Marrakech By George Orwell Analysis

1. Explain the author's primary point. The author seeks to bring to light the unfair treatment of the Negros by the whites in the places they live in. He also seeks to show that leaders only make empty promises to their people. Brutal cases are most among the Negros as they are attacked and their cases go unnoticed or ignored.

The yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself, and that is what has happened to the American Negro. Something within has reminded him of his birthright of freedom, and something without has reminded him that it can be gained. (King 571). On the other hand, Orwell gives us a different look at oppression. Orwell had been a police officer in a town in Burma.

Gandhi was an incredibly influential political and spiritual leader. Despite this he was not flawless and the author George Orwell disagrees with Gandhi's morals in his sainthood. Through various rhetorical strategies and a strong tone, Orwell forms a solid argument against the ideas portrayed by Gandhi. Diction is important to note when understanding how Orwell develops his own position and criticizes Gandhi’s.

(Orwell 226-227). The serene and relaxed wording establishes the calm tone. Orwell’s use of diction guides the audience into the world that he creates. On the other hand, Bradbury creates implied depictions of his characters. Overall, the purpose Orwell’s choice in detailed writing is to construct the moods of his

Orwell begins the passage by using

Much has been said about poverty over the years. The consistency of poverty in history and its repercussions is disconcerting. The lack of appropriate education can be considered to be the foundation of poverty which often times corresponds with the rise of criminal activity. It is recognized as an insatiable quandary. However, the way that Mary Shelley incorporates poverty into Frankenstein is unheard of and infrequently thought of.

Throughout Animal Farm, George Orwell employs rhetorical devices to construct parallels between the novel and Russia in the early 1900s and when it was under Stalin's reign in the 1920's. During this time Communism started to go to downhill as the “perfect government” that Karl Marx had envisioned started to go in an opposite direction. Karl Marx believed in a society where everyone was equal, but when Joseph Stalin came to power it became evident that there will always be some kind hierarchy with the poorest living in poverty. His use of rhetorical devices helps portray his message to the reader about the flaws of Communism and why it never works. With the help of syntax, Orwell made the connection between Animal Farm and Soviet Russia,

In Eugene Collier’s short story, Marigolds, the author used figurative language and diction to convey a serious and angry tone on poverty. Marigolds, a tale full of voice elements, addressed the theme of poverty with indignation and sincerity. Though Lizabeth, Collier narrated the story; it was about a girl recalling her life during World War 2 in a poor family. In the first example of voice element, Lizabeth described poverty as “the cage in which we all were trapped” (Collier 1). She uses this metaphor to explain how penury anchored her family.

Jack Nguyen AP English 3 30, July 2015 Nickel and Dimed Rhetorical Strategies and Notes Thesis: Ehrenreich’s personal use of varied rhetorical strategies allowed her to divulge the working conditions and struggles of the poverty-stricken class to the readers in order to provoke them to realize that something has to be done about poverty.. First Body: What: Allusion Pg. 2, Logos Pg. 37. How & Effect: Ehrenreich uses these personal, rhetorical strategies based on her experiences as a low-wage worker in the poor working class. The effect is that Ehrenreich is able to show the readers the conditions in which the impoverished work in and the daily obstacles that they face in life; also there is an appeal to logic and a reference of a poverty idiom. Why: Ehrenreich is deliberately using these rhetorical strategies to incite the readers about the fact that changes need to be done to poverty because it is a detrimental thing to society.

This narrative piece is an effective expository technique that describes the narrator’s thoughts and tone. Orwell uses oxymoron such as “grinning corpse” and paradox phrases such as “the story always sounds clear enough at a distance, but the nearer you get to the scene of events the vaguer it becomes”. Another paradox statement is shown in “I perceived this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys”. Orwell’s decisions were briskly altered as he was deciding on whether to kill the elephant or not. His mind altered from “I ought not to shoot him” to “I had got to do it” and also to “But I did not want to shoot the elephant”.

The family who has to use their money scarcely, will not take money or “donations” from anyone without knowing for sure that they can pay them back. Another example of the theme poverty in the novel is the Ewell family. The Ewell family is the opposite of the Cunningham family.

“Beasts of England”, “Ode to Napoleon”, the sheep’s chants, revised anthem, “Animal Farm, Animal Farm” are among the most relevant songs mentioned in this allegory. All the animals at the farms sing these songs together at the same time and by commanding this, pigs evoke an atmosphere of grandeur and nobility. The animals on the farm feel satisfied when singing together because it brings them a sense of community, but the animals do not realise that the real purpose of the songs is to keep them focused on the tasks. THE USE OF IRONY AND SATIRE Orwell uses point of view in Animal Farm to create irony. The story is told from the naive point of view of the lower animals.

Although it is based in 1984, the social commentary it provides is most definitely applicable in this day and age. This novel analysis will touch briefly upon a few different subjects, such as symbolism and style, and the theme of the novel. Orwell has the amazing ability to keep the image of a dull,

A Study on the Violation of Fundamental Rights in Nineteen Eighty-Four and Animal Farm 1. Introduction to Fundamental Rights and their Violation in Nineteen Eighty-Four and Animal Farm In the totalitarian societies presented in Nineteen Eighty-Four and in Animal Farm by George Orwell, the violation of fundamental rights is notable. The few powerful men/animals are seen to oppress the weaker ones and this act is accomplished by means of snatching away the fundamental human rights. By definition, “Fundamental Rights are the basic rights of the people”.

It is these small ethnographic details which give Orwell’s writing such value as