Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide

One of the main objections to autonomy-based justifications of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) that Gill talks about is that many people believe it does not promote autonomy, but instead is actually taking it away (366). First, it is important to clarify what autonomy means. According to Gill, it is the ability of a person to make big decisions regarding their own life (369). Opponents of PAS argue that it takes away a person’s ability to make these big decisions and so it is intrinsically wrong for them to choose to take their own life.

By allowing the option of physician assisted suicide, the state may be softening the idea that there is no hope for someone that ill, and that sends the wrong message to the public. Just as well, the Death With Dignity legislation may compromise the view that people have on doctors as healers (Plaisted 205). Patients may lose trust in them if they condoned, or even participated in physician assisted suicide. Those who are against PAS feel that there should not be a loss of hope for someone suffering from an incurable disease, and are against my argument

Certainly, it is cheaper to give one dose of pills that end a suffering patient’s life than to keep them alive with whatever means physicians must use. As a matter of fact, William E Barlow, PhD (2009) claims that medical care for cancer alone is estimated to have cost the United States 89 billion dollars in 2007 (p. S33). This number would not be so high if we allowed people to have terminal cancer to put an end to their suffering. Again, this only takes cancer into consideration; there are numerous other terminal diseases that lead to nothing but suffering during the last few months of one’s life.

First, patients have the right to choose what kind of treatment they get, and whether to get treatment or not. Because they have the right to die with dignity and in a humane way. They will get prolonged pain if they don’t die. Second, physician assisted suicide can take away burden of patient and their family. Because some patients feel emotionally, physically and financially drain members of the family because of their being sick.

Doctor-assisted suicide, or euthanasia, can cause deaths under circumstances where the person is not mentally able to make that decision for themselves. Doctor-assisted suicide should be illegal because of how many unnecessary and unwanted deaths it has caused. Doctor-assisted suicide, or euthanasia, gives doctors too much power to kill, it also persuades powerless people to think about ending their life, and it makes patients who don 't actually want to die request it in belief that they are burdensome to the people around them. Doctors receive too much power from patients and medical facilities to assist suicide to patients with illnesses or patients who think they need to end their life in general. According to Cristian Nordqvist, euthanasia is known as "the means to take a deliberate action with the express intention of ending a life to relieve intractable suffering" (Nordqvist, Christian).

Physician-assisted suicide is a great way for someone who is terminally ill to die comfortably, without suffering through months of pain and agony. There are, of course, rules and regulations that control who can take advantage of these new laws. In the six states that currently allow this by law, physicians can aid someone in death in a few different ways. The most common procedure is to prescribe a lethal dose of medication to hasten the dying process.

Huba 1 In today’s healthcare, there is an abundance of ethical issues that nobody is entirely certain how to deal with. To enumerate, every person has a different opinion on each medical issue. As a result, there is a substantial amount of confusion on how the supreme court should rule on each ethical dilemma. Yet, our heavenly Father has only one standing on each ethical issue.

Imagine getting diagnosed with a terminal illness and being told your last months would be spent in extreme pain. Every day somebody is diagnosed with a terminal illness and is given months to live and most of those months are spent in extreme pain that is controlled by multiple medications. Hospice care is available to help their pain in the end, but they usually cannot speak for themselves at that point. Physician-assisted suicide would allow them to choose when, where, and how they die, and their death would be quick and painless. Not only does this help the patient, but it also helps the family cope with the loss.

“Legislation that allows people to end their lives automatically creates incentives to seek death as a cost-saving option. The elderly and infirm are seen as burdens and can easily be disposed of. Suicide becomes the easy way out.” (Ben Broussard) Most of the time physicians are against the idea of physician assisted suicide because it goes against their job description and personal beliefs.

After researching both sides of the argument, it is clear that the benefits of physician-assisted suicide outweigh the disadvantages. The benefits of ending a patient’s pain and suffering, minimizing the emotional and financial effects on families, and preserving the right for patients to decide their own fate, supports the legalization of physician-assisted suicide.

Patients have the right to the kind of treatment they want. 3) Conclusion a) Physician assisted suicide can help treat the terminally ill how they would like to be treated. b) The long history of assisted suicide speaks for itself in the matter of if it should be legal or

’s turn to die. I don’t believe that we should have the power to decide one’s fate. An important part to recognize that is not talked a lot about in this topic is that if euthanasia and assisted suicide is illegal, then doctors won’t have the pressure and burden of having to take someone’s life, even if the person wanted it. These people are educated to be doctors, not killers. They are meant to use everything in their power to save patients, not take away their life.

The dying patient no longer has quality of life, they have lost their independence, are lonely, are forced to endure inevitable pain, are publicly humiliated, are suffering immensely, and are forced to watch their loved ones grieve because of them. It is an innate Constitutional Right to choose how to die, since we all will die. There comes a point when the poking and prodding becomes too much, when the patient wants to just die in silence in the loving arms of their

They were sitting ducks in the game that is life, and death was awaiting them. These people no longer had a chance to live. Terminal illness’s change you, they become you. By

Patients who are terminally ill or those who suffer from incurable diseases can choose to get medical attention but that would be eventually futile since the person will not be saved. One would simply prolong the life of suffering and pain while spending a lot of money. There are thousands of cases involving a family has gone bankrupt to ensure medical care for a terminally ill person, or to keep up the treatment for an incurable disease. Prolonging such lives would only lead to heartache, financial challenges, and eventual futility. Instead, euthanasia allows peaceful death in a medically monitored environment.