Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

Although he hadn’t done so, there was no grant for leniency or release in his imprisonment; as his cellmate told him, “‘Don’t matter if you was or was’t All they gotta do is say you was’” (158). With the way this is mentioned in the book, the problem that most readily comes to mind is in regards to innocence. H had been jailed with no proof and no chance of discharge (bar a ten-dollar fine he was incapable of producing), worsened still by the fact that he was completely innocent of the crime he was accused of in the first place. It prompts the question of how frequently the convicted were innocent, or unfairly, disproportionately tried, but the greater issue lies in the use of the criminal justice system as a means to disproportionately target black people, both innocent and guilty, as a form of legal slave labor after slavery had been

Gideon v. Wainwright was a Supreme Court case that approached criminal justice around the mid 1950s and 1960s. In certain states criminals were not receiving fair representation in courts, which violated the Sixth Amendment. It wasn’t until the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright of 1963 that this issue changed. Gideon v. Wainwright was the most controversial and influential the Supreme Court ever took on, due to the fact that it challenged the very way criminals are incarcerated by the court themselves. Earl Gideon was a man with an eighth-grade education, he ran away from home when he was in middle school.

In 1963, the Gideon v. Wainwright case violated the United States Constitution as the court did not grant Gideon his constitutional right to be provided counsel. Clarence Earl Gideon committed many nonviolent crimes in his early life but on June 3, 1961, Gideon was involved in a burglary in the Bay Harbor Pool Room in Panama City, Florida. Between midnight and 8:00 am, he broke a door, smashed a cigarette machine and a record player, and stole money from a cash register. Based on a witness’s account, the police arrested Gideon and charged him with breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny. When Gideon went to trial, he requested an attorney to represent him.

Gideon v. Wainwright Clark, 1 Gideon v. Wainwright: The Right to Counsel Amber Clark Liberty High School 2A Gideon v. Wainwright was a Supreme Court case involving Clarence Earl Gideon, a man who received felony charges in the state of Florida for breaking and entering to commit a misdemeanor offense. The importance of this case lies in the Constitutional questions it dealt with, such as a citizen?s right to counsel, and the resulting decision that gave the right to counsel to all, at any court level. Gideon?s case was argued on January 15th, 1963.

Jonathan Wayne Nobles was not truly rehabilitated. Some individuals thought him to be rehabilitated, but others saw through his bogusness. From the examples that will be given; they will show how Nobles was just “faking it, to make it”. His actions, religion, and attitude show it all.

The Supreme Court argued that the police officer had reasonable suspicion and searching the men was in the best interest of the officer for his protection. It was an eight to one decision, the one being William Douglas. He argued that they were giving too much power to police, and that there should be a court order for search and seizure. In this time period, stop and frisks were an everyday thing. Law enforcement broke the fourth amendment most of the time, abusing their badge that allowed them to search who they want, when they want, whether they were acting a certain way or not.

Johnathan Wayne Nobles was arrested in 1986 for the murders of two young women and the stabbing of a young man. He was sentenced to death for his crimes; he spent 12 years in prison before his death of lethal injection. During that time he sobered up, found religion, made friends, and expressed remorse for his crimes. So, was Nobles truly rehabilitated before his execution? Demonstrating those attributes proves he was rehabilitated.

On June 3, 1961, a man was accused of entering and breaking into a pool hall in Panama City, Florida. An owner of a pool hall saw that his window had been broken, some of his bottles were stolen, and that there was money missing from the machines. Clarence Earl Gideon, a poor man, was who was blamed for committing this crime. Gideon vs. Wainwright is the Supreme Court case. Gideon became arrested and became to find that his fifth, fourteenth, and sixth amendment rights were violated.

Jonathan Wayne Nobles was not truly rehabilitated. No one will ever know the truth if he was or was not fully rehabilitated, but there are several reasons to point to him not being reformed. First off, the change in his behavior. His behavior changed drastically, he went from being a basic criminal and killer to a reformed Catholic. A reason for this change in Nobles was in some eyes just a façade.

By doing this, he could have prevented the miscarriage of justice that occurred in

Rumsfeld v. Padilla Padilla, an America citizen, was arrested at the airport after a trip to Pakistan. He was initially detained as a material witness against an Al Qaeda terrorist cell. He was later declared an enemy combatant because of his alleged involvement in terrorist activities. He was accused of plotting to explode a radioactive bomb in the US. This declaration as an enemy combatant gave the Department of Defense authority to hold him indefinitely.

Wainwright illustrated the importance of personal rights guaranteed by the constitution. This case began when Clarence Gideon was denied a court appointed lawyer to represent him in a petty crime case. Gideon, unable to afford his own lawyer, was unable to adequately defend himself and consequently was convicted. However, he was undeterred. Gideon then wrote a letter to the Supreme Court to overturn this conviction with the 6th Amendment as his evidence of the court’s misconduct.

Jessica Ramirez April 22, 2015 Kenneth Mcduffwas an American murderer. He was convicted of murdering sixteen year-old Edna Sullivan, her boyfriend, seventeen-year old Robert Brand, and Robert's cousin, 15 year-old Mark Dunnam, who was visiting from California. McDuffs first death sentence was commuted in the 1990s when the death penalty was ruled unconstitutional. His first sentence was convicted in March 1992 abduction and murder of 22-year old Melissa. She was working her job as a clerk at the Quic Pac convenience store when she was abducted and driven from the location in her own vehicle.

Many people Have died unjustly and their killer or reason of death was not found to give their death justice. Justice is something not everyone gets, in “To Kill a Mockingbird” there are people who are not treated fairly. Even in the real world there are many people who do not get the justice they deserve and there should be more people who do the right thing to help them get justice. In 2015 there were 149 people who were cleared for crimes they did not commit.

The trial pertaining to Tom Robinson though a very tragic and unfair trial but is not the most unfair of the trials presented. In this trial a Tom Robinson was blamed on the false case of rape. “Atticus was asked to defend Tom Robinson, accused of raping a white woman.” (Chapter 9, page ) Now this is a case that Atticus has no real chance of winning and he knows this.