Consequence Of Globalization

It is well-known fact that immunization have saved millions of lives, however many people fail to understand how immunization is part of public healthcare plan. Similarly, many individuals are also unaware of the importance of removing healthcare inequality. Two major ways that can help relinquish such inequality is either by reducing the poverty level, or by helping underdeveloped countries to build the healthcare infrastructure. These two methods is closely related to one another. If the poverty level is reduced, more people will be able to afford healthcare, where the overall health of the community will improve.

Since cost-effectiveness seems to be the most argued consideration for global health interventions, what are other ways that cost-effectiveness could be accomplished while still treating more “expensive” diseases in low-income countries? Or, what considerations should be brought forth that are potentially more important than the cost-effectiveness argument? What are ideas for ways to help prevent burnout in physicians, especially after witnessing so much trauma in low-income countries? In the book, there were many healthcare professionals that wanted to leave Haiti and go to the U.S..

Among these potential benefits include: additional diagnostic tests, distribution of medications and vaccinations, and emergency evacuation services (Fair Benefits 2). Essentially, the Fair Benefits model emphasizes sharing the benefits of successful medical research and along with the Collaborative model, it is a solution to the four major questions regarding medical research in developing countries. These four questions include: “1) How can we prevent vulnerable patients form being exploited by research?, 2) How can such patients gives informed consent?, 3) Is it right to apply standards of research of developed countries to research in developing countries or can there be a double standard?, and 4) Are there special problems of context in doing research on poor, illiterate people in developing countries? (Pence 204).” In addition to answering these questions, there are three guidelines that need to be followed when conducting research in

Introduction In the past 20-30 years and even nowadays, the term “globalization” keeps lingering around our ears. Definitions of “globalization” have long been diversified but it is mainly related to economics, so most people treat it as the development on or the changes of human welfare in different countries due to the economic integration of the world, under which goods, services and capital are more mobile. Economic globalization, as a result, has benefited a wide range of international issues, including trade of goods and services, labor transference, development of multinational firms, education (as mental capital investment), poverty reduction, to name but a few. Although economic globalization benefits the world in many sides, some poor countries claim that such benefits are enjoyed by the rich countries

  Commission on Social Determinants of Health.  Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health; final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health.  Geneva: World Health

Globalization has facilitated a connection between social, economic, and cultural factors among communities (Bhavsar & Bhugra, 2008). The implication from this type of cohesiveness greatly affects human relationships and behaviours at various levels (Bhavsar & Bhugra, 2008). This paper will critically analyze various manifestations of globalization and argue that these implications have negatively affected mental health. This will be argued on the basis of the following subtopics: 1) the significance of income inequality, 2) the shift from manufacturing to service sectors, and 3) the impact of outsourcing jobs. With the rise of globalization, inequality has become a frightening issue that continues to expand.

Module 1 – SLP: Historical Foundations and Achievements Name University   Questions 1. Identify the controversial public health topic that is you plan to explore. Briefly state whether the controversy is related to economics, morality, religion, ethics, political interference with science, or perhaps another topic. Please explain in 2–3 paragraphs and be sure to cite sources rather than simply stating your opinion. 2.

Sir Michael Marmot put into perspective how serious social disparities are and how they influence health not only between countries but also, within countries. The issue is not medical care; in fact the United States spends the most on medical care. You would initially think the country in which spends the most on medical care must have higher health rates. Well, believe it or not, this is actually false, for instance, sixty-two countries had higher maternal health rates than the United States. This displays that a lack of medical care fundamentally is not the conflict, whereas social inequality is.

The process stimulated a worldwide industrialization competition that drew its power from the exchange and consumption of resources, the consequences of which are reminiscent of Easter Island’s collapse. Furthermore, globalized trade provided opportunities for the plague and influenza to infect an incredible number of people. Such consequences of globalization have destabilized society and established a culture of paranoia, which technological advances have failed to overcome. So although globalization is praised for having created a closer and more interdependent global community, it is this very connection that brought about environmental and physical suffering throughout

Globalization is a massive thing that affects every person on the planet in one way or another. This source raises the argument that globalization is a disease that harms people in more ways then it helps and needs to be stopped before it wipes out the human race. This raises a good point is some ways because globalization does harm humans in many way such as losing jobs due to outsourcing and the people who get the outsourced jobs are put into horrible working conditions and underpaid without benefits. But it also helps in some ways with trade and communication strengthening the relations of countries. I do agree with the source that globalization harms many people but not quite to the extent that the author goes to, I think that

We also arrive at the concept of health inequity which is defined according to the WHO as "differences in health status or in the distribution of health determinants between different population groups", which in spite of all the efforts to minimize, is still quite there. In the end, it is recommended that education and awareness about health must be spread through all classes adequately, health care services should be more readily available in a better quality among lower socioeconomic classes, to promote and encourage a healthy lifestyle with more physical activities by providing many public facilities in the more deprived countries, and not to forget raising awareness about the importance of mental health and how stress or depression for example can lead to poorer overall

I. INTRODUCTION a. BACKGROUND: Globalization is a process of interaction and integration among the people, companies, and governments of different countries, a procedure compelled by international trade and investment, and supported by information technology. Furthermore, this process has an effect on various other systems such as on the environment, culture, political systems, economic development and prosperity and lastly, on human physical well-being in societies around the world. “Since 1950, for example, the volume of world trade has increased by 20 times, and from just 1997 to 1999 flows of foreign investment nearly doubled, from $468 billion to $827 billion” (York, 2016). Technology has been another primary driver of globalization,

In several chapters, he shows how ‘cultural difference’, ‘appropriate technology’, and ‘local standards of care’ are often exploited in the field of international health to naturalize or normalize global inconsistencies in health care access. While he praises the international attention spent on the ethical quandaries of high-tech patient care and the calls to end civil rights abuses, Farmer calls for greater attention to issues of social justice. Strongly influenced by liberation theology, he contrasts the importance attached to individual rights with the way in which the violations of rights caused by structural inequalities and injustices are ignored. As Farmer shows, even in the domain of medical and bioethics, the issue of socio-economic structures is completely swept under the carpet. He refers to this as being the "elephant in the room".

Notwithstanding Guyana’s status as a low middle income country with total expenditure on health at 5.9% of GDP in 2011 27, the Guyanese healthcare system has had some vital upgrading. Nonetheless, the current institutional structures of the health system and services development in Guyana pose significant challenges requiring meaningful health planning to achieve real health reforms. Several multilateral agencies are on board in Guyana to assist its health sector development reform; these are: Inter-American Development Bank (IDB); World Bank (WB); Global Fund for AIDS, TB, and Malaria (GFATM); Global Alliance for Vaccines Initiative (GAVI); Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA); China; Cuba; European Union (EU); United States Agency for International Development (USAID); Japan’s Development Cooperation Agency (JDCA); Presidential Emergency Program Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR); US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); PAHO/WHO, UNICEF,

2. Main causes and drivers of globalization The treaty of Westphalia in 1648, has been known to be the beginning of the system of sovereign states. Unlike the previous treaties, the treaty of Westphalia drew up a list of core principles, which re-defined the conception of the state; territories were defined, and the lands uninfringeable. Supremacy of the nation-state became accepted as the norm and hence allowed growth of international relations (Pant, 2011).