On the scale of Idealism and Pragmatism, I consider myself to be pretty central. I believe strongly in my morals and values and wouldn’t abandon them for an unimportant matter, however, I also strongly believe that dealing with a real-world problem with real-world solutions is necessary. Based on the play Julius Caesar, I would see myself the most in Brutus due to his strong sense of doing what he believes is right. Brutus, such as myself, is loyal to his beliefs, and the republic in which he lives. On the other hand, Brutus is naive to the reasoning Cassius has for wanting to kill Caesar, which is something I would like to believe I’d grasp. Cassius is able to persuade Brutus to join his cause, using the right words, but with the wrong motivations,
Moreover, Antony’s greed and thirst for power, combined with Brutus’s trust in him, reveal that Brutus is more gullible and confiding than he may seem. These traits further flesh out Brutus’ personality and give him dimension. If Shakespeare had not developed Antony’s traits as a foil character, audiences would not have viewed Brutus as a multi-dimensional
In the play, Julius Caesar, by Shakespeare, Brutus and Antony utilize ethos, pathos, and logos in their speeches. They do so in various ways to get the Romans on their side. Every character has their own personality that allows them to react differently to certain things. Brutus refers to his honor to vindicate himself while Antony wants to avenge the murder of Caesar. Both orators appeal to their credibility and trustworthiness to get the mob on their side.
Many things to Gain “Friends,Romans,countrymen,lend me your ears”(III,I,1) In William Shakespeare's “Julius Caesar” Antony, Caesar’s associate, uses rhetoric throughout his speech to gain many different feelings from the citizens. In the beginning of Antony’s speech he uses pathos to gain sympathy from the citizens. “I come to bury Caesar,not to praise him.
From the beginning of our existence, humans have dreamt of flying. Laboriously toiling, we try to accomplish our fantasies of flight, only to often result in failure, like Icarus flying too close to the sun. Since the mythical tale of Icarus, humankind as a species, have done many amazing feats, as well as not doing as great as we could have because of our own overload of ambition, which leads to the question; ‘Was Icarus a hero or a failure?’. Icarus was a failure; after meticulously working on sets of wings forged out of seemingly impossible building material, Daedalus and Icarus himself had finally achieved freedom from the labyrinth, but Icarus proceeded to ignore his father’s wishes, letting his own wants get the best of him, and he ultimately, drowned in the sea because of his lack of planning and carelessness. Icarus’s failure to channel his inner restraint and ambition will be compared to other famous figures in literature, including Julius Caesar, Don Quixote and Amy Tan.
“Brutus and Caesar—what should be in that “Caesar”? Why should that name be sounded more than yours?” Cassius persuades him into thinking with his more patriotic side. He also brings up a good point: Caesar can be indesive and fickle with his actions. Ultimutely his heart was
In two of Shakespeare's most notable historical plays, namely, Julius Caesar and Henry V it can be observed that the characters with the most power, or the greatest potential to obtain and exploit the power they yield, are also the most idealistic characters in the play. In other words, there is a correlation between the decisional power and influence a character has and the level of idealism with which they see their surroundings. Idealism is the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of perfection. Often, the fall of a play’s tragic hero is due to hubris, however in Julius Caesar it is rather his disproportionate amount of idealism that eventually brings Brutus to downfall. This directly contrasts with Henry V because, although being an idealist
Humanity and repititon The tale of Oroborus is about a serpent that eats its own tail, continuing a cycle of creation and destruction for endless centuries. This encapsulates the constant rebirth and demolition that is displayed in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Caesar had just destroyed all of his competition and was officially the ruler of Rome; Although, not everyone agreed with his total rule. Brutus, Caesar's best friend, is on the fence about Caesar's indefinite rule. This is challenged when Cassisus tries to convince Brtuts to join a conspiracy to kill Caesar.
This rational method of comparing Brutus and Caesar serves to emphasize Cassius’s argument through a logical method of persuasion. As evidenced by the techniques of pathos, rhetorical questions, and compare and contrast, Cassius uses persuasion in a skillful way in order to convince Brutus to overthrow
First, Cassius uses ethos, pathos and logos to manipulate Brutus into joining the conspirators. When Cassius first mentions joining the conspirators Brutus is sceptical and asks him “into what
Unfortunately, Cassius uses Brutus’ altruistic characteristic and devout loyalty against him by sending fake letters with concerns regarding the crowning of Caesar for Brutus to read and be persuaded to join the conspirators. Cassius’ manipulation of Brutus serves as an example of how Shakespeare
Cassius saves the life of Caesar, sees him beg for water, and witnesses his epileptic seizure. From these weaknesses, Cassius finds himself to be just as worthy of the crown as is Caesar. His reasons are emotionally tied to getting rid of Caesar, Brutus chooses to become a conspirator for the good of Rome. He does not know how Caesar will use his power.
This once again shows Brutus’ convincing ways. Brutus eventually persuades everyone to go along with his own ideas instead of Cassius’, who was the original planner behind the
In the play, Julius Caesar by written by William Shakespeare the extended view of Brutus in a result to his idealism. Brutus is convinced to kill Caesar, he was worried about about where Rome is heading as a country as Brutus was an honourable man. He decides to kill his close friend Caesar. Brutus was a very objective man, he didn’t base things on a personal side but always about the facts and what’s really happening.
Cassius wants Brutus to believe that their futures need to be changed because Caesar is leading them into tyranny. Cassius then uses flattery to show Brutus that he is equal in power to Caesar. “Brutus and Caesar… Write them together, yours is a fair a name”. Cassius explains this to Brutus that he is just as capable of reaching the height of power Caesar possesses. Following this conversation Cassius develops a plan to further manipulate Brutus.
Brutus’s Idealism Does Brutus’s idealism make him a traitor to Rome or the BIggest Roman Hero? Brutus’s idealism made him believe that Rome was in danger in history and in Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar” which caused him to betray his friend, Caesar. Brutus’s fear for the Roman Republic caused him to betray his friend who may have became a tyrant without being killed. This caused anarchy among them instead of actually helping the republic, good job Brutus. He even says that he fears for the people if they choose Caesar as a king.