Differences Between Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

Martin Luther King, Jr believe in nonviolence and Malcolm X encouraged violence. Martin Luther King, Jr believe in integration while Malcolm X did not believe in integration. Martin Luther King, Jr believed everyone was equal but Malcolm X believed that white people were inferior to African Americans. Martin Luther King, Jr and Malcolm X were both great public speakers. They both had a lot of people believe in their causes.

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X took two very different approaches to the civil rights problem in America. Whilst they both wanted the same thing which was to improve the rights and lives of the African Americans they believed the best way to achieve this was different. Martin Luther King took to peaceful marches and protests. Malcolm X on the other hand encouraged resolution by any means necessary. Both of their approaches were necessary to fix the problem.

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr were undeniably large figureheads in the push for equal and better rights for African Americans in the 1960s. However they were not both civil rights leaders as Malcolm X goes to great lengths to clarify he is not advocating for civil rights but human rights. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X wanted freedom for themselves and other African-Americans however had different opinions on how to obtain that goal. Malcolm X followed a philosophy Karl Marx, and Martin Luther King followed a philosophy closer to John Locke.

Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X both were civil rights leaders during the 1960s. They wanted to improve the status of blacks in the United States. They wanted to end racism and discrimination on blacks. Although they had the same goals, their methods and attitude were different in many ways. But they both had the significant impact on the civil right movement during the 1960s.

Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr were civil right leaders who were well respected for their ideas. However, they had differences that would impact the success of their initiatives. Malcolm X had superior solutions for a strong centralized black community and a stable black economy, while King’s ideas made more sense in terms of his nonviolent philosophy and push for an integrated education system. Whiles Martin Luther King, Jr’s idea about blacks and whites together would work in a perfect society,America was far from a perfect society in the 1960s.

Malcolm X and Martin Luther KIng Jr are both very critical parts in the fight for social and economic justice for african americans in the 60s though both of these men fought for the same things they had different ways of thinking and different strategies that they used to get this economic and social justice/eqaulity. Martin Luther KIng Jr and Malcolm X were both very smart men with great ideas that helped african americans take a step closer to getting the eqaulity they deserved economically and socially. Martin Luther King Jr was a well known african american civil rights activist in the 60s that voiced his opinion and ideas in order to make a change. Martin Luther King Jr had many stratigies when it came to getting what he wanted and what he wanted more than anything at the time was a equal economic status for african americans. At this time in the 60s african

Not only did they use different tactics one of them wanted a more beneficial impact for the African American community and employment crisis. Malcolm X shows that he wanted to have a different approach and impact on the problem when he stated, "That will enable us to create employment for the people of our community so they don't have to be constantly be involved with boycotting and picketing...." unlike MLK, Malcolm X didn't want to be a part of boycotting and picketing businesses instead he wanted African Americans to own businesses because they could obtain more money and hire more African Americans at their desirable amount. Martin Luther King, Jr's tactic for obtaining his goal was to boycott businesses and companies to influence white business owner to hire more African Americans shown by MLK stating, "Along with the march as a weapon for change in our nonviolent arsenal must be listed the boycott." by this statement MLK means the weapon that changes society is the boycott (which is the refusal of buying goods from a business, company, store, or etc.) compared to Malcolm X's tactic for obtaining his goals MLK had a whole new approach to the problem which they

DBQ: Martin Luther King and Malcolm X: Rewrite During the 1960’s there was a greatly increased in violence in America. There were riots, bombings, racism, and discrimination. Many African American were mistreated due to the racist people who intervened the African Americans from doing anything. Two civil rights activists wanted change for African Americans and were both fighting for the same cause, civil rights.

The African American Civil Rights movement existed at large between the early fifties and the late sixties in a society that was constantly on the verge of social destruction. The black rights movement existed politically, socially, and economically everywhere in the United States. As time progressed the movement developed and saw many changes along with schisms separating activists and how they approached getting their rights. In the early fifties there was a large non-violent integration based movement spearheaded by figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks. However, as the time progressed, the movement started seeing a more aggressive leadership with figures such as Malcolm X, but eventually it turned into an extremist movement

MLK’s “I have a dream” speech promoted the idea of integration. He believed that the races were created equal and that blacks should be respected as American citizens. Malcolm X followed Muslim principles and believed that he would protest “by any means necessary.” He would do whatever needed in order to obtain freedom for African-Americans whether it be violence or nonviolent. Malcolm opposed integration and believed that blacks needed to fend for themselves in the fight against whites.

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had the same goal of improving the place in society of blacks. While they did have the same motivation they chose to express it with two very different philosophies. Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy however made significantly more sense for America in the 1960’s as it was integration based and disapproved of violence and segregation. Malcolm X’s view was quite the opposite, he believed that if you wanted something, you needed to fight for it, and he supported segregation of education and business. He also supported using violence to gain deserved rights.

Malcolm X didn’t agree with what King’s views, he believed that MLK’s dream was not a dream but a nightmare. Martin Luther King Jr’s approach to civil rights and equality was non-violent protesting, sit-ins, and getting as much people together as possible while not using violence. However, Malcolm X’s approach to this was almost the opposite. He was against the views of whites and he was willing to do whatever was needed to achieve

The civil rights movement would not have been possible without the contributions of many ordinary people. But these ordinary people could not have been organized without the skills of the leaders of the civil rights movement. Two very famous civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Malcolm X in particular contributed to the cause of desegregation. Though both men contributed much to the act of desegregation, these men had very different ideologies about the process of desegregation. By analyzing the two pieces and comparing how and why they are different, the differing strategies of the two men can be better understood and applied to issues of today.

Martin Luther King Jr. was the leader of peaceful protests and nonviolence for the segregation among blacks and whites while Malcolm X wanted to gain justice through any possible way even if it required violence. The Montgomery Bus Boycott made King a more prominent leader

The men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so