In David Dodds’, article Beautiful Teenage Brains (2011) he explains how teenagers are more willing to take risks than adults because unlike adults, they value reward more heavily. He provides evidence of researchers like psychologist Laurence Steinberg and his findings at Temple University. Where Steinberg observed adolescents and adults separately play a video game and recorded the difference in their actions with and without an audience. He also uses information obtained by Casey a neuroscientist at the Weill Cornel Medical College. The author's purpose for writing this article is so adults especially parents can gain some knowledge of what it is that’s going on in teenager’s brains to be more aware along with the teenagers themselves. …show more content…
His introduction starts off with comparing and contrasting teenagers and adults, not with an opinion of his own, but with words of Laurence Steinberg stating, “14-17-year olds are the biggest risk takers, although they reason their way through problems just as well as adult’s teens overestimate risk” (Dodds 1). He later moves on explaining why teens take more risk saying, “Teens take more risks not because they don’t understand the danger but because they weigh the risk versus rewards differently” (Dodds 1). The reason this happens is that unlike adults they value the outcome more so the rewards they get are more important to them than the danger. He talks about the experiment conducted by Steinberg where he has teenagers and adults play a video game that rewards you for taking a certain amount of risk but punishes you for taking too much (Dodds 1). Observing how these two groups acted without a crowd was the first step, then adding a crowd was the second step to try to understand the differences and what he found out was that, “teens would take twice as many risks when friends were watching but adults drove no differently” (Dodds 1). This is because teens want to feel “cool.” Finally, he ends with feedback from a neuroscientist at the Weill Cornel Medical College where she says teens can take the risk as far as
The article “ Inside the Teen Brain” by Marty Wolner, states that recent resherchers on the human brain provides parents with shocking evidence abou there teenager that probably explains there irational, ilogical, and impulsive behavior. As it turns out, brain developement during the teenage years is radically more active than previously thought. Even though the brain is almost matured the grey matter in the thinking part of the brain is still making connections. The information proccesed in the limbic system, without benefit of higher level processing in the pre-frontal cortex may result in impulsive, egocentric,, and even risky behavior. Because of the construction of the teenage brain is that its not capable of fully processing information
This passage really stood out to me because it is a fond and genuine moment between two characters that often come across as lost and are exploited incessantly by Russell. The story that Suzanne retells is humorous and preposterous, revealing the personality and the carefree attitude that any ordinary teen should possess. You can see a real warmth and friendship between the two girls, as an episode of something close to normality briefly suspends itself in their portfolio of otherwise offbeat experiences. Instead of running towards crazed situations charged with danger and immorality, the two are simply content with just being typical girls, enjoying each other's company with sunny
“The Empirical Kids” By David Brooks In 2013 David Brooks wrote a piece for the Opinion Page of The New York Times. The piece provoked responses that were both positive and negative to his argument. Interestingly, the crux of his argument is taken from a student he taught at Yale University named Victoria Buhler. Buhler’s analysis came from an assignment for Brooks’ Yale taught class that looked into Brook’s 2001 piece for The Atlantic called “The Organizational Kid”. This is important to note as it sheds light on how Buhler came to the conclusions she did.
Utilizing all three rhetorical devices including ethos, logos, and pathos, helped Alexie build a powerfully persuasive argument. I feel the combination of the three devices proved Alexie’s article was valid, credible, logical, and reasonable; yet emotional. As the reader, my attention stayed through the essay. I wanted to know what happened next and how his story ended. I also agree with Alexie’s argument that by reading and through hard work you can save your life.
Comedian Jon Stewart states “The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom”. In the chapter “Public Thinking” from the book Smarter Than You Think, Clive Thompson addresses the topic of modern day technology, and argues that the internet is an effective and useful tool which positively impacts the way people think. Thompson is a contributing writer for The New York Times and Wired Magazine, as well as author of the book Smarter Than You Think with degrees in Political Science and English. He supports this claim by referring to Ory Okolloh, a law student and blogger about Kenyan politics and corruption, and describing her positive experience with the internet. He then refers to the “audience effect” which can clarify the mind and change one’s performance.
