Compare And Contrast The New Jersey Plan Vs Virginia Plan

The colonies of Virginia and Massachusetts were very different places that attracted people with contrasting values. Virginians were risk-takers who sought wealth and fortune. Massachusetts settlers were families who wanted religious freedom. The colonies were structured differently and those who lived in them had distinct lifestyles. Personally, I would have preferred to live in Massachusetts because it was safer, self sustainable, had a strong sense of community, and the colonists did not squabble often with the Native population.

The three branches would write, enforce, and judge the laws. This part of the New Jersey Plan is the same as the Virginia Plan, except that this plan would have a one house congress. The smaller states liked the idea of a three branch government, but would make

Charles Pinckney of South Carolina solicited whether defenders from the arrangement "intended to nullify the State Governments through and through." On June 14, a contending plan, called the "New Jersey Plan," was displayed by designate William Paterson of New Jersey. The New Jersey Plan kept government controls rather restricted and made no new Congress. Rather, the arrangement extended a portion of the forces at that point held by the Continental Congress. Paterson made ugly the resolved restriction of representatives from huge numbers of the littler states to any new arrangement that would deny them of equivalent voting power ("rise to suffrage") in the authoritative

The Great Compromise’s origin was from the creation of two men, Edmund Randolph (Virginia) and William Paterson (New Jersey). They both thought of one plan of how each state would be represented in Congress. Both plans were named from where they started from, Virginia and New Jersey. The Virginia plan entailed a Bicameral Legislature, a legislature with two house/chambers. It said that representation would be based on state population in both houses.

The Virginia Plan, proposed by James Madison favored the larger states for a two-house Congress to be based on each state’s population. This, of course, was argued about because small states felt as if they would not have enough voice. In disapproval to the Virginia Plan came the New Jersey Plan. This plan argued for a one house Congress, with equal representation. This meant that each state would have the same number of members.

The Great Compromise was Roger Sherman’s plan, and was an attempt to resolve the conflicts between the smaller states and larger states, settling the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan called for a bicameral

Following the American victory against Britain in the American Revolution, the Americans found themselves in need of a new government that would not repeat the mistakes of their oppressors, and their answer could only be found in a compromise between two brilliant but conflicting ideas. Fifty-Five men all gathered to represent each of the states except Rhode Island, with one goal in mind; to make a new, functional government that would not oppress or burden the people of their nation in any way. Two main ideas were proposed, The Virginia plan and a plan created by William Paterson. These two plans conflicted in many ways and caused heated debates among the state representatives.

The plan proposed by Virginia otherwise known as the “large-state plan.” Which proposed “a bicameral legislature, in which the lower house would be elected proportionately and the upper house would be selected from a list of nominees sent from the state legislatures on the basis of equal representation for the states. ”(add footnote) As the smaller states feared that this plan would lose a voice in the federal government if they continued with the Virginia plan, they opposed this plan and came up with one for themselves which would be known as the “small-state plan.” The small-state plan would propose “a unicameral Congress, with equal representation for each state, with all the powers of the Confederation Congress.

This meant that each state would have a certain number of representatives based on the states population. Delegates were afraid that this system would lead to malapportionment and the larger states would become dominate. The delegates from the thirteen states were so quick to turn the Virginia Plan’s powerful national government down because of the British extreme control over the colonies, however James Madison did bring up some worthy opposing augments. James Madison said on June 8th 1787

After no progress of which plan to go through with, Roger Sherman came up with the Great Compromise. The compromise called for two house legislator. Members of the house of representatives or the lower house would be elected by popular vote. Members of the Senate or the upper house would be chosen by the state legislators. Each state would only have two senators no matter the size, or population of the state.

The larger states supported the Virginia Plan in which the number of representatives was based on a state’s population (Weatherman 2). The smaller states, afraid of losing power in the new government because under that plan their number of representatives would be substantially less would not accept the Virginia Plan and instead opted for the New Jersey Plan in which each state would Stemple

The three main colonies that we hear about are Virginia, Plymouth, and Massachusetts. These three colonies basically define all the others, as each group and its main founder either went for a personal financial gain or to escape religious persecution. Virginia was originally settled by Captain John Smith and grew into a successful trade colony through tobacco. Plymouth was originally founded by the Separatists and was lead by William Bradford. Eventually the dwindling Plymouth joined with Massachusetts which was originally Puritan based.

The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were reconciled by using both ideas in which the lower house of the legislature was represented by the basis of population, and the upper house would be equally

For out ancestors the definition of freedom had very different meanings. Massachusetts and Virginia were both very different because, one was more concentrated in religion and the other one ruled with a General Assembly. This two types of ruling made significant change on how the both acted in the terms of freedom. The main problem of Massachusetts was that’s people were not free to join any type of church and the people were not able to have their opinion to make laws. In Virginia the problem of freedom was that there was with the servants.

In the end the Great Compromise was like the merging together of the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. According to The American Journey, “When 9 of the 13 states had approved, the new government of the United States would come into