Most would argue that America provides the top options in food variety. However, it seems that when given the choice between a pound of meat and a pound of vegetables, the more popular choice is the prior. The average American ingests approximately 207.7 pounds of meat per year, and this results in the U.S. being the second highest consumer of meat products under Luxembourg (Barclay). While a large number of Americans seem to be leaning towards vegetarianism, they are still the minority. Even with the disturbing information regarding how our meat is produced, the meat consumption levels continue to rise. According to Mark Bittman in his TED talk What’s Wrong with What We Eat, by simply decreasing our meat consumption, we can be healthier, happier, …show more content…
Procuring food became a cultural aspect as well as a necessity. Early societies began as nomadic hunters and gathers, relying solely on the land to provide them with the necessary sustenance. While history often paints the picture of ancient peoples as great hunters, most societies gained their nutrients from plants. However, about 10,000 years ago the Neolithic Revolution began in the Fertile Crescent of Mesopotamia. This was a transition from food collecting to food production, and this allowed societies to be more sedentary. This rise in food production lead to the increase in pastoralism or animal husbandry. Pastoralism by definition means keeping domesticated animals in herds. Animal husbandry is found primarily in areas with dry, infertile soil where plants cannot grow (Fletcher). However, domesticating animals to be a food source is indeed a science. There are limitations and factors that go into picking the right animals. According to evolutionary biologist Jared Diamond, six criteria must be met in order to domesticate an animal: diet flexibility, a calm temperament, the ability to be bred in captivity, a quick maturity rate, a disposition that makes them not panicky, and their ability to recognize a clear leader in a social hierarchy (“New World”). What was originally the science behind a 10,000-year-old practice has proven to still hold fast in today’s modern …show more content…
Meat consumption has risen over the years, and has caused the need for quick and easy production. Antibiotic use reigns as the key ingredient in animals feed, as well as the average America’s diet. Things like soy and buying locally grown food give us options beyond the meat in the store, however, companies like Tyson still rule the food industry. The government can place regulation on top of regulation on a company, but the real change comes at the hands of the consumer. The consumer has the right and the ability to demand better, healthier food products. When given the choice between a pound of corn-fed meat versus a pound of grass-fed meat, create your own third option. Opt for soy or vegetables. Opt for a healthier and informed
Is eating meat a detrimental threat to the environment? This debate over meat’s involvement in the global warming crisis was what inspired Nicolette Hahn Niman to write, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma.” Niman hoped writing, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma,” would cause her audience to understand that eating meat, raised on traditional farms, was a superior alternative to vegetarianism. Niman supported her claim by explaining how industrialized farms and vegetarians produce more of the three greenhouse gases that caused global warming, than that produced by traditional farms. Niman’s article fell short of being effective due to flaws in her supporting evidence and conclusion.
In the article, “Escape from The Western Diet,” by Michael Pollan, who has also written many nutritional books, blames our unhealthy eating on the food industry. He argues that we should avoid any processed foods because of what they have become (424). Also, he claims that the American views for preparing a meal has downgraded over the years (425). His solution is to not overeat, but to eat plants instead because they are not as manipulated
“Thou shouldst eat to live; not live to eat”, is a famous quote by the well known philosopher Socrates, who believed this is the perspective we should take when we are eating food. Unfortunately, the times have changed and so has the way we eat. We no longer have to go hunting for our food, or grow crops to receive all of our fruits and vegetables. Because we have become a society that has grown into the new world of technology, there would be no need to rely on ourselves for what we need-- we can simply gather our resources from other people. In the book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma”, written by Michael Pollan, takes us on a journey full of concerns of the “Food Industrial Complex”.
I did not understand the solution to the problem of being a “conscientious meat eater.” The authors never really stated or concluded an answer to the problem in the article. In the text it says “For many people who care about the environment and animal welfare, choosing to eat humanely raised meat seems like an option.” This argues that only an option to the solution is informed to the reader, and that there is no real solution to the problem at hand. The whole point of the article, “Is It Possible to be a Conscientious Meat Eater”, is to inform the reader about the issue about meat, but because there is no solution to his argument; it makes his argument less effect as a whole when persuading
In the United States, according to the North American Meat Institute, the average man will consume about 6.9 oz of meat in a day, while a women will consume about 4.4 oz. Meat companies in America produced 25.8 billion pounds of beef and 38.4 pounds of chicken just in 2013 alone. People walk into grocery stores and purchase meat but never think twice about the environment their food, or the workers that handle the animals, were in. Upton Sinclair exposed the industry with “The Jungle” in 1906, people were now fully aware of what was sometimes in the meat, this lead to the Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1906. Therefore, once the 1980s came along, companies relocated to rural areas and became a non-union workforce.
