Nation-State System: Questions And Answers

A nation is defined as a large group of people that associate with a particular territory and is united in seeking to form a government of that area. The United States, in the Revolutionary War, fought for independence, just as many other nation-states have done so over the years. The history of a formal Scotland can be traced back to the 9th century, or earlier by some accounts. On September 18, 2014, the people of Scotland, after a very long and intense campaign, voted to stay as a part of the United Kingdom.

The idea of a federalist government is great, however, it has some downsides as well. Some advantages of federalism include keeping the government closer to the people, where states have the freedom and authority to make government decisions to local preferences. Federalism also allows local differences to reflected in the state and local government policy and reduce conflicts, this reduces the friction between interests and lessens conflict. The independent subnational governments allow for flexibility and experimentation, where successful policy innovations in one state can be adopted by other states and also the federal government. The achievement of at least some national goals is made easier by the participation of independent subnational

1. What are the 3 principles of judicial review established by the Marbury v. Madison decision? How can this be connected to nationalism? Extra credit- How can this be connected to recent events? -The 3 principles of judicial review established by the Marbury v. Madison: 1.

This is when independent states have their own sovereign authority, with some power given to a national government (Morone, 110). This is what we had under the Articles of Confederation, which was a

Federalists were property owners, creditors, and merchants. They believed that elites were the most fit to govern. They feared "excessive democracy" because they thought uneducated people would get into office. Federalists favored a strong national government and they believed in "filtration," which was when only elites could obtain governmental power. The leaders of the Federalist party were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and George Washington.

One of the biggest issues in this time period was

Nationalism is the pride for one’s country, the love that one has for its country and it is the want for the good of all people in the nation. This love is not conditional, it does not depend on race religion or economic standing. When a leader is chosen, when a country is coming out of great national change, this requires a particularly strong leader who only wishes for their countries greatness and success in the future. However, this can quickly turn into ultranationalism, or expose ultranationalistic motives. The two concepts of one’s love for their country have similarities, one is formed from the other, or that each can be provokers of change in either direction in the political spectrum.

During the early nineteenth century the idea of nationalism was born. Nationalism is a strong feeling of pride in your country. It is the idea of one country being better than all others. Before the idea of nationalism took shape, cultures living in Europe were spread throughout large multi-cultural empires. These cultures didn't feel any ties to other people of the same culture, they only felt loyalty to the king or queen.

Nationalism is a powerful force that unifies large groups of people based on commonalities such as ethnicity or religion. There are numerous examples of nationalistic forces throughout the 20th century, such as rationing and the home front that took place in WWI, the Red Army and the CCP of the Interwar Years, and ultranationalistic Nazi Germany and Japan in WWII. Nationalism is the driving force behind many of the world’s greatest accomplishments and atrocities and it helped to shape the world in the 20th century because it contributed to the WWI effort, set the stage for WWII, and caused two significant atrocities during the second World War. WWI displays nationalism in the way that home countries drew support for the war effort and rationed food for their soldiers. During the WWI effort,

Perhaps the Constitution is one of the greatest accomplishments of the United States of America. The United State’s Constitution was revolutionary to government; it was the first of its kind to actually work. The Constitution did not just appear overnight; it took the effort of many headstrong, liberty-minded people to accomplish the government that we still hold fast to and cherish today. One might consider the Revolutionary Era as the initial start of the Constitutional government that the United States has today. In the eighteenth century, Britain ruled the American Colonies with salutary neglect up until the late 1700s.

Through the structure of a government, a society is able to create a foundation for norms, values, and appropriate rules of law. More specifically, a government is what form the boundaries within a society, making it the leading factor in how people live. One example of this is the government’s decision of law. The people have to follow a set of rules in order to survive in their nation. Various other instances express why the politics of a nation are most important.

Nationalism has too often been dismissed as an irrational creed due to its association with disastrous results over the decades. But undeniably, it is a dominating force in contemporary international politics. It is important to understand nationalism if we want to understand global political developments. Many books have been written on this subject, but David Miller’s On Nationality stands out. This book takes on a distinctive approach to the study of nationalism, rendering it one of a kind in this field.

A nation stems from a pre-existing history. It does not require that all the members be alike but they must have a bond of solidarity to the other members of the nation. Nationalism is a movement for the attainment and maintenance of unity, identity and autonomy of a population that its members consider a nation. Nations are a product of modernity but it is likely to find ethnic elements that exist in these nations.

Since,"anarchy is what states make of it,” all states do not need to stress over their relative power and can focus on achieving long term peace.(Wendt, 79-80). While realist classical perspectives point to solely human nature and the anarchical system as the reason for conflict, Wendt provides an example showing that the self identities of states can lead to peace or conflict. He points to defining situations in context history that help determine a state 's interest. He states, “This seems to be happening today in the United States and the former Soviet Union. Without the cold war’s mutual attributions of threat and hostility to define their identities, these states seem unsure of what their ‘interests’

(Young 2014:19). In addition, this framework implies that sociocultural complexity is the striking feature of the state – or, at least, characterises social groups that are in the process of becoming one. In his paper, Possehl goes against this view by