Every day animals are taken into laboratories and companies to be tested for medications, cosmetics, and harsh cleaning chemicals to determine if they are safe for use. These tests cause long-lasting physical and mental harm--and often death, to each and every animal. Animal Testing should not be legal due to the costly, inaccurate test results it provides and the life-threatening effects it poses to animals. Many people who agree with animal testing, and wish to see it continue will say that animal testing gives way for medical growth in medications and provides the community with safe and tested medications. It is true that animal testing provides the population with testing medications, but when you test on animals for medicines that benefit humans, the results will most likely be skewed. Data shows that animal testing and studies fail to predict human outcomes in 50 to 99.7 percent of cases, making the testing not as reliable as stated (“About Animal Testing : Humane Society International”). …show more content…
Those who supervise and conduct the experiments may have faster results with more animals, but it is not necessarily cost effective. Animal testing is by-far more expensive than alternative methods scientists and labs could be using to reach their medical goals. The Humane Society International compared many methods of animal testing research with alternative non-animal ideas and experiments. It is stated, “An ‘unscheduled DNA synthesis’ animal test costs $32,000, while the in vitro alternative costs $11,000,” ("Animal Testing -
Can you imagine how much the world spend on animal tests? It is surely hard to be estimated. Only in America, the government spends about more than US$14.5 billion per year for carrying out all types of cruel experiments, results in the millions death of animals. By referring to the budget report provided by the National Institutes of Health in 2014, taxpayers in America had to pay more than $12 billion for undergoing animal tests which absolutely imposed a heavy financial burden on them. Another illustration mentioned on news articles include $9.6 million to inject drugs into rabbits’ brains to see whether it would cause any effects on eyes and $1.1 million to see if meth-addicted monkeys would choose food or drug in pursuit of satisfying the never-ending curiosity of the scientists.
Animal testing has always been a controversial and emotive topic. Each year, millions of innocent animals suffer and die in cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests, as well as in biology lessons, medical training exercises, and curiosity-driven medical experiments at universities (“PETA Makes Its Case Against Animal Testing” 3). Think of any drug, cosmetic or household cleaner. Chances are, at one time or another, an animal suffered in order to put that product on the shelf. As many as 800 animals are sometimes tested, experts note, before a drug is determined to be safe enough to proceed to a clinical trial (“Animal Testing” 2).
Animals are different than humans so they make poor test subjects and it is very difficult to create an animal model of human. Animals that are being tested are not protected by any Animal Welfare Act so that means that 95%
Animal testing has been used by scientists to test drugs and makeup products for many years. They have been kept in labs, poked, prodded at, observed, forced to inhale, eat, and wear substances that have killed them. Millions of animals have died each year because of this testing, and it needs to be stopped. Animal testing should not be continued because it is ineffective, it wastes lives, and is inhumane. Animal testing needs to be discontinued because it is ineffective.
Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.
Even though decades have passed, there are still people who argue that animal testing is essential to saving millions of human lives; not even realizing the lack of results, the high cost, and the immortality
To start off, I think animal testing is wrong. It may benefit OUR lives, but it doesn’t for the animals being tested on. It is cruel, inhumane, and sometimes isn’t necessary for the product. There are alternatives to this and it can cause much pain and suffering to the animals. In my opinion, animal testing is wrong and here are my reasons why I think so.
Animal Testing Should Be Banned Animal testing also known animal experimentation is a process whereby non-human animals are used to conduct experiments. There has been an increase of animal testing in the field of biomedical research. Due to this, animal testing has become an extreme controversial topic that has created a division among different groups, of those who are supporting the process and those who are opposing. Therefore, there are ongoing debates on whether animal testing should go on or it should be banned. Some groups argue it is ethical, while others insist that the process is unethical, and there is a last group advocating for alternatives in the testing other than the use of animals.
The inhumane act of testing products on virtuous and uninvolved animals needs to be recalled and eliminated. This belief has caused many disputes and debates for me. Animal testing has pros and cons such as any other controversial topic. This practice has granted science with many life-saving cures and treatments, but the use of animals for finding issues in products recently became unnecessary. New sciences and abilities of medicine around the world allow a different approach such as experimenting with human cells, rather a living organism.
Animals Testing Is animal testing necessary?. Should we ban expending animals in medical research or not?. More than 26 million animals are used in different countries like the United States and Canada. Animal testing may by defining as the use of animals in experiments and research that seeks to control the variable that impacts the behavior or biological system under study. Using large number of animals is mainly meant to find treatments and cure for certain diseases.
There are over 100 million animals in US labs that are poisoned, crippled, burned, and abused every year (“11 Facts About”). “...the number of animals used in tests increased along with the number of tests themselves. the rapid increase in animal testing led to the development of numerous agencies…” (Murnaghan). Scientists should stop using animals when testing. First of all animals and humans are similar to humans.
Each year in the United States, millions of animals are hurt or killed in the name of science by private institutions, household companies, cosmetics companies, government agencies, and scientific centers. These companies put these animals though harsh and inhumane conditions for testing. Medical testing should not harm the lives of many harmless animals because it is ineffective, irrelevant, and cruel. Animal testing is outdated and ineffective. In the article,”Stop animal testing - it's not just cruel, it's ineffective”, it reads,”There are safer alternatives to animal testing.
It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.
Corporations and businesses poison and kill animals for cosmetics, household products, and drugs just to obtain a profit and revenue. There currently is no legislation in the U.S. that necessitate that these materials be analyzed on animals, and there are many effective, humane testing methods available that could be used instead. There’s hardly any legal protection for animals who are used in experiments because the AWA, Animal Welfare Act, doesn't protect animals from being tested on. No experiment, no matter how painful or pointless to the animal, is against the law, and painkillers are not enforced. Because of the fact that animal testing or experimentation is dangerous, expensive, inhumane, possibly inaccurate, and there are other better
Over the years, alternative testing methods has evolved that replaces the need for animals in labs such as in vitro testing. Cell cultures are now being evaluated in petri dishes; producing more relevant results because human cells are being used rather than animal cells. Ninety-two percent of the drugs that are effective and safe for animals fail in human clinical trials because they either result in being too dangerous or they just don’t work (“Should Animals be Tested for Scientific or Commercial Testing?”). Not only does animal testing result in being cruel and inhumane, it also results in inaccurate results for humans. The Animal Welfare (AWA) act isn’t obeyed in many testings.