Ever since the emergence of mankind, humans have always prioritized their search for food and water. Even today the need for sustenance is still prominent; however, methods for producing it have evolved over time. The Paleolithic people went about scavenging, hunting, fishing, and gathering on their quest for food. The Neolithic Revolution marked a transition from such practices into the “cultivations of crops and the domestication of animals.” (Strayer, pg.12) Even after thousands of years, although techniques have changed, the basic concept of agricultural cultivation has still remained similar.
Jared Diamond’s 1987 article, “The Worst Mistake In The History Of The Human Race,” takes a different perspective on the agricultural revolution. According to Diamond, “The Worst Mistake In The History Of The Human Race” was the switch from hunting and gathering to agriculture and farming. Diamond’s revisionist interpretation questions the traditional progressivist belief that the agricultural revolution has continuously improved the health of our ancestors. Instead, Diamond considers the negative changes associated with the development of the agriculture.
These eaters ignore the politics concerning food rather looking for esthetics and quick service. Due to these disregarding’s, the industrial eaters won’t ever realize that eating responsibly is a way “to live free” (2). Berry then lists off seven points regarding how to eat more responsibly for the passive consumers. These points range from “[participating] in food production to the extent that you can” to “[learning] as much as you can, by direct observation and experience if possible, of the life histories of the food species” (Berry 4-5). Berry also believes that it’s important for the animals that meat comes from to have lived a pleasant life.
As diets and health become more and more of a public concern in America. Two authors weigh in on their opinions on how the American public should handle the problem of obesity as well as their solutions to the overwhelming issue. In one article, “Against Meat,” published on the New York Times website in 2009, points out that the solution to obesity should be vegetarianism. Johnathan Foer who is a vegetarian, claims that his diet and way of living is his the way of improving health in the American public. Foer’s article provides a sense of humor as well as personal stories to attempt to persuade his audience for the ethical treatment of animals along with his personal solution for his own health and the health of his family.
Tending to crops took less time than hunting and gathering food so humans used
In today’s world, there is a division among the people in the world regarding whether or not it is ethical to eat meat. After researching about eating meat and vegetarianism, I have come to the conclusion that it is indeed ethical to eat meat in today’s society. Sure, eating meat might have its drawbacks, but I have found that the benefits of eating meat far outweigh the negatives of eating it. Eating meat not only helps improve people’s health, but it also helps strengthen our economy and it has little difference in the environmental impact that involves in the farming of vegetables. Eating too much of anything usually results in a negative outcome.
“I asked myself a question: "Knowing what I know, why am I not a vegetarian?"’ Graham Hill, an inspiring speaker, introduced a new way to eat. During his speech on TED Talk, he explains to his audience how eating meat has affected the world. In a calm and humorous tone, Hill proposes his purpose. He explains to his audience by becoming a “weekday veg” you will live a better live, it’s great compromise that will help people, animals, and the environment.
Eating meat is beneficial to humanity, because they provide nourishment that cannot be obtained from other sources. Without the support of animals, humans lack a distinctive diet, that is essential to their well-being. However, since animals are so important to the diet, they deserve great care and respect as well. Humans were always hunters and gathers. They always knew that meat was a big source of protein that helped keep them going(Araki).
Most Americans in contemporary society run on an automatic default setting, not bothering to question what they attest to on an everyday basis. A monotonous routine sets in that transcends into future generations. In this current fast paced way of life it’s not difficult to fall into the trap of the unregulated food industry. The least of many concerns is to worry about a couple of unpronounceable words on the back of the cereal box one has for breakfast each morning. Many of these ingredients and their derivatives are unknown to the common shopper.
Today the modern American is not vegan, but what is commonly known as a “meat-eater,” or more specifically an omnivore. It is widely known that eating meat comes with various positive and negative attributions. Though for non meat-eaters, where does their health state stand? Becoming vegan for one's health,