Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

The Federalists supported the constitution, and wanted more power to the central government. The Federalists pushed for the constitution because it would give them more power, mainly because they were the government officials, in the central government. Opposed to the constitution were the Anti-Federalists, who wanted the Bill Of Rights not the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists believed the Senate would be too powerful and they (the others/ Anti-Federalists) would be oppressed. The Anti-Federalists wanted the same power as the Federalists, and those in the government.

The Federalists were essentially the founding party (the original alternative were the anti-Federalists). They

Federalists were persons of the U.S citizens of the United States who had believed that the constitution of the U.S was good how it was. Federalists wanted a strong centralized government. “A pure democracy can admit no cure for the

The Federalists were a group of people that wanted a national government to be all as one instead of states having their own government. The anti-federalists were the ones that disagreed with having a national government. They thought that the select state should have power over itself in everything they did. The Federalist Party was an important part of

The Federalists thought that if the constitution did not specifically say the government couldn't do something than they could do it. Their theory was that this would make the government strong, which would lead to a powerful and influential nation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans believed that if the constitution did not specifically state that the government could do something they could not do it. They were afraid that if the

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views about the U.S. Constitution and how the government should have been organized. While the Federalists sought after a stronger national government and wanted to ratify the Constitution “as is”; the Anti-Federalists favored a stronger state government and a weaker national government. When the U.S. Constitution was presented to the Anti-Federalists, they were not necessarily against the U.S. Constitution, however, they wanted to incorporate a couple of additions to ensure that the national government would not gain too much power over the people. Due to the discourse between the two, they came up with a compromise and added the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. The Bill of Rights was

They also believed that, the large republic politics would act like a filter and it will be able to select skilled and talented leaders. They were confident that the federal system would act like a firewall and it will help to isolate factions within the individual states and preventing from spreading their negative agendas to other states (p. 149). The federalists supported a strong central government and opposed Bill of Rights unnecessary and harmful to liberty. The Antifederalists opposed strong central government and believed Bill of Rights are necessary to protect liberty. The Federalists didn’t like militia and preferred Federal standing army

Federalists were the ones for the rich and against the British rule. The Federalists party is not around anymore, because it was dismissed in the year 1824. Which turned into the Democratic Party. The Federalists and Republicans had many differences in their plan, one was for rich and the other is for the poor. If they joined together they would make America better, but unfortunately they did not.

AAS Political Science Unit 4 Assignment The Federalist Party Led by John Adams , Alexander hamilton, and john Marshall. Formed from the group that fought for a stronger Federal government before the ratification of the constitution. • Our first 2 president George Washington and John Adams were Federalists • Associated mostly with the rich and fought for industry rather than farming • Had a stronger alliance with Britain over France • Were is favor of a more central government than individual states The party split during the War of 1812.

That’s a huge difference between these two parties except they both created systems in order to ensure the government couldn’t possess too much power. The federalists created checks and balances which split the powers of the government equally therefore no one party had too much overbearing powers. Federalists created this to ensure the government couldn’t become tyrannous. On the other hand the Anti-Federalists fought for a bill of rights therefore ensuring their rights couldn’t be robbed by a tyrannous government. Both sides were scared to trust a government after the strict British rule while one was more willing to make a new government than the other.

The main difference between federalists and antifederalists is the control of the federal government. The federalists wanted more control to the national government and the antifederalists wanted each state to have their own laws and government. The federalists wanted a strong federal government because they wanted tall the states to come together as one. They wanted the constitution to be what brought them together and thought that having a strong national government would help this.

One of the greatest conflicts between federalists and anti-federalists is the lack of Bill of Rights in order to hold limitation of power to the government. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton. The federalists were the first political party of the United States government. Federalists agree with the Constitution, and worked to convince the States to ratify it. The group of essays, known as the Federalist Papers were created in aid to gain encouragement of ratification by Alexander Hamilton as well as James Madison.

For many people, we don’t really talk about this topic often, or at all depending on the person, so none of us really know the difference(s) between the two. Federalists believe that all power is controlled by the national government. They prefer that a single person lead the executive branch and they believed that the Constitution didn’t need the Bill of Rights. However, they are in the wrong. In my opinion, the anti-federalists aren’t as strong-minded as the federalists would be in the government, they would have better control in the direction they wanted their government to go: either have a tyrant rule and control the entire United States, or let the people have a say in what they want in a government and have the government actually take

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.