Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Martin Luther King Jr

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr's techniques are very different, but similar. They both want the same thing: negro companies. The way they carry out this, though, is different. Malcolm wants to make his own negro company. Furthermore, Martin wants to protest peacefully by banning products from companies that do not hire negroes.

He preached a lot about black superiority, unlike Martin Luther King Jr who wanted to have a peaceful protest on the other hand Malcolm acknowledge that we should use force if necessary to protect themselves. His faith was challenged when he found out that Elijah Muhammad had seduced several women while in Islam four of them having his children. In 1964 Malcolm renounced Elijah an left the nation of Islam. He founded a

Notoriously, Martin Luther King Jr. has been the name of the civil rights movement, the one we all look up to in terms of the end of segregation. But, this respectable man was not the only one to take action in the name of equality, as another infamous speaker, Malcolm X, also drove the civil rights movement in a way of ferociousness and rage. This man, the head of the Black Nationalist movement, gave phenomenal speeches that indirectly propelled the civil rights movement, including Prospects For Freedom, By Any Means Necessary, and Message to the Grassroots. Malcolm X was a man who was an illustrious black nationalist, and was the speaker for the Nation of Islam. He often preached controversial things that regularly contrasted him with Dr.

It was during Prison that Malcolm had an experience that he described was as if Allah had given him a gift to be able to reflect and convert to Islam and change his ways (Perry, 1991). Malcom soon joined the Nation of Islam and upon being released from prison preached a philosophy that was incredibly radical for the time. The nation of Islam and Malcolm preached an over zealous stance on racial division and particularly black superiority, in order to combat the harsh reality of racism in white America. The nation of Islam proclaimed that the white race was born of devils, and obviously caused immense controversy and threat from opposition. Malcolm did so much for the construction of modern black American collective identity and fought hard for civil rights that changed the course of history.

Two of the most significant individuals are Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. During the American civil rights movement. Although the two leaders had distinct ways of combating structural racism and injustice, King's theory ultimately prevails over Malcolm X's. The references discussed why King's perspective is superior to Malcolm X's, especially in terms of bringing about long-lasting change. The two leaders' approaches to nonviolence were one of their most significant distinctions.

Malcolm X believed violence was necessary for protecting yourself. He also wanted African-Americans to have the same rights as whites, but they wanted to maintain separation. King and Malcolm's viewpoints were both coherent. First, Martin Luther had a philosophy that America should be integrated.

After his release, Malcolm X visited Elijah Muhammad's mosque in Harlem and became the most successful missionary of the radical Muslim preacher. He saw himself as chosen by God to unify the Blacks in North America and free them from the yoke of the whites. Through his charismatic, rhetorically brilliant speeches, Malcolm X enthused his audience. In his speeches he demanded economic independence and an autonomous state for the blacks.

in the 1950s through the 1960s, there was social and political injustice. There was also racism, but leaders such as Dr. King and Malcome X were both heroes in the civil rights movement. Malcolm X is the leader whose methods and messages work the best. Malcolm X was a civil rights leader that was good at his job and took it very seriously; he did not like to play games and was straight to the point. In paragraph one, Malcolm X states, " I'm not here to discuss anything we differ about because it time for us to submerge our differences.

Assess the short term significance of Malcolm X in advancing civil rights for African Americans between the years 1952-1965 Malcolm X joined the Nation of Islam in 1952, it is in this organization where Malcolm X quickly rose to be seen as a leading civil rights activist for African Americans between the years 1952 – 1965. It has been argued Malcolm X used this position to advance civil rights for African Americans through his ability to communicate new unconventional ideas and be the independent voice of African Americans. As well as his unique leadership style which united African Americans together; Sources 1 and 2 support this view as they show how Malcolm X was determined to speak his views as well as uniting the black community. On the

People were desperate for change using any means necessary, violence included. African Americans felt like they had no voice, so they resorted to violence even if they didn’t have anyone to lead them. Malcolm X was eventually the leader that many African Americans looked up to in order to guide and be the voice they felt they never had. He was able to unify African Americans through their need for violence in place of their voice. On the other hand, King’s approach would be best in the present time.

While King’s non-aggressive civil rights movement was extremely structured and led by organized protests, Malcolm X’s aggressive civil rights movement was less formally organized but many participants were influenced by his strong rhetoric. Malcolm X believed that his goals should be accomplished by any means possible, even if it meant that African-Americans needed to employ aggressive tactics in order to protect themselves. Malcolm X, who converted to the Nation of Islam while in prison during the late 1940s, worked with the nation’s leader Elijah Muhammad. Malcolm X’s conversion was one of the main things that differentiated him from Martin Luther King; while King preached Christian messages, often involving peace and love, Malcolm X preached Islamic messages, often involving justice and respect. Malcolm X believed that African-Americans were never going to get what they wanted by working with white society; he believed that African-Americans had to work alone.

Malcolm X began his speech by urging African Americans to submerge their differences and realize that they all have a common problem - political oppression, economic exploitation, and social degradation at the hands of the white man. Malcolm X was one of the most dynamic, dramatic and influential figures of the civil rights era. He was an apostle of black nationalism, self respect, and uncompromising resistance to white oppression. Malcolm X was a polarizing figure who both energized and divided African Americans, while frightening and alienating many whites.

Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.

The men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so

Malcolm’s speeches acted more as instruments of provocation than conversion. Unlike Martin Luther King Jr.’s campaign, Malcolm’s campaign around the country was a direct assault and it was difficult to see any oppressor that will tolerate such. This obviously accounted for the many police brutalities, imprisonment and deaths among the black race. Malcolm X symbolized black dominance and self-respect, he was one of the greatest forces that shaped the current understanding and interpretation given to conflict and violence in the world politics today. If Malcolm were to live in this era, he would be labeled as a terrorist (http://malcolmx.com/).