Mr. Wargrave’s Actions Why did Mr. Wargrave do what he did to drive so many people insane? Mr. Wargrave does a lot to throw people off his scent in this book. For example, he invites seven people to Soldier Island, offering them work and vacation. He also creates a fake owner of the house called Una Nancy Owen and finds a way to strand everyone on the island. In the book And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie, Mr. Wargrave’s actions affect other people in the story when he made false accusations, played the role of an innocent judge, and faked his own death. Mr. Wargrave was a very smart man and he found a way to accuse everybody on the island of murder, false or accurate. He accused Edward Armstrong of causing the death of Louisa May …show more content…
Whenever someone died, he was the one who took control and sorted it all out. After General Macarthur died, Mr. Wargrave stated that it was becoming clear that Mr. Owen had to be one of them. Mr. Wargrave continued to take charge and “discover” more as the deaths continued. After Emily Brent died, Mr. Wargrave faked his own death by putting paint on his bald head and making a scene that looked a lot like a courtroom. He had made a wig of Ms. Brent’s gray wool and had used the curtains from the bathing room to make robes. He was in alliance with the doctor, so when they found his “dead” body, the doctor could lie and say that he had no pulse while his heart was still beating steadily. This becomes clear when Agatha Christie writes, “ Dr. Armstrong lifted the lifeless hand and felt for the pulse. Then he turned to the others.. ‘ He’s been shot…’ ” Mr. Armstrong had not been told by the Justice that he had killed everybody, but he had been told that in doing this, they would discover if Lombard (whom Armstrong was suspicious of) was the “killer”. As a result of this, nobody was suspicious of Mr. Wargrave anymore because he had said himself that if someone was dead, they could not be the killer. As can be seen, when Mr. Wargrave faked his death, he fooled
Level 1: Literal In the Wonders of the World by Cotton Mather, Martha Carrier is accused of being a witch and was “...indicted for the bewitching certain persons, according to the form usual in such cases, pleading not guilty to her indictment”. During her trial, many people were called as witnesses to testify against her. Even her children went as far to say that “they were witches themselves, but that their mother had made them so”. Though her children’s statement was not used against her, there was already enough sufficient statements that were claimed to be true “evidence” against the case of Martha Carrier.
Cotton Mather accounts the witch trial of Martha Carrier through reporting the accusations and crimes prosecuted against her. This trial was unjust because prosecution occurred to explain unnatural events by using unfounded, spectral evidence. All unnatural events affected the witnesses negatively in matters of health or occupation. This led the people of Salem to create a scapegoat for their misfortune and other ‘witches’ to persecute those near to them in the fear of death.
Hook: There are many situations where you would have to be a survivor. Aron Ralston, Hyeonseo Lee and Mr. Rainsford, a fictional character from “The Most Dangerous Game”, are all survivors. Ms. Lee had to leave North Korea illegally, Rainsford had to survive a murders game and Aron Ralston had to somehow find a way to get his arm out of a huge boulder. To be an extraordinary survivor you need three traits: determination, knowledge and hope. T:To begin Aron Ralston had determination.
MARY SURRATT WAS GUILTY AND WAS RIGHTFULLY EXECUTED. Mary Surratt was guilty and was rightfully executed because, she hid guns for John Wilkes Booth behind her husbands tavern. Also she was a close friend to John Wilkes Booth when the police came they asked her, where is your friend John wilkes Booth. Mary Surratt hid guns for John Wilkes Booth, that were later on used to kill Abraham Lincoln. John Wilkes Booth said he would pick up the guns or shooting irons with a small package.
Gentlemen, in the 30 years that I have been practising law in Maycomb, I have never seen a case so complicated, and so simple at the same time. Complicated because of the circumstances; a white woman’s word versus a black man’s word. Simple because of the facts; clearly no one in this courtroom is guilty besides the defendant himself, Tom Robinson. There is undoubtedly more evidence confirming the fact that Tom Robinson is guilty rather than innocent.
“The Most Dangerous Game” is a story that gets you thinking whether or not to kill or be killed, or as Rainsford says, “The world is made up of two classes--the hunters and the huntees.” That's not all though,“The Most Dangerous Game” has another question that gets you thinking, is Sanger Rainsford guilty, or not guilty? But in the end all evidence points that he is guilty of murder. For he wanted to get off the island, his view on things changed, and in the end when Rainsford was sleeping in the bed. One of the first pieces of evidence that makes Rainsford guilty was that he wanted to get off the island.
