Evidence Based Practice Examples

Deb Kanya Initial Post Polit & Beck, (2012) describe Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) as an integration of clinical expertise, patient values, and the best research evidence. One of the more challenging aspects of EBP is the actual research on a particular topic. The fact is there is a multitude of journals and reviews etc. on any given subject; for this reason it is imperative that one knows how to conduct a proper search for pertinent information. Due to the complexity of literature searches and the amount of information available it is prudent to follow a guide while doing research.

In this experiment, researchers took advantage of the lack of medical knowledge that existed within the public. In particular, the Public Health Service conducted the experiment on 600 African American men in order to record the natural history of syphilis. Although the researchers told the men that they were being treated for “bad blood”, which is a term encompassing several illnesses including syphilis, fatigue, and anemia, they did not receive the proper treatment needed to cure their ailments. Men were inclined to participate in the experiment because they received free meals, free medical exams, and burial insurance in turn. However, despite the men consenting to the experiment, there is no proof that verifies that the men were properly informed about the study and its purpose.

Another issue with the evidence-base program is with the randomized control trial (RCT). The used of the randomized control trial is usefulness but not value. According to Tanenbaum (2005), the effectiveness is due to the methods used can be difficult to understand and can have biases associated with the program (p. 165).

The author states “. The rate of use was 7.8% in men aged 19–30”. This quote shows the use of scientific data. The use of data is the first difference between the two

The PHS (Public Health Service) department recruited local doctors and nurses who would not treat the men with syphilis (Clinton). They had white physicians within their department administer the study (Batten). There were 400

The methodologies consist of physicians that conducted a study or knowledgeable about the diseases, evidenced-based literature reviews, experiments, laboratory blood work, X-rays, drugs, and educational programs. Before the study began, the physicians had to persuade and consult the authorities to give them

They also share commonalities in having the best research and clinical skills using scientific-based research to convey assessments and interventions. In order for clients to receive the best treatment we must use empirical science and evaluate treatment data to evaluate and make sure clients are receiving the best treatment possible for their individual needs. Furthermore, scientific approaches can ensure us that the interventions utilize should be the most effective. It is important that scientific practice provides us with the ability to acquire skills to evaluate and formulate hypothesis. The scientific-practitioner model ties into the BCBA guidelines as well.

Majority of the research used in reference was from highly credible sources, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the National Institutes of Health, and other published works. However, there is no way of confirming that the work that was not from these sources is credible, and this may lead to information that is only opinion, as opposed to

Student Learning Outcomes Upon completion of the teaching initiative, undergrad nursing students will be able to: 1. Identify two indications and two contraindications for Foley catheter insertion. 2. Discuss catheter-associated urinary tract infection & apply evidence-based principles for inserting and removal of a catheter. 3.

While some studies can be justified as in the case of "the research on HIV in sub-Saharan Africa that can be justified by the

The evidence used in the study

In the academic discourse, from Annal of Internal Medicine by Kalyani Sonawan chose to use a very authoritarian tone to provide research on how men are being infected by HPV more than women. In this article, there were very unfamiliar words that can be very difficult to pronounce and understand. I am sure that a scientist would have no problem understanding the diction the author chose. There weren’t any opinions or feelings stated in this article about how the impact of HPV could impact the people who were infected and their families. It briefly mentioned the symptoms and risk of someone who is infected but not in depth.

For instance, three randomized trials were done in sub-Saharan Africa to evaluate the protective effect of MC against HIV. All three trials revealed that MC resulted in lower incidence of HIV infection. The first trial was conducted in 2005 in South Africa, where 3000 men between 18 and 24 were included in the study resulting with 60% less HIV infection (Auvert et al., 2005). The second controlled trial in Kisumu, Kenya, also helped to discover that MC reduces the risk of HIV for 60% (Bailey et al., 2007). In turn, 51% reduction of HIV infection risk was achieved after the third controlled trial in Uganda’s Rakai District (Ronald H Gray,

Without research, people will continue suffering from epidemics and diseases that are difficult to treat. The importance of science is that it creates an opportunity for scientists to seek further knowledge that can help them understand how diseases work. For example, the cure for HIV/AIDS can only be found, if scientists continue conducting research on how the virus operates and how it can be treated. It is of great importance that research efforts are well-funded and that researchers receive the support they need to ensure that research efforts are successful. The information collected from proper research is helpful to all health professionals in the provision of targeted and well-informed treatment plans that meet the needs of the

This article has many authors. they are Arthur E. Chin, M.D., Katrina Hedberg, M.D., Grant K. Higginson, M.D., M.P.H, and David W. Fleming, M.D. M.D. means medical doctor, while M.P.H. means masters in public health. All of these authors are medical doctors, therefore they have experience and knowledge.