How Did The Han Dynasty Build The Western Roman Empire

Tribes like the Mongols and the Xiongnu, which would later become the infamous Huns, had always been at China’s doorsteps, failing to make any lasting impact, until around 130 BCE, when the Xiongnu waged war on Han China. Known as the Sino-Xiongnu (Han-Xiongnu) War, the battles ended with the Han victorious but with a shaky government. The defeated Xiongnu would later go on to be an important factor in the defeat and collapse of the western powerhouse Rome.

The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire. The Han dynasty Empire and the Roman empire stood large and mighty at the start of the Common Era, with the two kingdoms controlling an unprecedented mass amount of populations under their reign. Both kingdoms rose as predecessors from previous political systems that extended lands under one rule, with the Roman Republic expansion in Europe after the Punic wars and the Qin state achieving conquest over six other nearby states creating the first imperial China in east Asia. The heavy hand of the Qin dynasty and the assassination of Rome’s beloved general, Julius Caesar, by the Roman senate, threw both kingdoms into rebellion, ushering in centuries of imperialistic rule for both in their respective timelines.

They both made an effort to support the public with roads and infrastructure, that helped connect people to others within the empires as well as outside the empire. As they developed they began to form relationships

Between the 200 B.C.E - 750 B.C. Erra years there ruled two empires both alike in dignity, the great Roman Empire and the Qin and Han Empires. Both began forming their empires into a centralized dictatorship, administered by a large and effective bureaucracy. Similarly in reaching their climax of final ruling, their economics and military increased. Both empires were not only able to to expand their territory vastly, but also dividing the empires into provinces governed by officials while doing so. The empires took on competing rivals, the Romans fought against Greece triumphing into success.

As civilizations arose in the Eastern hemisphere, each developed and succeeded due to the sophisticated techniques of imperial administration. Han China, beginning in 206 BCE, rounded out China's basic political and intellectual structure. About 100 years previous, Maurya/ Gupta India made several political contributions despite the diversity that occurred among the regions. The empire's’ different political structures and values along with similar methods of control helped shape the periods of these great civilizations. Before the Han dynasty came into power, the Uins ruled China with Shi Huangdi as the emperor.

From 100-500 CE, Rome was attacked by the Franks, Goths, Huns, Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals, Angles, and Saxons (Doc 4). Rome lost many troops being attacked by all of those groups and their military was weakened because of it. Their weakened military helped the fall of Rome because one of the primary reasons Rome was one of the strongest empires in

These barbarian invasions would grow onto build kingdoms that would eventually replace the great and Roman

There were many differences between the rulers as well as the Western and Eastern Empire. There were also similarities between them. Both Empires had values that were important to them. Justinian and Charlemagne also had things that they valued in their Empire.

The Attitude the Chinese had towards the tolerance of labor was more efficient and positive rather than thee Romans who relied more on an efficient systematic and class divided society. These empires where established roughly at different time periods but didn’t end the same. The Roman empire was established from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E and the Chinese empire was established from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E. The similarities the Roman Empire and Chinese Empire had was their Relations with barbarian’s, their democratic government, Religious policies, The Role of emperors, Gender relationships, significance of imperial armies, overextension, and the public works of projects. The differences the Roman empire and Chinese Empire had was their Geology of political

Roman Empire vs. Aztec Empire When comparing the Roman and Aztec Empire, it is clear to see similarities and differences within each civilization. Between government, religion, warfare, remarkable similarities defined two of the greatest civilizations. The differences such as social structure and economy are more prevalent between each empire. The Aztecs were a civilization that originated in Mexico. The center of their civilization was the Valley of Mexico, a huge oval basin about 7,500 ft. above sea level.

The Huns were encouraged by a realization of the civilizations weakening. Another similarity emerged with taxation issues. In China, the already heavily taxed free peasants were burdened with new taxes and many lost their farms and became day laborers on large estates, making the upper class even wealthier. While in Rome, tax collection became difficult

The Qin and Han employed different philosophies on how to run their dynasties. The Qin used controlling Legalistic ideas while the Han used the relationship building Confucianism. The Qin and Han had a different relationship with outsiders because the Qin preferred to keep foreigners out while the Han wanted to build a relationship with them. The Qin and the Han each contributed to the growth of China’s culture and expansion. The developments in trade, foreign relations, and building expansive building projects in the Qin and Han Dynasties effected the design of every dynasty

In various ways, Han China and Imperial Rome were politically similar yet also had their pair of differences. Two very well-known classical empires, both had highly advanced political systems for their time; Han China, lasted from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, and Imperial Rome, lasted from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Many think these two empires where built with no previous influence, however; the Roman Empire had retained many aspects from the Roman Republic, and Han China from the Qin Dynasty. During their peaks, they controlled the majority of the world 's population because of their constant expansion of conquered lands, while their structure of administration and rule influenced many empires and future societies around the world. Aspects such as these, ultimately, led these two empires to be, arguably, the most influential societies in the world; as their legacies still live on today.

During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.