History Of The Federalists

Federalist’s ideas about functions of the central government encompassed a national appeal that influenced adoption of the constitution. They convinced the delegates that a strong national government was capable of ensuring equitable resource sharing. By quoting the gaps in the Articles of Confederation, the Federalists expressed the concern that passing the constitution would address the highlighted inefficacies to make American a sustainable nation. Also, Federalists were open to new ideas including the consideration of the bill of rights. Contrariwise, the Antifederalists did not prosper in the mission to convince the delegates to oppose the constitution that provided supreme powers to the national government (Hamilton, Madison and Jay 67).

The federal government does not have full, complete power of the government, due to the fact the federal government has to power to tax, regulate commerce, and put laws into place if and only if laws are so called “necessary and proper.” Another thing was for each branch of government to have their own separation of powers and check and balance other branches of government. Either though, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists did not agree on ideas, the Constitution is a document of the general compromise between the two political parties. The weakness of the Articles of the Confederation was resolved through the compromise of the Federalists and Anti-federalists political

Overall, the British government was a tyrannical rule in which the ruling and decisions were all up to one person, King George III. Since the United States had previously already had to go through a terrifying event that was the British government, the Anti Federalists wanted to learn from their mistakes and avoid a government that would possess unmanageable power which would lead to corruption within the system and oppression for the people under the rule. Secondly, the Anti Federalists had also debated that there was a lacking of a Bill of Rights, which would protect the freedom of the people and make sure that the government would not overstep boundaries. With the current path that the Constitution was following the Anti Federalists feared the downfall of the United States, with all three of the branches of the new central government threatening all of the beliefs and ideals that the Anti Federalists had followed. Not only was there a lacking of power and representation for the people in the state there was also a lack of representation in the Central government for the people in order to speak out against the ratification of the constitution.

Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

Before I state my opinion, I must lay out the two opposing sides between the federalists and the anti Federalists. To put it simply, federalists were people who supported the ratification of the constitution. 
On the other side of the spectrum the anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the constitution. If I was living in the in the 1780’s I probably would have voted and supported the ratification of the constitution. I am the type of person that wants a strong and unified central government.

When it came to the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists the differences are many and at times very complex, due to the beliefs that the Federalists are nationalist at heart. The Federalists had an incredibly big role in shaping the new Constitution, which the Federalists used to create a stronger Constitution at great cost to the Anti-Federalists. If you ask the Anti-Federalists They believe that should be a ratification of the US Constitution in every state. But due to the Anti-Federalists being poor at organizing they really didn’t gain any ground. Although they didn’t achieve their goals of ratification of the US Constitution, but they did force the first congress under a new Constitution along with the bill of rights.

The big problem was that federalists and antifederalists had different thoughts and ideas that made an impact on their choices. The antifederalists wanted to maintain and protect the rights of the people, and they did this by giving the states more power; however, with barely no power in the government, there would be no purpose in making a government in the first place. They only did this to prevent going back to being ruled by a king, as many citizens were worried that with too much government power, the war would’ve been for nothing. But on the other hand, federalists had seen the constitution as faultless and wanted to protect its beliefs. Another part of organizing the government strength was the both sides' thoughts on the Bill of rights.

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

The federalists had political and practical reasons. Examples of political reasons is Jefferson created the Republicans and had been going against the federalists for years so they have grown to hate Jefferson. However the Federalists also had some practical reasoning such as Jefferson has always said you should not be allowed to bend the laws even just a little bit so when he bent the laws a lot the Federalists were confused. The Federalists also knew he did not want Hamilton to make a national bank because nowhere in the constitution did it say he could.

Many people thought the Articles of Confederation wasn’t strong enough for the nation. The government leaders decided to make the Constitution. It made the nation and the federal government stronger. We did a lot of things before we got to writing the new Constitution. The Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses, some are it gave most of the power to the states, it only had one branch of government and the legislative branch had little power.

The Federalist Papers were documents composed by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. These papers were built in the New York daily papers, and the thought processes behind them was to convince New Yorkers to endorse the Constitution. New York at the time was an express that was basically against federalist. A standout amongst the most acclaimed paper is the Federalist No. 10 and 51 composed by Madison. Federalist 10 managed the issue of "factions" and how a huge republic built by the Constitution, can better the impacts of these.

The Federalist Papers were, and still are, very important to American History. These series of essays, mostly written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, were published to persuade Americans to ratify the new constitution. The new constitution would replace the Articles of Confederation, what the American’s had been living under at the time. The constitution highlighted an issue that the articles did not; empowering the central government like never before. Allowing the central government to act in the interest of the United States.

During the online video assignment’s I learned a lot about the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, Federalists were those who supported the new Constitution and Anti-Federalists did not support the new Constitution because they felt it gave too much power to the national government. The Federalists also became the name of the first political party. I also learned about shays rebellion of 1786 it began because of financial difficulties brought about by a post-war economic depression, and currency was almost worthless and to make up for It a tax was placed which angered farmers they felt like they were sticking it to the little guy. Another fact I found interesting was that the final printed copy of the Constitution, was delivered to the Constitutional

The Anti-Federalists were loyal to their state governments. Some Anti-Federalists focused on the adding on the Bill of Rights and others just despised the Constitution completely. “As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety". Anti-Federalists were supported the New Jersey Plan as the Federalists supported the states just as Anti-Federalists favored. "

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Federalists were mostly merchants, bankers manufacturers, and wealthy farm owners. They basically owned land or some type of property and were well-educated. Most of these people lived in urban areas. Anti-Federalists were mostly artisans, shopkeepers, frontier settlers, and poor farmers. They were mostly uneducated and illiterate and most of them lived in rural areas.