Compare And Contrast The Giver And Society

Justin Rojas ElA- Essay #1 Mr. perino Due 03-07-23 How do society rules help us or hurt us Society rules can help us in many ways. The rules that we are following till this day keep us alive or being safe. These rules show us how we are supposed to act during a situation.

The novels Code Talker and The Giver contain main characters that have a share in their similarities and differences. At a glance we see the characters as different in every way possible, but when you look deeper and think harder you start to notice that they are similar. Jonas from The Giver stands out among the dark eyed people because of his light eyes, and Ned Begay from Code Talker stands out because of his heritage. Learning to be different shows the readers that being original is good, but being unique is outstanding.

Stop, think about this for a moment. You are in a community that cannot see color, has no feelings, no choices to be made on your own, and no diversity between each other. How would you feel? Jonas, a twelve year old boy and the Giver have to live in this community knowing all this. As they live in this futuristic dystopian community they share memories of the past and what is elsewhere.

People have always wondered what a difference and similarity a dystopian/utopian society would have with our modern day society. With the help of modern day society and the givers society we can figure out the differences between Modern day society and the Givers society. Modern day society and the society in the Giver have many differences including Rules, Family, And Figurehead/Leadership; however they also have a few similarities. In modern society the rules do not say that people can not ride a bike without a given age, people can take food from the restaurants as long as the people paid for the food, people have the right to be different from other people, people can choose who they want to marry, how many children they want, what job people want to have in the future, people have

Pale Eyes When daily life is controlled, it is possible some people wouldn’t have the ability to see color and most parents wouldn’t love their children just due to the fact that it was not the way they were “programmed”. It may get a little frustrating after awhile... if someone even noticed that something was off. In the science fiction novel The Giver by Lois Lowry, there is a twelve-year-old boy named Jonas. He is named the new Receiver which is a very respected and high-end job in his community. This job also introduces him to a man that he calls the Giver.

Jonas’s society is extremely different than the one we live in today. The first difference between The Giver and our society is the number of family members. In the book they can only have two kids, one boy and one girl; however, in America we are free to have as many kids as we would want. The second

I think that the Community described in "The Giver" was extremely micromanaged by the government, or in this case, the Committee of Elders. This micromanaged place made me feel very perplexed, because it made me wonder who would ever agree to live here or live such a life. By "such a life", I mean such a life where one does not have much leeway to make a choice of their own. For example, peoples' jobs are chosen for them by the government. I also found it strange how Jonas is fascinated by eye color, and even embarrassed, when he sees Gabe's eyes and realizes that his own eyes are the same color.

In The Giver, Lois Lowry shows her readers what it is like to live in a society with no diversity, no color, and no freedom. In this society, there is a twelve-year old boy, named Jonas, who finds the truth about life outside of his community. He does not have the option of choice, and he is stuck in a futuristic world of “sameness”. Jonas’ world is dull, and he wants to change it because it does not have the amazing features and opportunities that he learns about. In this story, Lois Lowry is warning her readers that too much conformity can lead to no freedom and no true happiness.

In the Giver people are not allowed to make decisions, the author does this to comment on our worry of mistakes. In Jonas's society people are not given choice in their life the Giver said this is because, “‘He might make wrong choices.’” (Lowry, 98). In the community

“We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others” (Lowry). In other words, this means that to get what you want, you have to get rid of other things you have. Although there are many similarities between The Giver and our society, there are a lot more differences like families, rules, and personal freedoms. For starters there are many differences with families between their society and our society.

The giver by Lois Lowry- Analytical essay ________________________________________________________ What if we lived in a world of peace and equality? What if we lived in a world with no differences? A world with no social classes and inequality. That sounds pretty amazing doesn’t it?

“Perfection is shallow, unreal, and fatally uninteresting” (Anne Lamott). Can you picture our world as a perfect society? For perfection to be achieved everything would have to change. Through the book, The Giver, Lois Lowry shows how a perfect society is not always ideal for everyone. The rules of the society portrayed include a discipline wand, chosen spouse, and release.

Many people have different meanings of perfect. In The Giver society they want everything to be perfect and that 's where there differences apply. There is no individuality between the people in this society. In The Giver’s society the people are being watched for mistakes and perfection so the society looks perfect. The society is very strict on what people do and how they do it.

The perspectives introduced by Kurt Vonnegut Jr.’s “Harrison Bergeron” and Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” consist of extreme conditions that depict the future of a perfect world. Vonnegut Jr. and Le Guin ’s stories involve the futuristic, utopian societies that later mutate into the complete opposite of what originally started as the ideal community. “Harrison Bergeron” and “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” also include the corruption and the negative change that anger the authorities due to a specific individual that lives within the community. Vonnegut Jr.’s “Harrison Bergeron” and Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” have excessively significant symbols that surface, revealing people’s intense desires

Imagine living in a perfect society. No pain, everyone is equal, and perfect laws that every person follows. Now imagine being exactly like every other person with all your daily choices being made by someone else for you. In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, this is exactly how they are living. The author writes about how Jonas’ perfect society is not so perfect after all.