I would like to congratulate the Woodson Foundation, the schools district, and the NCPIE for attempting to address this problem in the Washington, D.C school district. This is a very important issue and need the upmost effort put forward.
This group is past the first stage which is forming stage, the purpose of the group has been established. In this respect the group should know this and not revisit the purpose of the task they agreed to take on. So I see the group being in the second stage which is storming stage. It was stated in the case study that there is different opinion about who should have the most control. Another point of disagreement is “Community organizer Mason Dupree doesn’t like the level of bureaucracy either. He
…show more content…
What I interpret from this is that if a less qualified union worker applies for a job then he/she could be employed over a more qualified non-union applicant. Being a union or non-union has nothing to do with operating with school board policies. The second problem I see is that the school board is worried that they might lose control over the new system. The Woodson Foundation needs to ensure they follow the school board policies. This should ease the school board concern over control. A minor problem is the complex bureaucratic structure. I believe this is a minor problem, because whenever working with any government agency their always will be a very large bureaucratic. It is not the task of the Woodson Foundation to change or create the bureaucratic, but to work within it. Finally, the school board is worried that this funding and jobs from this program will take away from other school district. This is a non-starter; it was stated that the funding would be private funding. So therefore, the school district can’t rob Peter to pay Paul, they should see this funding as a gift …show more content…
Many years ago we had what was called night school and every school district identified one school to conduct night school. The beauty of night school was that it was run by the school district therefore, it was certified and the kids received credit for class they attended. I’m not talking about Adult Learning Program; this is for the children attending high school. Security would still have to be provided for the same reasons that was previously mention. The kids would be responsible for their own transportation, which cuts down on costs. The size of classroom could be controlled. This is a win, win situation for everyone, I know because I went to night school in New York City and graduated in January, six months
The ACLU would most likely file a lawsuit against any version of this policy if passed because they will say that it violates the separation of church and state because some of the schools that will take students using vouchers provided by the government. A potential harm of this policy is that is it could make it more difficult for children in heavily isolated areas to receive these higher levels of education because it will be difficult for them to have access to a private school. Students in these portions of the state are more likely to be the ones who need public schools than students that live in urban areas. While they will still receive a better education than before, it might not reach the level of the education being received by those in private
In Chris Sweda’s article,”As CPS schools empty: Mayor Emanuel, don’t let this crisis go to waste”, he informs the audience how CPS schools are actually still in debt. Sweda validates how elementary schools are closing left and right in the chicago areas and that's including the school system being still in debt with teachers pensions. Mayor Rahm Emanuel doesn't want to mislead teachers, union leaders, and parents on the perception of how he believes educations is the most important key factor of keeping CPS schools running. Mayor Emanuel believes in downsizing classrooms to decrease the money of these half vacant CPS and move the students to better safer schools. It does not make sense in the eye of the Mayor to keep these low populated
But, I also can tell by reading the case study that there are quite a few sections in each mission that this community does provide for. Which means that there is a lot of responsibilities on whoever is over that specific section of the community. When I mean or talk about section I mean there are four specific section such as: The Elder Program, The Afterschool Program, The Day Care Program, and Music Program. In my opinion that is a lot of section for one community to be in charge over. Those are four big sections of these community which needs a lot of work to provide those three programs to run smoothly.
The Supreme Court case, Brown vs. Board of Education 349 U.S 294, dealt with the segregation of black children into “separate but equal schools.” The Brown vs. Board of Education was not the first case that dealt with the separating of the whites and blacks in schools. This case was actually made up of five separate cases heard in the United States Supreme court concerning the issue of segregation in public schools. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Briggs v. Elliot, Davis v. Board of Education of Prince Edward County (VA.), Boiling v. Sharpe, and Gebhart v. Ethel were the five cases that made up the Brown case. Thurgood, Marshall, and the National Association for the Advance of Colored People (NCAAP) handled these cases.
Current and future ECE educators will have more opportunities to work in these state run Pre-K programs, but what will happen to all the existing Pre-K programs. The biggest impact I see coming from Universal Pre-K is existing Pre-K Programs being closed or shutdown, displacing employees and breaking relationship build in communities. I think the best solution to this is to allow existing Pre-K Programs the opportunity to meet the new set of standards and criteria and allow them to remain open as a supplemental provider to the state operated Pre-K
This will allow many people who can’t afford college to have an opportunity to attend, without having to stress about falling in debt or dropping out simply because they couldn’t pay. In his book, Friedman states, “So a poorly funded and staffed high school today is a pathway to a dead end” (361). He continues by quoting Marc Tucker, “Therefore, we have to find a way to educate all of our young people to a very high standard. Otherwise, if you don’t upgrade their skills, the only way the low-skilled can compete is by driving down the wages” (quoted in Friedman 361).
This shows that they worked as a team with a specific objective of saving their friend. At the end, they all managed to save their lifes from Sid and their mission got accomplished. 4 stages of group Cycle- - Forming - Storming - Norming - Performing 1. Forming- This is the first stage of group formation.
“ Under the Obama administration, the federal government functioned as a giant octopus, bypassing families, communities, and states in order to reach its tentacles into the school curriculum, teacher evaluation, values conformity and even restroom policies.” ( Ashford 2017) Her idea is to let kids of different religions build their own schools or choose which schools they go too. The funding will be more evenly distributed giving disadvantaged kids the chance to learn. These disadvantaged kids will have the choice of what school they can attend too.
The Consolidation of Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education and The Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and the Implications on Brown v. Board of Education The Civil Rights Era is an important piece of the United States history. The movement was fueled by a push for equality amongst all, but particularly for those people of color. The landmark trial of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas led the way for a change in the understanding of what all men are created equal meant. The court decision in 1954 Brown trial was unanimous that segregation in public schools is inherently unequal.
This allows school districts with little or no money for building expansions to handle a growing student population and save millions of dollars in construction costs.” (Nair 2). Saving so much money could help schools afford better teaching equipment, which would most likely improve student grades. Next, a drawback is that it could be hard on families if the children have different school schedules. The change could make it difficult to plan a family vacation, go to summer camps,
“This approach is bad economic policy and bad education policy. An unprecedented federal spending increase for education will not improve economic growth -- and past experience strongly suggests that this plan will not improve American educational performance” (lips 2). Increasing school funding the wring way can cause the economy a lot of money and may lead to huge budget cuts or even jobs lost. There is a lot of public school across America that are underfunded so trying to fund them would cost a lot of money. Increasing school funding is very risky because if the graduation rates don’t go up when students get older they would face the problem of being in debt and won’t know how to pay it off .
The teenage crime rate has gone up effectively this past couple of years, although adding an 11pm curfew or even 10:30 pm curfew would help students. Many school-related activities don't
The students will be more organized since they are arranging their own schedules. They can learn how to disciplined themselves. The students could get their degree or finish his or her class faster.