American Pageants Massacre Research Paper

Colonist Perspective On the evening of March 5, 1770, five innocent civilians were brutally murdered in the streets of Boston at the hands of corrupt British Red Coats. Our brothers and sisters, we peacefully protesting the corrupt, British imposed taxation without our representation. Among those whose lives were taken was Crispus Attucks, a former Black slave. The brutality expressed by the British is foreshadowing for more restrictions and intervention to come. The only way we can defeat British corruption is by coming together as one under this pertinent cause.

In his commentary, Crisis No. 1, Thomas Paine argues that the colonists shall continue fighting for their freedom from the British. Paine supports this argument by describing the issues that the colonists have with the British. Paine’s purpose is to persuade in order to encourage the soldiers to keep fighting. The use of a formal tone with his audience, shows the significance of the situation. To help him urge the soldiers to keep fighting, he appeals to the soldier’s pathos, or the characteristic that affects emotions, he uses strong rhetorical techniques and figurative language.

To begin, so many colonists died from disease and warship. In the text in (Document D) it states, “Some harshe and crewell dealings by cutting off towe (two) of the salvages heads and other extremities.” It contributes to why so many people die because this caused death. They were being murdered and that is two people that are dead and many more have died from the other ways they decided to kill them. Indians killed 50 Powhatan’s siege of

Was the Boston Massacre Really a Massacre? One of the most common things talked about in the history of the U.S.A. is the Boston Massacre, but was this historical event commonly looked at as a massacre really a massacre. I believe that the Boston Massacre was not a massacre at all instead it was just the act of self defense of a few british soldiers that were being attacked by upset colonists. One of the most said things about the Boston Massacre is that the british soldiers fired into a crowd of innocent people, but there is many pieces of proof that says otherwise.

The colonists had every reason to resent the guard. This guard, amongst others, had been sent from England to patrol the streets. The standing army that the king has sent to protect us has done nothing except instill fear. Within a few moments more people began throwing things

If Preston had given the orders to his soldiers to open fire, he would not have scolded them for their shocking actions. By putting their guns up, he was letting them know that he did not give those orders and that they should not repeat such actions. After the shooting occurred another eye witness, Thomas Peck, had spoken with Preston. Peck questioned the captain on what he thought he had done. According to Peck, Mr. Preston answered that he had nothing to do with the bitter actions of his men that they did it with their own will.

In The Things They Carried, by Tim O’Brien, Tim uses a series of war stories to explain what it was like for him and his fellow soldiers in the Vietnam War. While many seem factually untrue, he describes a True war story as one that makes you feel the same emotions and feelings the soldiers had, opposed to true war stories that tell of what actually happened. He explains how the teller “wanted to heat up the truth, to make it burn so hot that you would feel exactly what he felt… facts were formed by sensation, not the other way around…” (O’Brien 89). The stories were made up based off how they felt experiencing it. One specific story, “Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong,” recounts the story of a soldier bringing over his girlfriend and the transformation she goes through as she spends time in the jungle.

The Battle of New Orleans The Battle of New Orleans was a significant time in history. It was supposed to end the war but it did nothing even close to that. The battle just made things worse if you really think about it. The battle was a lot worse than you think. 2,000 men were killed and 58 wounded or missing.

When the shooting ended, several people were dead and more were wounded. ”(Document C). With no freedoms, the colonists felt caged

The war the colonists had been fighting against Britain has gone to a slow; they were waiting for winter to be over to fight in the warm rays of the sun in summer. They stayed in a camp in called,”Valley Forge” Most soldiers left because of the bad treating and don’t know what to do. The ones that stayed got sick or died. Quitting Valley Forge for most wasn’t much of a thought of leaving or staying. Most left because of sickness and death that swept throughout the camp of valley forge.

On the evening of March,5 1770, a small group of boys taunted a British sentry in front of the Bost Custom House. After enough torment the soldiers struck one of them with a musket and immediately after, a group of 60 people gathered around prompting the soldier to get help. Captain Thomas Preston and seven soldiers hurried to protect the sentry. Efforts to calm the crowd failed and when the crowd surrounded the crew retreat was impossible. One of the crew fired and the rest followed on what seemed to be a direct order from Preston leaving five dead and six injured.

The book also quotes “ Kill them! The officer yelled. He charged through the door waving his sword.” This quote shows that the British did not care about the Colonists. They just wanted to win and

On March 5, 1770, British soldiers fired into a crowd on King’s Street in Boston. Five people died and the soldiers were charged with murder. The events of the Boston Massacre made the colonies hunger for independence even stronger, however I believe that the soldiers are not guilty of committing murder. I will prove through historical accounts and eyewitness testimony that the British Soldiers are indeed not guilty of murder, but were acting purely out of self-defense. William Sawyer, a Boston citizen, gave this account of the incident during the trial, “The people kept huzzaing.

Rosewood Massacre: A Race Riot In America In the first week of January in 1923 a racially motivated riot occurred int he small town of Rosewood, Florida. This riot escalated into a violent massacre that slaughtered many African Americans as well as Caucasians and lead to the demise of the entire town that had been established. This event became to be known as one several race riots that occurred in the United States of America during the early twentieth century. The events prior to the Rosewood Massacre, including the origins of the town, the massacre itself and the issues and events that were sub sequential to this catastrophic event all played a major role in the history of African Americans.

This demonstrates how harsh was king George III with the colonists. The King punched colonists in the face every time he had the chance. He was also bugging them by not putting attention to their petitions and requests of a friendly peace. This war had all the reasons to be a war of self-defense, they were tired of trying to make someone happy that hurted them. King George III did not had any right to punish or treat them that way, which is why colonists felt oppressed by the government and saw the injustice which is why this war can be justified as a self-defense war.