In recent years, the number of people who have been attending university greatly increased, consequently, arguments have continued as to whether students should pay for this prerogative or not. With no doubts, everything has its two sides and the problem of whether the university fees should be paid by taxpayers or not is not an exception. Still, there are people who believe that authorities should take the responsibility for funding the university fees. However, others disagree and opine that it is solely the responsibility of students to pay for their higher education that is in a direct connection to their prospering future career and life in general. In this way, it is important to review both sides of this controversial question. So, this essay will focus on evaluating arguments for and against free education in university. First of all, it is essential to assess arguments in favor of making university education free for all interested. First of all, in further, it will inspire more and more people to attend university and, doubtless, this will benefit society as it will lead to a more prolific as well as educated workforce. What is more, generally, researches show that those countries that …show more content…
The reason I think this way is that in this case everyone gets a chance to go to the university and that free education can interest more students in the long run and finally lead to more people getting a higher education. Universities in a number of developing countries are very expensive and this scares a lot of potential students since for most of them, getting university education means that they will have to get student loans and be in debt for a long period of time. If universities would provide free education, then, not only those young people who come from rich families but everyone who wants to study in the university will have an equal opportunity to receive a graduate
They would be prepared for their classes and not worry about their own financial situation or other issues regarding their personal education. In short, free college benefits to students because it makes students more pay attention to their
People who receive an education are more likely to be successful and live a healthy and happy live; but those do not are more likely to live in poverty. Since it will help the economy to have better equipped citizens, the government should make college education free for
It will encourage learners to concentrate on their studies, and encourage them to work harder in school. In result, a significant increase in student grades will rise. Therefore, the opportunity will create student, specifically low-income student to have more advantages. Firstly, college should be granted to students freely because it will encourage them to concentrate on their educations.
Colleges should be free .Why? College is a place that students come and have their education. Everyone no matter what; if their poor they should not pay. Whoever don’t tale the advantage of college been free should be kicked out. College is not for games, it’s for to take it serious.
Or another effect that students are not well prepare enough for the real world because they just try to get the degree to graduate and actually not learn anything. If going to college is free, it is similar of students go to elementary, middle or high school, they are just going to school and are not really think ahead of their future. But when students get to college, hopefully they are old enough to realize what is best for them. If free college could happen, students should be thankful for that and try their best to achieve what they want. College should be free because of it can makes a big effect on student 's lives.
College should be free in the United States for multiple reasons. These reasons include, but are not limited to, the following. College is too expensive for the majority of the population of the United States. If college was free, it would let people explore their horizon, and have an easier time finding a desirable career. College has been proven to be effective, and even shown to have been working in the united states for over 100 years.
According to a statement of Aaron Bady, a journalist, regarding education in various universities, he stated that “Public education should be free. If it isn't free, it isn't public education.” The
Therefore, college should be free for students to educate the community, and develop the
Opponents of free college tuition claim that if students want to go to a university they can search for a scholarship. Maybe free education could give us more students in universities. But, it would be just like high school again. People who were bad and screw around in high school will be bad and they will do the same. They will negatively affect students who really want to study and work hard.
In the end, free education is never free as the youths will have to pay back for the tuition with excessive taxes. Also, offering free tuition will lower the value of education, and this will translate to lower productivity in the job market. Human beings tend to value the things that they have worked for and therefore offering the education at zero costs means that the students may never take their studies seriously. The government can also adopt different alternatives to the free education without necessarily hurting the economy. Having so many graduates will impact negatively on the job sector.
College should be free for everyone for the kids with less money, it would help some actually go and be successful in life and they would have more freedom to choose what they want to do. Many smart kids who are more likely to succeed have little money and cannot afford it. Statistics show that kids who are wealthier have a better chance at being more educated because they don't have to worry about not going to a good college. If college was free everyone would have the same opportunities, little money or not. The less fortunate kids who are smarter could get into the big colleges like Harvard and be able to get to the levels they are actually at.
Sacrifice is the abundance of things for the purpose of getting something else back. Sometimes sacrificing one thing will give back many things. The question is why governments should sacrifice its money on funding colleges and universities and make college education be free of fees? And what things can the government have back by doing this? These days with the rising living coasts and tuition fees, it can be easily expected that an average families with an average income will have to struggle to pay the fees to university to have their child educated.
“ ( trade-schools.net/articles/should-college-be-free.asp). This shows with college tuition being free more people can be happy and less stressful. In addition, college education should be free since it gives students the life that they wanted and concentrating on their studies. College tuition should be free because it could
Education is vital to one’s life and well-being, however since education isn’t free so many kids around the world can’t take advantage of it simply because of their economic status. When people become educated, it allows them to develop different perspectives and would not only see an improvement in their life, but in society as a whole. There’s no doubt that education is the most important thing to enhance the lives of individuals. Without it, kids aren’t able to reach their full potential, causing citizens to experience major issues in life such as a low standard of living, ignorance, and among other things. Education should be free for everyone, regardless of their economic background, because every individual is important and should have the equal opportunity to better themselves.