Analysis Of Naked City: The City That Lost Its Soul By Sharon Zukin

Gentrification is the process of improving a struggling neighborhood for affluent people. One of the main causes of this shown by Kelefa Sanneh’s article “Is Gentrification Really a Problem?” , is the real estate market. Things that affect the value of something in a certain neighborhood can end up having a direct influence in all of the neighborhood and can lead to gentrification. The construction of a luxury apartment building can attract more businesses and in turn, more high-quality living spaces which could eventually displace someone living three blocks away.

The average price of the condos on the waterfront went from $219,000 to $200, 000 in the past few months (Seward pg.2, 2015). This decrease in housing prices is not common, though. It is found that when gentrification occurs, the average rents in a neighborhood rises. This is due to new renters who come to these neighborhoods who can afford to pay higher rents which raises the rent (ICPH pg.2, 2009). Resultantly, this causes people to move due to the increased rent.

Document A Businesses went from low income friendly to high-income friendly. Low-income housing decreased in Woodward from 1995-2012 -Social housing increased from 1995 to 2012 It would have been better to live in Woodward in 1995 because the properties are low income friendly and more people have the opportunity to live there. Many people in Woodward in 1995 would be put in the stereotype that low-income people are committing crimes Gentrification is not okay because many people in the world have issues with finances.

Many proponents as well as advocates of gentrification like to use in many regard as code words to back up their claim that gentrification brings “revitalization” “urban renewal” and more importantly “enhances” the community. However, these are what many who are critical of gentrification deem to be “ code words”, because they appear to be ones that exude positivity when they are in fact not expressing the full story of the argument, because underneath this creeping positivity. There still exists this form of stereotyping that minorities, or those from lower socioeconomic means cannot create something that is unique or successful on their own. Furthermore, what existed in their communities before gentrification was one that brought little to no value to society.

These impacts caused by direct state-led gentrification can lead to negative effects on the locals and the relationships between each other. Due to the rise in expenses of living in neighborhoods experiencing gentrification, residents may find it demanding to pay for their basic needs such as housing which can ultimately lead to displacement from their property. Residents often find that the more affordable housing for them in the neighborhood becomes inadequate or overcrowded causing them to move to areas that have not been affected by state-led gentrification, therefore cheaper but further away from their original home. In an area undergoing gentrification, private renters especially, have a lack of control over the untenable level increase of rent causing the eviction of current residents to be able to renovate properties that will attract high-income residents who are in a position to pay the increased prices. This process of gentrification is labeled as second-wave gentrification which is developed by the state government's decisions, involves the construction of new houses on redeveloped sites, and creates a demographic mix of the upper and lower class (Bounds & Morris, 2006).

This occurred in Ferguson, Missouri, Michael Brown’s home, because it was a industrial city with many job opportunities (Hill,p.8). However, these opportunities would eventually diminish as companies outsourced labor around the 1970s and with many white people gone, it was predominantly black Americans left exposed to a city with a limited job market; consequently, poverty and unemployment rose and with this followed a poor public education

Studying the effects of gentrification are vital to the future of the NBT. What will the NBT look like in the next twenty years? That is a question that heavily relies on the future socioeconomic demographics of Harlem. The block that NBT is located on has a median income below $20,000 a year, and on the other corner of the NBT it jumps by almost $50,000. Our study also included the new development in the area that controlled the allowed height on 125th street.

In this article, “Gentrification”, by Sherman Alexie, the author tells a story about his neighborhood. The authors story was one where he thought he was doing the right thing but yet once he had done it, he did not feel good about it at all. The author shows how there is still racism in America and that can change the way people see things. The author shows this through a personal story that happened awhile back.

Inequality in the accumulation of wealth in the U.S.’s black population stretches back to times of slavery and lack of reparations for their group’s enslavement to the Social Security Act and the Federal Housing Act (GIB 1). Racial discrimination lurks in the U.S.’s housing market from its very conception after WWII, when GIs began to return home in search of a new home (RTPI). Although, the Federal Housing Administration by no means a starting point for the cause of wealth inequality, it certainly exacerbated the gap. White suburbs like “Levittown” created a white exclusive ideal neighborhood which devalued black and other nonwhite homeowners. Housing discrimination prevented blacks and nonwhites from accumulating wealth like whites would

As Thomas states in her writing “Some of the developments in Barrio Logan have been affordable housing developments, so a lot of the families that used to live in a duplex or studio [now] live in a brand new apartment with more amenities. This point illustrates the beauty in some of the homes being built and making it more afforded to stay in luxury. In Diane Palmer, book Gentrification , a Dictonary of American history, she states that “Some observers say that without gentrification, vibrant inner cities would cease to exist.”. I like what she means by this. From my personal experience I say that I see what she talking about when I go to visit a friend who live in a community like this and I must admit that it does seem very tempting to want to move to one of these communities.

While gentrification is the removal of lower income minorities from a deteriorated urban neighborhood in hopes to “revive

Lance Freeman, an associate professor of urban planning in Columbia, wanted to investigate if there was any displacement going on in two predominantly black neighborhoods that was briskly gentrifying. Much to his dismay, he couldn’t find any correlation between gentrification and displacement. What was surprising to Freeman was his discovery, “poor residents and those without a college education were actually less likely to move if they resided in gentrifying neighborhoods”. (Sternbergh, 19) Freeman adds, “The discourse on gentrification, has tended to overlook the possibility that some of the neighborhood changes associated with gentrification might be appreciated by the prior residents.” (Sternbergh, 19)

Many countries, states, and cities have been impacted by gentrification. Seattle, Washington is one of the top cities impacted. Gentrification is the process of renovating and improving a house district in order to conform the middle-class taste. The central district of Seattle Washington was one of the areas most affected in Seattle. The central district was an area of mainly Black people until everything evolves

During the 1960s, middle and upper-class populations began to move out of the suburbs and back into urban areas. Areas such as Harlem, Washington Heights and Brooklyn have deeply been affected by it. Gentrification has variable type of impact like many positive changes as a better-looking neighborhoods, more job opportunities as well as a reduction in crime rates in those areas, but with these positive changes negative results for others within the community will be affected such as displacement and rent increase which forced people to move out. Despite its positive impact which mainly affect the new incomers, gentrification seems to be better because of the positive results for the community since its main purpose is to benefit the community

From a theoretical point of view, the rationale of rent gap theory is suggesting that gentrification activities will probably occur for neighborhoods and homes in case where speculations of land or properties exist. This theory was first argued by a renowned geographer, Neil Smith, and further unevenly developed by several theorists, pointing out that if there is a potential disinvestment in property occurs, which means the estimated value generated from the piece of land or the property is higher than the current use, the rent that can be extracted will become gradually less. The extent of the gap will always tend to be developed between the rental value of the property and that which could be derived a higher reinvested use. All in all, these