“It is well that war is so terrible, otherwise we should grow too fond of it.” These words were spoken by Robert E. Lee, a Confederate general in the Civil War. While the battles during the war were indeed terrible, there was also several aspects General Lee missed in his description. The need to constantly improve during the war allowed for several technological, pharmaceutical, and strategic advances nationwide. However, these changes did not happen overnight. The earliest battles during the war proved to both armies that normal military strategies would not be acceptable. The Union and Confederacy needed not only needed to enhance old battle plans, but to create new methods guaranteed to outdo the enemy. Eager to win the war, the Union devised a strategy named the Anaconda plan. This plan was created by General Winfield Scott, and used Union ships to block all Confederate …show more content…
These tools included swords, knives, and bayonets. Swords were mainly used as a symbol of the wearer’s rank, not as a common weapon. A big hunting knife could be used as a close range weapon if their were no alternatives. Finally, bayonets stuck to the muzzles of guns as a potential weapon, but were not often used in combat. Small arms were only one aspect of battle in the Civil War. Artillery in the Civil War also came in the form of a smooth-bore cannon. Compared to older versions, this new cannon could fire at higher paths, but had a shorter range. Weapons were not the only machinery that were improved during the war. New technology also came in the form of transportation, such as hot air balloons. The idea was to create a mechanism that could elevate soldiers over the battlefield, allowing them to get a “bird’s-eye-view” of the enemy. This technology did not only help with more definitive collection of enemy information, but also provided more accurate battlefield
Introduction Having wars fought not only on land but also on water separated the Civil War from any other war before 1861. Plan Anaconda Plan Anaconda was the initial plan for the Civil War strategy devised by General Winfield Scott. This plan took place not on land but on water. General Winfield Scott knew that the South was getting supplies from many countries such as Germany, France and Great Britain. These supplies included rifles and explosives.
Generals on both sides of the Civil War used different military strategies and tactics commanded their troops. Generals Ulyssess S. Grant and William T. Sherman both had different strategies and tactics and their strategies and tactics differed from traditional military practices. Ulyssess S. Grant wanted to use two main military strategies to win the war. First, he wanted to combine military efforts. In order to cut the Confederates off from directing their forces at one place they wanted them to have to split their numbers.
Sally Wang Professor Nash History 1301 13 October 2014 Concept of War Michael Shaara’s The Killer Angels recounts the Battle of Gettysburg through the eyes of key leaders from both the north and the south. Shaara provides insight into the thoughts and decisions that were made that would inevitably determine the outcome of the bloodiest battle of the Civil War. The northern concept of war that they were fighting for the sake of freedom and to restore the union by taking in prisoners and preserving he high grounds at Gettysburg helped them force the Confederates to retreat.
The civil war was fought with more than just muskets and rifles. It was fought with multiple weapons, even some we use today. New weapons were made during the civil war and changed how the war was fought. The Weapons of the civil were varied, and were developed by a lot of different people and changed how the war was fought. One type of gun that was used in the civil war was the musket.
What was the military strategy used by the union to win the war called the Anaconda Plan? The Anaconda Plan was the very first action of naval warfare in the civil war. It was a long term strategy proposed by General Winfield Scott. It was aptly named after the exotic south american snake which kills its prey by slowly constricting and suffocating it. The Anaconda Plan was put into effect in order to divide the southern states in half, starve the Confederacy of precious war materials, and help the Union win the civil war.
The Anaconda Plan was the grand plan that the Union utilized during the Civil War. General Winfield Scott conceived the plan after the Confederate attack on Fort Sumter, on April 12, 1861. However, Scott was never able to carry out the plan, as he went into retirement. The Anaconda Plan got its name from the generals that criticized the plan. The generals criticized the plan for taking measures that were too passive, and compared it to an anaconda suffocating its victim.
“The mini ball was actually invented in France” and dramatically transformed the volume shots a single soldier could fire a weapon with an intensification of accuracy and range. The use of the mini ball elevated the kill rate significantly
Do the historians argue that the South lost the Civil War or that the North won it? Do they argue that the North’s advantages or the South’s weakness were more important? What is their most important evidence to answer that question? In this chapter, historians present arguments from their perspectives as to why they believe the North won the war.
Southerners faced the war with an optimism that grew stronger following the Confederate victory at Bull Run. ii. Grand Strategy:- Union strategy, the “Anaconda Plan”, called for a blockade of southern ports and the capture of
The Union Army attack the Confederate Army supply routes making it difficult for them. General Hooker designed a plan to attack General Lee forces and have them retreat. The Union plan was sneak up on the opposite side of where is unite was engaging were engaging the Confederate Army. The Union was hoping that engagement would keep the leadership of Confederate focus on one location. Gen Hook felt his plan was perfect.
After America became an independent country it was divided into the north region and the south region. There was a conflict between both regions; the north we anti-slavery while in the south slavery was the backbone of their living. Therefore they declared war on each other. When the civil war came in 186, America was not prepared. Due to the absence of professional and experienced leaders, both the north and south turned to the middle class to cooperate in the war including lawyers, teachers, businessmen as well as those with political experience.
During the late 1850’s and early 1860’s, people would gather for a family day at the local battlefield, after all, it was a spectacle. Unfortunately, those people didn’t know of the advancements that were being made in the field of warfare, and they paid a deadly price. The Civil War is best summed up by Christian Wolmar: By making use of innovations in communications, weaponry and transport, principally the railroads, the belligerents, especially the North, developed a new type of war that was fought with much wider use of technology and in a way that relied on mobility and flexibility far more than its predecessors. The Civil War was more than just a war between two opposing sides fighting for what they believed in.
Have you ever wondered what people used their weapons for in the Renaissance era since this was a time of peace? People came to find out that their weapons could be used for so much more than just running around a killing people. The people of the Renaissance period were starting to find new ways to use weapons and even incorporated them into entertainment. With the invention of gunpowder and the firearm, guns started to replace most of the commonly used weapons on the battlefield. The weapons of the Renaissance were not only designed for their functional use to hunt
The bayonet was a slightly more advanced weapon than the tomahawk. They originated as a hunting weapon that may have been helpful to hunters if a shot was missed. They were fifteen to thirty inches in length and looked like long-handled knives. The weapon was usually put on the end of a gun for hand to hand combat and is thought to be more painful than a bullet. The bayonet does not pierce your body completely, it has a triangular shape that tears the flesh off.
Most weaponry was small side arms such as the M1911 or and miniature sidearm like the Kolibri pistol or 1911 that was about the size of half of a kids hand. Many people at first glance thought that the tank was going to be the dominate force of the battlefield, awhile, yes that was true, but both sides had found “Anti tank” rifles where the bullets can easily pierce the tanks killing the engine, stopping the tank which would impact the tides of the war greatly. Many U.S. soldiers would be equipped with terrible weapons around 16 shotgun shells on a weapon like and M18 SLUG when they are across the battlefield. Weapons were growing of short supply so men would use their bayonets or any other sharp item they had to go to close hand-hand combat where there would only be one man left standing. Soldiers at one of the smaller battles had gotten so worried when they ran out of bullets that they started throwing rocks at the enemy for they had no other types of projectiles to defend themselves with.