Ap Euro Dbq On Napoleon Bonaparte

Napoleon dominated the European battlefields during his pre-1809 reign as France’s emperor. The French military genius overwhelmed inferior military opponents with innovative maneuvers of mass armies, total war supported with French nationalism, and rapid decisive military victories. Following 1809, Napoleon’s military successes faded as he stubbornly applied French Revolution-era military strategies against present enemy forces of equal strength and tactical adeptness.

Napoleon’s 1812 invasion of Russia offers significant lessons for all levels of war. Prior to France’s 1812 march into the Russian frontier, the French Emperor experienced years of decisive victories, across numerous battlefields. Russia was not victorious in 1812 due to phenomenal planning, brilliant tactical execution, frigid weather, or Russian nationlism. Instead, Russia won the war because of Napoleon’s mistakes at tactical, operational, and the strategic levels. Napoleon lost the 1812 campaign due to his distorted view of the strategic environment and underestimating his own limitations and the capabilites of Russia and Tsar Alexander.

Napoleon Bonaparte was the emperor of France after the French revolution. He was a great leader, but also might be considered a dictator of sorts. After the revolution Napoleon was said to have brought peace to the people of France in a time of distress. When Napoleon was leader he ended up both upholding and undermining the ideals and goals of the French revolution. Napoleon upheld the revolution by creating equality for all men, and by making a meritocracy, but he also undermined it by taking away most if not all of the women's rights, and taking away freedom of the press.

Q7. After the aftermath of the 1848 uprisings a new strong ruler stepped forward. France's newest Emperor was Louis-Napoleon. This was somewhat a familiar name to most if not all of the French people. Louis-Napoleon happened to be the nephew of France's long reigning man of destiny, Napoleon Bonaparte.

Napoleon Bonaparte was a ruthless dictator who rose and fell during the turbulent French Revolution because of his singular combination of ego, toxic masculinity, and authoritarian methods. He was first hailed as a military genius for his victories, but his fortunes changed when he lost battles while defending the very nation he had fought to rule. After attending military academies and rising through the ranks to finally hold the prestigious title of General, Bonaparte developed an unquenchable craving for power. But eventually, his stratospheric ascent and unavoidable collapse resulted from his unbridled ambition, his bloated ego, the continuation of toxic masculinity, and totalitarian leadership. Napoleon possessed one of the most notorious egos in the world.

Although Napoleon was considered of as a bad ruler for losing some battles along the way, he proves to be a good ruler because he created an army that won many battles, he had very good military tactics, and he uses the idea of democratic despotism to help compromise with the people about their power. First, Napoleon won many battles along the way while using his great military tactics. His first battle that he won was in the French port of Toulon. Then he won some battles against the Austrians which gave him most of northern Italy.

Imagine being alive in a time when more than 40,000 people were beheaded in the name of freedom. That's exactly what happened in the early stages of the French revolution. The French Revolution was a period of drastic social and political change in France and is thought to have been carried forward in the later years by one man, Napoleon Bonaparte. Much controversy surrounds this idea, many say he betrayed the revolution, some say he saved it, and others say the revolution ended before Napoleon's rule even began. The truth is Napoleon Bonaparte was a young man who wished to fulfill the ideals of the revolution at the beginning, with those ideals being equality, liberty, and fraternity in simple terms.

France was very different before Napoleon came along. Before Napoleon France was controlled by an absolute monarchy. France was also under the old regime which was a system that existed in most of Europe at that time. Also all laws were created by the Legislative assembly. Based upon historical documents and his own words Napoleon Bonaparte had a negative impact on France.

Napoleon first came to power after taking part in a coup and setting up a government where he held absolute power. He ruled France as an emperor for many years, until he failed to conquer Great Britain, which sparked the downfall of his reign. Throughout his rule, he set up reforms, and expanded French territory, but his defeat brings up the question of whether or not he was successful or not as a ruler of France. After analyzing the two essays both in support and against this claim, one should see that Napoleon was successful as a ruler because of his commitment to French reforms, his influence over the people of France, and because of the significant amount of military achievements during his reign.

Palina Hornaya Chapters 9 and 10: The French Revolution and Napoleonic Europe Theme: France, although it was one of the most advanced countries in Europe, quickly fell due to the Enlightenment ideas and people’s critical perspective of their government and society. When Napoleon Bonaparte came to power, he ended the revolution through reforms, and created a French Empire. His political unity and great military skills led to more modern and enlightened reforms in Europe. Subtheme: BACKGROUNDS 1.

REFORMED FRANCE AND EUROPE: THE INFLUENCE OF NAPOLEON BONAPARTE Napoleon Bonaparte, a French military leader, was a powerful personality that emerged after the French Revolution erupted in 1789. It was during this time of European chaos when he rose into military leadership and seized political power in France in an event known as the coup of 18 Brumaire (___). It was in 1804 when he crowned himself emperor and expanded his empire by waging wars across Europe that led to massive bloodshed. Though his leadership may be described as filled with contradicting philosophical and political objectives, we can attribute to him significant modern-day government systems. This paper focuses on exploring the several reforms that Napoleon implemented, and how the reform reshaped France and the whole of European continent.

Another way Caesar and napoleon can be compared was their political mind. Caesar as well as Napoleon were both able to achieve vast political power as a result of being very politically savvy. Both realized that in order to take complete control of the government, you must have the support of the army which they had as a result of being generals. With the support of the army both future dictators enacted coup de tats. In the case of Caesar, after being fired from his position of governor of Gaul(modern day France), took the army which had been loyal to him, entered the Roman Senate building and took control of the Roman Republic.

People that were more poor, got a chance to earn more money. Another enlightenment idea that he supported was education and art, and he built free public schools so all children were able to get educated. Some might argue that he crowned himself king and his brother King of Spain, which means that he did not get rid of the monarchy even though that was one of the main ideas during Enlightenment. But Napoleon had plebiscites, people that were allowed to vote, and

In 1799, Napoleon overthrew the current government and became First Consul which is the highest-ranking position in the French government. While in this position he continued to lead his army to many more victories. In 1804, Napoleon declared himself the Emperor of France as he continued to expand his now French empire. During his reign, Napoleon had near complete control of the government and military. He was able to make decisions as well as pass laws without any outside approval.

He ensured that all citizens would be equal under his reign, which, while the promise was not kept, initially gained him the support of the lower class. The lower class saw Napoleon as a leader who truly worked for the benefit of the people. Napoleon even reconnected France with the Catholic Church, for France was primarily Catholic, along with the majority of the rest of Europe, which showed how he wanted to restore this relationship in order for the welfare of the people. While people saw this as a reunification of church and state, this was just another way Napoleon consolidated his power, by gaining the support of Catholics.