In the short story, The Most Dangerous Game, Richard Connell uses the characterization of Rainsford to show change in a character’s perspective. For example, in the beginning of the story, Rainsford makes a claim that animals have no feelings, showing that he is inconsiderate of any feelings by his own and does not care for the lives of animals. In the text, Rainsford says, “Who cares how a jaguar feels?” (3) This quote shows that in the exposition, Rainsford does not care for the feelings of animals, and cares more about hunting and killing them. Therefore, the point is proven true because his words at the beginning of the story show that he is indifferent to animals’ feelings.
In “The Scarlet Letter,” the author, Nathaniel Hawthorne, depicts Roger Chillingworth as a man that is out for revenge. Chillingworth comes into the story and immediately comes to realize that his ex-wife has betrayed him by sleeping with another man. Chillingworth wants to avenge his pride by finding the man that did him wrong by sneaking into his personal life and torturing him under his nose. Throughout this book, Chillingworth changes in many different ways, physically and emotionally. Driven by his lust for revenge, Roger Chillingworth uses his personal background to hide his intent of torturing his wife’s hidden lover, and changes his being throughout the book.
Truth The main characters in The Things They Carried are soldiers, watching people die every day. To lessen their fear of death, they do not pay much respect to the dead and treat the corpses as if they are live people; they demonstrate that the soul lives on even when the body does not. One of the ways the soul lives is through stories. In Tim O’Brien’s novel, The Things They Carried, the final chapter, “The Lives of the Dead”, is essential because it is a perfect conclusion.
Vera snuck out with a revolver, and unfortunately killed Philip. After her horrendous act, Vera was filled with guilt and ended up hanging herself. Although Vera killed Philip, she was not the killer of the other guests, instead it was Justin Wargrave. Justin is, “a man of law”,so he wanted the ten guests on Soldier Island to pay for their crimes they committed, I learned something about life in this book.
The Monstrous and Malicious Man It is human nature to feel the dire urge to act out revenge on the ones who hurt us, but how far is one willing to go to make someone feel the same sufferable pain? Roger Chillingworth, a doctor, a husband, and a revenge seeking monster who was out to destroy someone who indirectly hurt him. Roger Chillingworth, of The Scarlet Letter, becomes obsessed with avenging the sin between his wife, Hester and the town’s well respected minister, Dimmesdale, that he takes on a Devilish form that reveals his true evil intentions. Roger Chillingworth develops into a monstrous character as the novel goes on, but he was not this way until after hearing the news about his estranged wife. Chillingworth’s first appeared at
John Proctor, a more lovable what you might call protagonist of the book who sticks his feet in the ground and dies for his name. The Proctor you know however may just be different from the real John Proctor. The 3 differences of proctor in life and proctor in the play are his descriptive appearance, his personality, and his how much the witchery affected him and his family. From small little differences to big personality changes John Proctor has it all so buckle in as I use evidence to show you the real John Proctor.
The main character, Lieutenant Cross struggles between his love and his responsibilities. Ted Lavender dies in the story and the soldiers are all shocked; it causes Lt. Cross to give up his love and become a man. In the story, Tim O’Brian uses a total omniscience point of view, which reveals Lieutenant Jimmy Cross as distracted, sentimental, and caring. This causes the reader to feel admiration for him leading the country, but also empathy because he is struggling physically and emotionally. Tim O’Brian conveys the theme that war weighs heavily on a soldier.
Vera describes how he was in a judge's outfit sitting with candles surrounding him. Whoever the killer was they especially did not like Wargrave. None of the other murders were set up this elaborately. With Wargrave gone we can only imagine what happened and who was the murder!
All characters are accused and redeemed of guilt but the murderer is still elusive. Much to the shock of the readers of detective fiction of that time, it turns out that the murderer is the Watson figure, and the narrator, the one person on whose first-person account the reader 's’ entire access to all events depends -- Dr. Sheppard. In a novel that reiterates the significance of confession to unearth the truth, Christie throws the veracity of all confessions contained therein in danger by depicting how easily the readers can be taken in by