Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X Similarities

Eventhough both speeches have the same goals, both still have many different ways to get the change that they want. Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X desire was to create employment for African Americans. Both of these speakers are after more employment for African Americans, although they don't share the exact tactics they still want the same goal. Martin Luther King Jr stated, " In order to bring about more just distribution of jobs and

Malcolm X argued that it was blacks’ right to protect them selves and gain freedom if the government does not want protects blacks. His supports of self-defense also attracted young blacks in the South as there are many blacks that were killed and beaten in the South (Painter,

Malcolm X believed violence was necessary for protecting yourself. He also wanted African-Americans to have the same rights as whites, but they wanted to maintain separation. King and Malcolm's viewpoints were both coherent. First, Martin Luther had a philosophy that America should be integrated.

However, the nonviolent protests and endeavors employed by African Americans in the 1960s caught the attention of individuals nationwide. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s refusal to react violently showed white Americans that African Americans were not subhuman creatures prone to violence, but humans capable of intelligence and reason. African Americans were not animals capable of only slave labor, but individuals deserving of the rights promised by the Constitution of the United States to all American citizens. In addition to the aforementioned pieces of evidence, Martin Luther King believed that violence would never lead to peace, only to more violence. He was firm and justified in his affirmation that “This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe.

Malcolm X believed that black people have been oppressed for so long as their patience has been tested through time, and Malcolm X believed that enough “time has already run out” and therefore Malcolm X believed in the “any means necessary”

While controversial, these ideas were deeply principled and reflected Malcolm X's commitment to defending the rights and dignity of African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr., on the other hand, believed in the power of nonviolent resistance as a means of achieving civil rights. King understood that nonviolent resistance could be a slow and difficult process, requiring patience, strategy, and a strong commitment to nonviolence. Which causes him to fall into pragmatism. Iy contrast, Malcolm X's belief of self-defense and the use of violence when necessary was often seen as more confrontational and less pragmatic.

Martin Luther King Jr. was famous for his philosophy of nonviolent resistance, which he believed was the most effective way to bring about social change. Malcolm X, on the other hand, began as a proponent of violent resistance, but later changed his views and advocated for nonviolent resistance as well. Despite these similarities, there were also significant differences between the two leaders. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Christian minister and believed in the power of love, forgiveness, and nonviolence. He advocated for integration and worked to create a society where people of all races could live together in harmony.

While King called for the end of segregation, Malcolm fully believed that black individuals would never be treated equally within an integrated society. He advocated for the use of self-defense and black empowerment, something still deemed controversial, which could be the reason King became the face of the movement. Their religions also differed, as Malcolm X was part of the Islamic Faith, which often conflicted with his methods of protesting and making a statement. He outwardly detested the ideology of non-violence, making claims that it would never work and that black Americans would never get what they wanted that

Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and the Civil Rights Struggle of the 1950s and 1960s: A Brief History with Documents by David Howard-Pitney is a book that explores a spectrum of documents and speeches contrasting between Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Both of them are prominent throughout the Civil Rights Movement. It emphasized that Martin Luther King Jr. stressed that African-Americans could strive for equality without the use of violence. On the contrary, Malcolm X was a leader that condoned the use of violence to uprise against racism towards African-Americans. As the chapters progressed in the book, it unraveled that both leaders still passionately believed in their own morals of performing their leadership.

He was one of those people who supported the separation of a particular group of people from a larger body on the basis of ethnicity, religion, gender, or race. In document C, it states that Malcolm X wants white people to work among their own community and that working separately will actually be working together. This means that he never thought working together would ever accomplish much. He just thought by not working with our differences it might make less of a problem and help the economy. The second reason would come from document G, it explains that helping others in your community is best.

Not only did King pave the way for civil rights laws for the black community, but he emphasized his principles of love and equality which was emphasizing the need for unity and solidarity. In Document 4, He states, “This was always a cry that we had to set before people that our aim is not to defeat the white community, not to humiliate the white community, but to win the friendship of all of the persons who had perpetrated this system in the past.” King’s message of love and unity resonated with individuals of all backgrounds. This would ultimately end the divide between black and whites whereas Malcolm X wanted to create more division which would result in bitterness from his violent approach. In Document 2 Malcolm X stated, “The white man is by nature a devil and must be destroyed.

Malcolm X gave black America a face during the situation, as he saw his people as an independent and self-sustaining community when separated from any sort of discrimination. He embraced his black culture and history, encouraging young black people to take pride in their heritage and to reject the white standards of beauty and success that had been imposed upon them. This was something that Martin Luther King never had a thought on doing. This focus on cultural and historical identity was a significant departure from the assimilationist policies of the mainstream civil rights movement. As stated in paragraph #2, Martin Luther King’s protests were being put to an end in white communities because those who did not approve of black rights utilized fear tactics to scare the protestors away from their posts.

He even faced racism at a very young age. However, Martin Luther King Jr. had a much better childhood than Malcolm X did. Sir Malcolm X and Sir Martin Luther King had similarities and differences, as did all of us. For instance, both of them fought for Black Lives Matter (Black Nationalism) and had the same goals and justice for black America; what's more, both were murdered at the age of 39. On the other hand, the most outstanding difference between them is how they worked to accomplish their goals.

Malcolm X began his speech by urging African Americans to submerge their differences and realize that they all have a common problem - political oppression, economic exploitation, and social degradation at the hands of the white man. Malcolm X was one of the most dynamic, dramatic and influential figures of the civil rights era. He was an apostle of black nationalism, self respect, and uncompromising resistance to white oppression. Malcolm X was a polarizing figure who both energized and divided African Americans, while frightening and alienating many whites.

Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.