as features that identify them with the universal health standards. Since the end of the Second World War, universal health coverage remained a contentious public issue in the United States.

Introduction At one point in time, American healthcare was considered the best in the world, while France takes the number one spot. What happened? The United States of America has a history of healthcare system that is a little different from most first world nations. Due to capitalism, this has greatly prevented us from developing a sophisticated and more caring national healthcare, the type that France (#1), United Kingdom (#18), and Canada (#30) are averagely content with.

In this case, the right to live does not seem to be extended to all Americans. Universal health care will ensure a higher life expectancy, reduce cost of medical treatment through a single-payer method, and improve medical treatments. The United States will gain a higher life expectancy rate from a universal health care system. Harvard researchers found a “40% increased risk of death among the uninsured” (“Right to Health Care”). Low-income families will refuse treatment because of their inability to cover all of the medical cost.

Universal health care is at it’s most fundamental level economical, due to the amount of money it could save for the U.S. Additionally, it has the most compassion for society through its solutions to inequalities in wealth within the context of health protection and helping those with preexisting conditions. Although, Universal health may have disadvantages within the country 's tax system these are offset by the advantages that it provides to coverage and quality of medical management. Overall, during the past two weeks, my viewpoints have changed but not drastically. Before starting our research into insurance and health care I had a firm stance towards total government controlled healthcare primarily because of my parents talking about how the current insurance system we have has been a total scam.

A call for a broad based health plan would greatly assist in helping to meet the health care costs (p. 155). Although the provision of jobs and more sustainable industries can help to cushion out the effects of poverty there will always be a niche of underprivileged individuals if the capitalist system is not eradicated. References 1. Deloughery, G. (1998).