Define Rhetorical Analysis

4822 Words20 Pages

Define Rhetoric. Rhetoric is the study and interpretation of any literary piece of work that has persuasive intentions to utilize language more effectively. Define discourse. Discourse is any literary work, whether it is literally written or orally spoken, that has meaning underlying inside of its text. It can range from books to images to music, etc. Define persuasion. Persuasion is any form of active exposition in which its text’s intent is to convince its audiences towards its advocation over a certain topic. It can be utilized in a debate as well as advertisements, etc. Who were the Sophists? What were they known for? The Sophists were a didactic community of Sicilians in the fifth century in Greece that began to teach Athenian citizens …show more content…

Another method that can ignite ethos is an understanding. If the audience sees that the speaker clearly understands the audience’s perspective and tries to relate to their experiences, then they can have better judgment on the speaker. Expertise. The last technique to create ethos is expertise. When the audience can tell when a speaker is deriving their sources from their research accurately, this can show the audience that the speaker has a certain level of expertise. Give examples of the way speakers address pathos. There are several methods to how speakers address pathos. Speaker utilize words and metaphors relevant to the idea he/she is trying to express to produce emotions in the audience. They can also choose to demonstrate illustrations and strong examples to the audience to add emotion to the logic. These attempts will kindle more pathos. Define topoi. Topoi is the usual structure of argumentative statements, rather than the actual details of the specific argument. Give examples of general topoi. Some examples could be: Suppose that one might want to purchase nice shoes with a colleague and are attempting to convince the other about where to go. Consistency of …show more content…

Status quo is the statement of current events and affairs. Define burden of proof. The burden of proof is when the other side opposite of the side that is basing on presumption tries to prove them guilty. Define fallacies Fallacies are errors that occur during argumentative reasoning. Then, describe each of the following fallacies: Ad personam/ Ad hominem. Ad personam is when a speaker includes personal judgments on the person of the other side in an argument. Ad populum. Ad populum is when a speaker mentions and argue that if a statement is widely believed by the vast majority of people, it is true. Just because something is believed to be true by many does not automatically make it a good reason for an argument. Appeal to authority. Appealing to authority is when there are inappropriate and non relevant experts in charge of an argument concerning topics outside their range. Appeal to ignorance. Appealing to ignorance is when there is lack of proof presented by the originators of a strong of assertion. Guilt by association. Guilt of association is when conclusions are directly jumped into based on proof that is not relevant to the issue. Post hoc ergo propter

Open Document