The women from the House of Representatives who tried to address the situation and advocate for Anita Hill had several identities that allowed them to present her case in a public light. The first identity being that they were considered people of power that represented their citizens. The second identity being that they were women, that many people questioned if women could be in a position of power. The third identity being that the women were indeed the minority, that not many women were in politics, which appeared to be a disadvantage to them. The identity of being a Representative in the House facilitated their desire speak out publicly in a way that impacted many people and influenced the government to take this situation seriously. Their ability to give speeches, to present the case to the senate and to have seats in the House of Representatives facilitated national awareness of Anita's situation. The next axis that impacted the dynamic of the situation was that the women who held seats in the House of Representatives were indeed women. As women in politics, there is no doubt that they were subjected to if not harassment, at least judgments from male representatives if …show more content…
This can allude to the idea that there were even less women in the senate which led to the all male Committee. Therefore, as much of an impact that the few women in the House made, that they still were unable to fully support Anita, as there were no women on the Committee. In the event that there were women on the Committee, though they did not particularly have to support Anita, that it would have been more an even representation on the Committee and perhaps a more productive, respectful hearing. Yet, the all-male Committee reflects that women during that time are were not particularly active in government which was an important distinction to
Before Sandra stepped up, women that presented their case would often be discriminated against, because an all male panel would not be able to understand a woman’s problem. Sandra Day O’Connor stepping up helped women be heard in court because she knew how they felt. Sandra Day O’Connor shined a light on gender discrimination by ruling on discrimination cases and channeling how other people would
She says that men denied them opportunities such as voting and others and forced women to become less valued than men. She also was very focused on getting rid of the term separate spheres. Her main points were that women and men have equal rights and women should be able to be involved in
Women, although were able to vote, did not have much authority over many aspects of their lives. They were not given a voice to express or represent themselves. They were not considered equivalent to men. The Persons Case allowed them to run for public positions, attend university and get better a education. They were finally able to control their life, make decisions and were given more opportunities, as to what they want to become, rather than always teachers, nurses, and other “women suitable” jobs.
Vivian Paige wrote the article Time To Increase Representation, in the year of 2016. She does have interesting views, and a lot of support in her article, although it seems as if she did not fully research the topic. It was still interesting to read, and she is a strong writer. Time To Increase Representation contains information on how the recent election was won, and that the way that we have chosen a new president should be changed. This article has an interesting topic, it is written about the electoral college, and it is an op-ed that is an example of ethos, and explicit nature.
The average woman in 1848 could not vote, they worked at home for the cottage industry; which is making cloth at home, and taking care of the children; but if they did work, they worked in factories and made little to nothing. This was also known as the Cult of Domesticity. This system emphasized ideas of femininity. During this time, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott went to London with their husbands to participate in the National Slavery Abolition Convention only to find out that they were not allowed to participate in the convention because they were women. They decided to hold a Women’s Rights Convention in New York when they returned, this convention became known as the Seneca Falls Convention.
The women's rights movement was very important to women in the 1800’s. Women were fighting to gain momentum in society and gender equality. Women wanted to have the same rights as men did and the same power because they were getting tired of how their lives were being unfairly treated in society. All women wanted was to be allowed to live life in an atmosphere of religious freedom, having a voice in the government, and living free of lifelong enslavement by another person. Since women were treated poorly since the time period of the American Revolution, when the patriots fought to win their freedom from tyranny, women thought it was unfair since they hadn't gained freedom for themselves.
Bader Ginsburg was in tune with the evolving world and started a class in 1970 called “Women and the Law” which focused on sex discrimination (Creager 21). This was the first of its kind, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg used her experiences and the experiences of others to try and change the system that was causing the discrimination in the first place. The case that set her on the path to becoming a Supreme Court Justice came about because a single, unmarried man was trying to write off a caregiver for his dying mother. The claim was denied because “men weren’t care givers”. Justice Ginsburg saw this as her opportunity to make real change in discrimination.
STRUCTURE 1. Is Doris Anderson’s argument mainly a comparison or a contrast? Doris Anderson’s argument is mainly contrast due to fact that she compared women to other minorities such as Quebeckers, Blacks and more. 2. Does Anderson argue “point by point” or by “halves”?
The Gradual Unbinding of Revolutionary Women Women back in the 17th to 18th century were labeled insignificant and served no major roles in any life-changing events. The fate for most of the women, was being confined in their own living spaces- left to prioritize housework duties such as cooking and cleaning. The etiquette of women was subjected to remain obedient to men. The inferiority of women forced imposition of loyalty and obedience towards men; the respect to women remained unrecognized in society. Preluding to the beginning of the 18th century, before the American Revolution arose, the position of a woman was strictly only to maintain household orders and comply towards the necessities of men.
One good thing about being an American is everyone’s right to vote. For Women prior to the 1920’s that was not the case. A woman’s right to vote would have to be passed into law under the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 19th Amendment was introduced to Congress in 1878, but was not ratified until 1920 (National Achieves). For over 40 years women would have to rally together and publicly protest just for the right to vote.
This obviously shows she is on the side of women's rights in her argument and again, quoting the Declaration of Independence, gives her the quality of formality using lines from a piece that dear to American
In her speech, “For the Equal Rights Amendment” Shirley Chisholm addresses her views on securing women’s equality to ensure women have better opportunities. She is an American politician, educator and author that became the first black woman elected to the United States Congress. Chisholm supports her claims about equal rights for women by using examples of statistics to prove a point. Her purpose is to persuade her audience that women in America are neglected by equal rights and excluded from things that men are not. Throughout her deliverance she expressed an inspiring and informative tone to uplift her audience so that Congress can make a change for women.
Adding on to other limitations, women almost had no freedom in their marriage. Before the women’s rights movement, when a woman is married the “husband and wife are one person” but “that person is the husband” (Doc 7). Once a woman is married, her rights and property were governed by the husband. Married women could not make wills or dispose of any property without their husband’s consent to do so.
1. Conditions before the 19th amendment In order to understand the following information, it is important to examine the conditions before the 19th amendment was passed. This also helps us to understand the resistance that the women’s suffrage movement faced. Prior to the amendment, women were not legally allowed to vote.
In today’s world, it seems to be that women have the same rights as men, but it wasn't always this way. The speech “Women’s Rights to Suffrage” by Susan B Anthony is the most compelling of all. Susan B Anthony persuades the audience that all women should have the same rights as men. It’s shown through the speech that the federal constitution says “we the people”, the government has no right to take away rights from just one gender, and that women are considered people as well. The fact that the constitution says “we the people” is a primary point in this speech.