Judiciary Essays

Malaysian judiciary refers to the Malaysian court system. It is an independent body separate from the legislative and executive arms of government. The role of courts is to ensure the law and order are followed, that justice is done, and criminals are punished. The head of the judiciary is the Chief Justice. The hierarchy of courts of Malaysia begins with the Magistrates’ Court, followed by the Sessions Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and finally is the Federal Court of Malaysia. There are generally

The legislature consists of federal and state parliaments that have the main purpose of creating legislation. The executive consists of the federal and state government that enforce and administer the laws created by the legislature. The Judiciary is made up of federal and state courts and have the role of resolving disputes. The three arms of government aim to effectively uphold the functions of law. These are social cohesion, the upholding of shared beliefs and values, and social progress, which

and that have been approved by the executive branch. Also, there was little concern that the judiciary might be able to overpower the political branches; since Congress controlled the flow of money and the President the military, courts did not have nearly the same influence from a constitutional design standpoint. The effects of this is that the president and congress do have some control over the judiciary branch with their power to appoint and confirm appointments of judges and justice. Congress

The role of the judiciary is to interpret the law, apply the law in different situation to achieve justice. Justice which is defined in a legal sense as “a scheme or system of law in which every person receives his/ her/its due from the system, including all rights, both natural and legal.” (Legal Dictionary). Justice can be achieved through various legal processes such as; police investigations and coronial inquests. Legal principles are instrumental in achieving justice such as; the rights of the

which has functioned autonomously and no one or any institutions are able to have power over these institutions. According to the doctrine of Separation of powers, it can be divided into three branches – the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary- where each branch has separable and independent powers from each other , therefore, one of the power of these three branches cannot

The checks and balances system in The United States of America is set up to avoid the "majority from ruling with an iron fist" (Mount, 2010). The three branches ,Legislative, Judicial, and Executive, were set up in the Constitution. The branches powers and limitations are also stated in the Constitution. While a particular branch might have specific jobs, there are limiting factors that also keep them from becoming too powerful. This slows the efficiency of decision making but that is a purposeful

doctrines of the constitution of the United Kingdom. The separation of powers is a doctrine often described as the trias politica principle and it involves the allocation of powers to the three branches, namely the legislature, the executive and the judiciary and how the function between them. In this essay I have to explain and critically analyse the doctrine of the separation of powers as it applies to the UK Constitution. Historically, the separation of powers is traced back in the ancient Greece

Separation of powers refers to the idea that the major body of a state should be functioned independently and that no individual of a state should have power separately. Therefore, separation of powers means that splitting up of responsibilities into different divisions to limit any one branch from expurgating the functions of another. The intention of the doctrine is to prevent the application of powers and provide for checks and balances of governing a state. It is a doctrine of constitutional

Separation of Powers as defined above is the doctrine contained in the Constitution that divides the US government into three branches, the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judiciary. Each of the branches has unique powers that were suited to them. Although each of the government has different tasks and functions, they all have the same power which is to check each other’s powers to secure the orderliness. But as we looked at the recent conducts of the government, there were activities that erode

would say separation of powers. These can keep separated by elections of who will be doing what for whom, the power each institution is given over the two and how they will be doing things different from each other. 2- The constitution of the judiciary department might be inexpedient to insist rigorously on the principal. The system of checks and balances is one of the big ones. This gives all 3 branches of government about the same power but over certain things. They are all ruled over

power having different responsibilities enables each arm of government to keep a check on the action of others. The Judiciary can strike down any laws being made by the legislature if they are unlawful, thus successfully providing a check on the legislature branch. Executive actions can also be deemed as unlawful by the judiciary. The legislature arm acts as a check on the judiciary as it can pass laws to override decisions made by the courts.

official to act was a win for the current administration because it kept more Federalists from gaining power in the judiciary system. Their overturning of Congress’s Judiciary Act of 1789 as unconstitutional was of more significance than their lack of action in commanding Madison to deliver letters. The Supreme Court overturning the Judiciary Act was caused by their realization that the judiciary branch should not have

courts as determined by Congress” (American Government).One strength of the judicial branch is the judicial review. “The Supreme Court justices base their decisions on legal analysis, precedents and authoritative source” in each case (The Federal Judiciary: Strengths and Weaknesses.). Overall, judicial branch have many strengths but one strength this branch does have is judicial review. B. One weakness of one of the three branches of government.

For thousands of years we have been fighting for our freedom in our nation and trying to make it “A more perfect union.”In the summer of 1787, 55 delegates met up in Philadelphia for a Constitutional Convention. These men had to make a new and improved constitution because they said the Articles of Confederation wasn’t working. They wanted a new constitution that would have a stronger central government that would hold our country together, but they feared that a new frame of tyranny would occur

limits of their powers. Regardless of how the American governance system may look, a closer look at this government reveals a more complex system of interactions and influences. The present paper explores the American government's three arms: the Judiciary, Executive, and Legislature. In this descriptive essay, the roles and responsibilities of all three components of government will be explored and analyzed. Besides, the report will also explore how the three branches interact with each other to uphold

Tyranny has been exhibited in many cruel ways. In the words of James Madison, tyranny can be defined as the accumulation of powers in the hands of one, a few or many. In 1787 our founding fathers gathered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to discuss the problem regarding the fact that The Articles of Confederation were not working. They were greatly challenged to create a document which not only provided a strong central government but also ensured that no person or people got a hold of too much power

represent the coercive power of government and their decisions allocate power among the branches of government, distribute wealth among individuals and corporations, and draw boundaries between personal freedom and governmental authority. Thus the judiciary is immensely important because it interprets the law when they decide cases, and the power to interpret the law is the power to make the law, especially in cases in -which there are very few and or no precedent cases to reference or guide them, (May

It is designed to be independent from the other branches of government, including the executive branch. This is because the framers of the Constitution believed that an independent judiciary was essential to protecting individual rights and upholding the rule of law. To ensure the independence of the judiciary, federal judges are appointed for life and can only be removed through the process of impeachment by Congress. The president has no power to remove federal judges from office. This helps

declare war, and troops can be deployed domestically in times of crisis or emergencies to enforce a federal judicial order. Some judicial powers of the presidency include the ability to grant pardons and the ability to appoint members of the federal judiciary, with senate approval. Under diplomatic powers, the President is the Head of State, receives ambassadors and any other public ministers, acknowledges whether a foreign government is legitimate or not, and can make treaties and executive agreements

The three branches were established by the Constitution and divided into executive, legislative, and judicial. The executive branch consists of the president and his cabinet, the legislative branch consists of Congress, the Senate, and the House of Representatives, and the judicial branch consists of the Supreme court and other federal courts. Focusing on the judicial branch, the Constitution has established the Supreme Court as the only court to make decisions of national importance. One strength