Since Steinberg studies the brain and creates this visual, the reader is persuaded that he is accurate, and therefore believes neurology is an effective answer. The expert’s piece is concluded with the idea that we do not know what to do about teens. Steinberg finishes by saying “there is a high probability of something bad happening”, when teens congregate (Steinberg 5). It shows the world is still unsure of what to do
The Teen Brain The excerpt from “The Teen Brain:Still Under Construction” by NIMH, the author believes the teen brain is still developing hormonal,intellectually, and emotionally which affects teen behavior. To begin, the teen brain has growing hormones which affects their impulsive behavior. Huge horomonal changes play a factor in a teens social life and behavior. “ As with reproductive hormones, stress hormones can have complex effects on the brain, and as a result,behavior.”
“Free-Range Kids,” offers the controversial perspective of the ‘free-range’ parenting philosophy, telling readers that “children deserve parents who love them, teach them, trust them—and then let go of the handlebars”. Similarly, the speech given by Julie Lythcott-Haim, “How to raise successful kids without over-parenting” offers the perspective directly opposing the belief that “kids can’t be successful unless parents are protecting and preventing at every turn”. The two texts offer similar perspectives, but utilise different generic conventions. Skenazy utilizes persuasive techniques such as anecdotal evidence, statistics and expert opinion to endorse the ‘free-range’ technique and add a level of validity. She uses satire to criticise parents,
Teenagers act in irrational, impulsive and hazardous ways. This is due to their brains being underdeveloped and can’t form important connections, in fact a person's brain doesn't mature until their early 20’s. Teens also tend to put themselves at risk more than adults and misinterpret situations. Romeo and Juliet are an excellent example of the teen brain. Teens impulsive actions typically can be reckless for themselves and others.
After examining Dr. Carol S. Dweck’s article, “The Secret to Raising Smart Kids,” we can see that she makes a compelling argument for her Scientific American audience through the use of key rhetorical strategies. The first technique she employs involves strong organizational structure. To start her piece Dweck begins with an anecdotal story of a student picturing the changes of his mind-set throughout his school years. In Describing jonathan story, she explains, “A brilliant student, Jonathan sailed through grade school [...] In the seventh grade, Jonathan suddenly lost interest in school, refusing to do homework or study for tests.
Was Chris fully aware of the risks he took? There are a substantial amount of risky activities that teens engage in. Some activities include skipping class, speeding, and even drinking and smoking. It is evident, however, that teens engage in these activities due to the fact that they are not aware of the risks that come afterwards.
Rita Pierson, an educator of 40 years, as was her parents were as well as her grandparents. She appeals to educators on the issue of creating relationships with students, rather than just teaching a lesson she embraces each individual as a concerned educator. Being in a room full of educators means that she has to appeal to them in a way they want to learn. She does this by using powerful anecdotes to engage the audience. In the speech Every Kid Needs a Champion by Rita Pierson, she speaks to introduce, convince, and persuade educators that they should form relationships with their students due to higher academic achievement as well as self-esteem; she continues to use many rhetorical devices including soaps, ethos, pathos, and logos to achieve her argument.
While it’s true some millennials drive like race car drivers on their way to school, the general public’s fear of young drivers tends to overshadow the dangers presented by drivers on the other end of the age spectrum. II. Credibility Statement: As a young child, I loved to ride in the car with my grandfather. However,
For many teenagers in our world today, playing video games may be a huge part of their daily lives. In contrast, many individuals think playing violent video games will not be safe for kids. However, research has shown that video games have solved some of science’s biggest problems. Teens could someday cure diseases. Also, kids who play violent games are being “exposed” to what war may be really like.
Children around the world play adult content video game And many parents say it is bad for their children; however video games can actually help their children learn. Approximately 90% of children in the United States play video games, and more than 90% of those games involve mature content that often includes violence (Park, 2014). There are those that believe video games are detrimental to society, however playing video games including those with mature content can actually be beneficial to both individuals and society by increasing knowledge expanding the ability to react positively at real life situations and improving cognitive thinking skills. Children that play video games not only have the potential to increase their ability to learn right from wrong, and to improve their cognitive thinking skills the game can also increase a child’s knowledge.