Alyssa Tharp Research Paper

On December 10th, 2015, Phoebe Maltz Bovy published her article, “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” , on the progressive New Republic website. This article was published eight days after the San Bernardino attack of December 2nd, 2015. This article explores why the United States of America should ban every gun in the country.

name is Alyssa Loredo, I was born and raised in Odessa, Texas. I have moved around frequently, but I have not yet to move out of Odessa. And who am I? That's an Interesting question, but overall I would describe myself as Devoted, Ambitious, and a Perfectionist when I need to be. There are many stories I could tell you about how I became the person I am today, but none of those stories made the most amount of impact in my life as the one I'm about to tell you.

These two ads show that there are various aspects of rhetoric that can be used to convey the same message of gun sense. Even though various aspects of rhetoric vary in their effectiveness in each advertisement, both organizations were able to convey their call for more gun

The article states, “Gun control deters violent crime as well as the death penalty” (Hunter). The author uses logos here to point out that gun control is an ineffective as the death penalty when it comes to preventing violence. This supports his argument against strict gun control because, according to Hunter, many Liberals claim to oppose the death penalty because it does little to prevent future crime, yet Liberals are for strict gun control. However, strict gun control isn’t going to prevent criminals from committing crimes, because criminals do not follow the law

Even though gun violence has always plagued humanity, authorities still fail to remove the dangerous equipment at hand. Of course, in the article “The solution to gun violence is clear” published in December 12, 2012, issue of The Washington post, opinionated writer Fareed Zakaria makes his claim on why guns should be banned in the United States. Although this is an interesting subject Zakaria is not very authoritative on his claim. He argues that there are too many guns, too easy to obtain, and the country’s “permissive laws” are making it worst for Americans. Zakaria writes about how much of a better difference the lack of access to guns, have in other countries to make his point.

Gender, race, and region clearly influence the issue of gun control. In relation to gun ownership, men are five times more likely than women to own guns (Gallup). Moreover, in a survey where participants were asked whether it is more important to support the protection of gun rights or gun control, men support gun rights at a rate of 57% while women do so at 37% (Pew Research Center). Having established that gun rights are more associated with males, there is also a differentiation between race and region. 50% of white men own guns whereas only 34% of non-white men do, and white southern men are the most likely to own a gun at 61% (Gallup).

Proponents of more gun control laws believe that the Second Amendment was intended exclusively for militias, that gun restrictions have always existed, and that gun regulations would prevent criminals from possessing firearms. However, Opponents claim that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns, that guns are needed for self-defense, and that gun ownership helps to dissuade crime. Because of this obvious difference, proponents of stricter firearm regulation demand more laws to help prevent mass shooting, and want reform in the area of background checks. Meanwhile, opponents of gun laws often accuse the proponents of manipulating a mass tragedy in order to further strengthen their fight. Gun ownership has been a tradition within the united states since before the country itself was formed.

Application of Conflict Theory to the Gun Control Debate Being a debate, the conflict theory is a very applicable theory that can be applied to guns/gun control laws and their roles in society. A debate is something that is associated with conflict, so by observing how deep and exactly in what directions this conflict extends, one might be able to understand this topic in a new light. In other words, by analyzing the very nature of this argument, this sociological perspective can be used to generate a deepened understanding of the debate on the extent of gun control laws. The Conflict Theory

Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. Many believe this, but columnist Nicholas Kristof, author of “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” published in 2014 in the New York Times, disagrees. A rhetorical analysis should consist of: logos, pathos, and ethos. Kristof’s use of logos is strong due to the amount of facts and statistics he offers to his audience, but he fails to strongly use pathos and ethos, due to the lack of these elements Kristof’s argument is weakened.

Gun Control: Identifying Its Opposition And Feasible Solutions The discrepancy between opposing opinions among United States citizens’ views on gun control is a large problem that has faced the nation for several years. Due to recent tragedies related to the issue, many Americans have responded in outrage, demanding more rigorous laws related to firearm control; Others believe it would only be harmful to enact stricter gun laws, under the idea that it would present a lack of self-defense. This essay will review the pros and cons of the opposing views surrounding the controversy, and analyze the individual aspects of both opinions, while discussing possible resolutions to the issue.

A challenging aspect in today’s society is the need to address stronger gun control possibilities. New gun control bills could easily be placed in the ballots, but questioning the ability to have long term affects if much different. Many gun owners are set in old ways and never want to see changes that could affect their way of life. Just like many of the members of the National Rifle Association that believe back ground checks are enough and it should stay that way. Another viewpoint, people believe background checks are insufficient and the government should broaden ways to further secure weapons.

Gun control has been the subject of many debates for many years now. Some human beings want to tighten gun registration and license while others demand their 2nd amendment right to be recognized and protected without restriction. Seeing how legally prohibit guns seems almost impossible, people are trying to find a neutral ground. Today in the U.S., Americans have many different opinions about gun control, how it should be handled and what action that needs to be taken. There are many Americans who questions the use of guns themselves and not the person that’s actually pulling the trigger.

In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.

PERSUASIVE SPEECH Choong Hwan Park Speech 101 Attention Getter: using the video that shows gun violence for 15 seconds. Thesis: In order to solve gun violence, only government officers such as police, firemen, or soldiers should be able to possess guns and civilians should not be able to own guns for any reason. Credibility: Since I was a little kid, I watched a lot of news that was related to gun violence in the U.S. Now that I am living in the United States, I sometimes feel that I am not safe when I take the subway or walk the streets at night.

“Just in 2018 there has been 18 school shootings, on average per week” (snopes:How many school shootings have taken place so far in 2018). The incidents that have occurred have been a big impact in people 's lives. Yet no one with power has spoken about the problems regarding the recent shooting. See, there are two main sides of gun control, the side that agrees and the side that doesn’t. People who agree believe that no one should be able to own a gun, or that there should simply be stricter gun control laws.